Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T03:36:48.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response of Downy Brome (Bromus tectorum) and Kentucky Bluegrass (Poa pratensis) to Applications of Primisulfuron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Paul E. Hendrickson  and
Carol A. Mallory-Smith
Paul E. Hendrickson*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-3002
Carol A. Mallory-Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-3002
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Greenhouse and growth chamber experiments were conducted to evaluate primisulfuron phytotoxicity to downy brome (Bromus tectorum) and Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis) as a function of herbicide placement, adjuvants, and environmental conditions. Primisulfuron rates needed to produce GR50 (50% growth reduction) values were 0.97 ± 0.57 and 8.07 ± 1.85 g/ha for downy brome and Kentucky bluegrass, respectively. Primisulfuron was applied to downy brome and Kentucky bluegrass at three placement sites: foliar, soil, and foliar plus soil. Foliar or foliar plus soil applications were more effective at reducing downy brome dry weights than the soil application of primisulfuron, whereas Kentucky bluegrass was injured more from the soil or foliar plus soil applications than from the foliar application of primisulfuron. Primisulfuron at 5 g/ha applied alone reduced downy brome dry weights by 5%, whereas when an adjuvant was added, dry weights were reduced by 52 to 83%. Primisulfuron was more phytotoxic to downy brome at alternating temperatures of 8 to 16 C and 16 to 24 C than at 0 to 8 C. Phytotoxicity of primisulfuron was less when downy brome plants were stressed for soil moisture after herbicide treatments than when the plants were not stressed or only stressed before treatment.

Keywords

Primisulfuron, 2-[[[[[4,6-bis(difluoromethoxy)-2-pyrimidinyl]amino]carbonyl]amino] sulfonyl]benzoic aciddowny brome, Bromus tectorum L. # BROTEKentucky bluegrass, Poa pratensis L.Adjuvantherbicide placementPoa pratensisBROTEGR50, 50% growth reductionMSO, methylated seed oil
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 13 , Issue 3 , September 1999 , pp. 461 - 465
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1989. Beacon herbicide technical release. Greensboro, NC: Ciba-Geigy Corp., Agricultural Division. 8 p.Google Scholar
Ball, D. A. and Walenta, D. L. 1996. Preliminary Evaluation of Primisulfuron for Downy Brome Control in Eastern Oregon Grass Seed Production. Corvallis, OK: Seed Production Research at Oregon State University Ext/CrS 106. 83 p.Google Scholar
Hart, S. E., Kells, J. J., and Penner, D. 1992. Influence of adjuvants on the efficacy, adsorption, and spray retention of primisulfuron. Weed Technol. 6:592–598.Google Scholar
Morrow, L. A. and Stahlman, P. W. 1984. The history and distribution of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) in North America. Weed Sci. 32(Suppl. 1): 2–6.Google Scholar
Morton, C. A. and Harvey, R. G. 1994. Simulated environments influence primisulfuron efficacy, Weed Sci. 42:424–429.Google Scholar
Mueller-Warrant, G. W., Rosato, S. C., Culver, S. D., Coats, D. D., Crowe, F. J., Chastain, T. G., Young, W. C. III, Quebbeman, B. M., Kiemnec, G. L., and Cook, G. H. 1996. Residue management and herbicides in Kentucky bluegrass seed production. Corvallis, OR: Seed Production Research at Oregon Stale University Ext/CrS 106. 83 p.Google Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D. and Woznica, Z. 1985. Environment and chlorsulfuron phytotoxicity. Weed Sci. 33:395–399.Google Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D., Woznica, Z., and Manthey, F. A. 1991. DPX-V9360 efficacy with adjuvants and environment. Weed Technol. 5:92–96.Google Scholar
Peeper, T. 1984. Chemical and biological control of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) in wheat and alfalfa in North America. Weed Sci. 32(Suppl. 1): 18–25.Google Scholar
Seefeldt, S. S., Jenson, J. E., and Fuerst, E. P. 1995. Log-logistic analysis of herbicide dose–response relationships. Weed Technol. 9:218–227.Google Scholar
Upadhyaya, M. K., Turkington, R., and McIlvride, D. 1986. Biology of Canadian weeds. 75. (Bromus tectorum L.). Can. J. Plant Sci. 66:689–709.Google Scholar
Walenta, D. L. and Ball, D. A. 1997. Downy Brome Control and Seedling Kentucky Bluegrass Tolerance to Primisulfuron Application. Newark, CA: Western Society of Weed Science Progress Rep. 141 p.Google Scholar
Wanamarta, G. and Penner, D. 1989. Foliar penetration of herbicides. Rev. Weed Sci. 4:215–231.Google Scholar