Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:08:40.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Repeated Applications of Mesotrione and Napropamide on New Cranberry Plantings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 July 2017

Hilary A. Sandler
Hilary A. Sandler*
Affiliation:
Extension Associate Professor, University of Massachusetts Amherst Cranberry Station, PO Box 569, East Wareham, MA 02538
*
*Corresponding author’s E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To evaluate the weed control provided by various combinations of PRE applications of napropamide (Nap) and POST applications of mesotrione (Mes) in newly planted and 1-yr-old cranberry vines, six 2-yr experiments were conducted during 2009-2012. Three sites were treated in the year of planting plus the subsequent year (called “new plantings”) and three sites were treated in their second year of growth plus the subsequent year (called “second-year plantings”). Ten treatments, delivered in 3,735 L ha−1 water, were administered each year: Nap at 3.36 kg ai ha−1 applied once, twice, thrice or once followed by (fb) one application of Mes at 210 g ai ha−1; Nap at 5.04 kg ha−1applied once, twice or once fb one application of Mes at 210 g ha−1; Mes at 210 g ha−1 applied once or twice; and nontreated. At new planting sites, plots receiving treatments other than a single Nap application had less total weed biomass compared to nontreated plots. At second-year plantings, all herbicide-treated plots had less total weed biomass than nontreated plots; in addition, plots receiving Mes-only treatments had less total weed biomass than Nap-only treatments. Correlation analysis indicated that monocot biomass production was the primary positive predictor for total weed biomass. Herbicides did not adversely affect cranberry biomass production but overall vine colonization was poor for four of the six sites indicating that other factors, including cultivar choice, planting method, and water management, may play a larger role in rapid cranberry vine colonization than the suppression of initial weed biomass. Given the complementary range of efficacy for Nap and Mes, a combination PRE-POST herbicide program of a low rate of Nap fb Mes may be the most cost-beneficial program in many instances. If cost is a limiting factor, applying a single application of Mes to a new planting should be included as a component of cranberry bed establishment since this practice consistently resulted in significantly less initial weed biomass compared to areas left nontreated.

Keywords

Mesotrionenapropamidecranberry, Vaccinium macrocarpon Aiton.Annual applicationsbed establishmentbiomass productionintegrated weed managementsmall fruit.
Type
Weed Management-Other Crops/Areas
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , August 2017 , pp. 599 - 608
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Bradley Hanson, University of California, Davis.

References

Literature cited

Anonymous (2009) Devrinol 50-DF label. United Phosphorus, Inc. http://www.cdms.net/Label-Database. Accessed September 23, 2016Google Scholar
Anonymous (2015) Callisto label. Syngenta. http://www.cdms.net/Label-Database. Accessed September 23, 2016Google Scholar
Boyd, NS, White, S (2010) PRE and POST herbicides for management of goldenrods (Solidago spp.) and black bulrush (Scirpus atrovirens) in wild blueberry. Weed Technol 24:446–452 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon, D, Sandler, HA (2016) Distribution of Massachusetts Cranberry Varieties - 2014. http://scholarworks.umass.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1018&context=cranberry_research_repts. Accessed March 3, 2017Google Scholar
Cape Cod Cranberry Growers’ Association (2008) Bog Renovation Program: Costs to Renovate. http://www.cranberries.org/email/cccga_bogside_jul2008.pdf. Accessed September 25, 2008Google Scholar
Clark, JR, Finn, CE (2010) Register of new fruit and nut cultivars: list 45. HortSci 45:716–756 Google Scholar
Davenport, JR (1996) The effect of nitrogen fertilizer rates and timing on cranberry yield and fruit quality. J Amer Soc Hort Sci 121:1089–1094 Google Scholar
DeMoranville, CJ, Sandler, HA, Caruso, FL (2001) Planting New Cranberry Beds. http://scholarworks.umass.edu/cranberry_factsheets/10/. Accessed September 10, 2009Google Scholar
Derksen, DA, Thomas, AG, Lafond, GP, Loeppky, HA, Swanton, CJ (1995) Impact of post-emergence herbicides on weed community diversity with conservation-tillage systems. Weed Res 35:311–320 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlin, RM, Demoranville, IE (1973) Influence of devrinol (R-7465) on cranberry vine growth and crop. Proceedings of the Northeast Weed Control Conference 27:240–243 Google Scholar
Eaton, GW (1978) Floral induction and biennial bearing in the cranberry. Fruit Var J 32:58–60 Google Scholar
Else, M, Sandler, HA, Schluter, S (1995) Weed mapping as a component of integrated pest management in cranberry production. HortTechnol 5:302–305 Google Scholar
Foy, CL, Drake, CR, Pirkey, CL (1996) Impact of herbicide applied annually for twenty-three years in a deciduous orchard. Weed Technol 10:587–591 Google Scholar
Gilreath, JP, Santos, BM (2005) Weed management with oxyfluorfen and napropamide in mulched strawberry. Weed Technol 19:325–328 Google Scholar
Gleason, HA, Cronquist, A (1991) Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada. 2nd edn. Bronx, NY: New York Botanical Garden. 910 pGoogle Scholar
Hicks, JL, Hall, IV, Forsyth, FR (1968) Growth of cranberry plants in pure stands and in weedy areas under Nova Scotian conditions. Hort Res 8:104–112 Google Scholar
Kent, M, Coker, P (1992) Vegetation Description and Analysis: A Practical Approach. New York: Wiley. Pp 28–76 Google Scholar
Majek, BA (2007) The advantages of quinclorac or mesotrione use in cranberry bog establishment. Proceedings of the Northeast Weed Science Society 61:95 Google Scholar
Majek, BA, Ayeni, AO (2004) Utilization of mesotrione for weed control in cranberries. Proceedings of the Northeast Weed Science Society 58:145 Google Scholar
Mason, CY (1926) The cranberry industry in Massachusetts. Econ Geogr 2:59–69 Google Scholar
Mason, J, Sandler, HA, Hunsberger, LK (2006) Evaluation of sand stockpiles as potential sources of cranberry weeds. Weed Technol 20:58–66 Google Scholar
Patten, KD, Wang, J (1994) Cranberry yield and fruit quality reduction caused by weed competition. HortSci 29:1127–1130 Google Scholar
Pritts, MP, Kelly, MJ (2001) Early season weed competition reduces yield of newly planted matted row strawberries. HortSci 36:729–731 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roper, TR, Vorsa, N (1997) Cranberry: botany and horticulture. Hort Reviews 21:215–249 Google Scholar
Sandler, HA (2004) Factors Influencing the Colonization and Establishment of Plant Species on Cranberry Bogs. Ph.D dissertation. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst. 271 pGoogle Scholar
Sandler, HA (2008) Renovating cranberry farms. Pages 26–28 in Sandler HA & DeMoranville CJ eds., Cranberry Production: A Guide for Massachusetts. East Wareham. http://ag.umass.edu/sites/ag.umass.edu/files/pdf-doc-ppt/cranberry_production_guide.pdf. Accessed March 3, 2017Google Scholar
Sandler, HA (2009) Nitrogen rate, vine density, and weed management affect colonization of cranberry beds following disturbance. Weed Technol 23:324–328 Google Scholar
Skroch, WA, Dana, MN (1965) Sources of weed infestation in cranberry fields. Weeds 13:263–267 Google Scholar
Soczek, Z, Mackiewicz, M, Lucak, F, Kowalski, R (1977) Preliminary evaluation of some herbicides applied in young nonfruiting cranberry plantation. Acta Hort 61:309–313 Google Scholar
Strik, BC, Poole, AP (1991) Timing and severity of pruning effects on cranberry yield components and fruit anthocyanin. HortSci 26:1462–1464 Google Scholar
Uva, RH, Neal, JC, DiTomaso, JM (1997). Weeds of the Northeast. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 397 pGoogle Scholar
Welker, WV (1967) Virginia chain fern control in cranberry bogs. Weeds 15:179 Google Scholar
Yarborough, DE (2012) Establishment and management of the cultivated lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium). Int J Fruit Sci 12:14–22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarborough, DE, Bhowmik, PC (1989) Effect of hexazinone on weed populations and lowbush blueberries in Maine. Acta Hort 241:344–349 Google Scholar
Yas, AM, Eaton, GW (1982) Effect of cotton-grass on the yield components of cranberry. Sci Hort 18:125–129 Google Scholar
Zabadal, TJ, Dittmer, TW (2001) Influence of weed control, nitrogen fertilization, irrigation and pruning severity on the establishment of ‘Niagara’ grapevines. Small Fruits Rev 1:21–28 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimdahl, RL (2013) Fundamentals of Weed Science. 4th edn., San Diego, CA: Academic Press. 634 pGoogle Scholar