Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T13:01:12.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Purple Nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) Management in Corn (Zea mays) and Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) Rotations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Theodore M. Webster  and
Harold D. Coble
Theodore M. Webster
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Harold D. Coble
Affiliation:
Department of Crop Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A field study was conducted in 1994 and 1995 to determine the effect of MON 12037, linuron, and ametryn on purple nutsedge density in field corn in a 2-yr rotation with cotton. Each corn treatment included cultivation and noncultivation. A standard treatment for purple nutsedge control was applied to all cotton plots in the second season of the corn–cotton rotation. Purple nutsedge shoot densities were reduced in cultivated MON 12037, noncultivated MON 12037, and cultivated ametryn in the corn–corn and corn–cotton rotations. Purple nutsedge tuber population was reduced in the corn–corn rotation by MON 12037 with and without cultivation, cultivated linuron, and cultivated ametryn treatments relative to the noncultivated check. In the corn–cotton rotation, purple nutsedge tuber population was reduced only by the cultivated MON 12037 and cultivated ametryn treatments relative to the noncultivated check.

Keywords

Ametryn, N-ethyl-N'-(1-methylethyl)-6-(methylthio)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamineMON 12037 (proposed, halosulfuron), methyl 5-[[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl) amino] carbonylaminosulfonyl]-3-chloro-1-methyl-1-H-pyrazole-4-carboxylatelinuron, N'-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N-methoxy-N-methylureapurple nutsedge, Cyperus rotundus L. # CYPROcorn, Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer 3394’cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Delta Pine 50.’Crop rotationcultivationnutsedge tuberperennial weedametrynhalosulfuronlinuronMON 12037CYPROALS, acetolactate synthaseDAP, days after plantingfb, followed byPD, postdirectedPPI, preplant incorporated
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , September 1997 , pp. 543 - 548
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bendixen, L. D. 1973. Anatomy and sprouting of yellow nutsedge tubers. Weed Sci. 21:501–503.Google Scholar
Bendixen, L. D. and Stroube, F. W. 1977. Yellow and purple nutsedge: two weed species of worldwide significance. Weeds Today 9:9–15.Google Scholar
Doll, J. D. and Piedrahita, W. 1982. Effect of glyphosate on the sprouting of Cyperus rotundus L. tubers. Weed Res. 22:123–128.Google Scholar
Hauser, E. W. 1962. Development of purple nutsedge under field conditions. Weeds 10:315–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds. Distribution and Biology. Honolulu: University Press Hawaii. 609 p.Google Scholar
Holt, J. S. 1988. Ecological and physiological characteristics of weeds. In Altieri, M. and Liebman, M., eds. Weed Management in Agroecosystems: Ecological Approaches. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 7–22.Google Scholar
Horowitz, M. 1972. Growth, tuber formation and spread of Cyperus rotundus L. from single tubers. Weed Res. 12:348–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeley, P. E., Thullen, R. J., Miller, J. H., and Carter, C. H. 1983. Comparison of six cropping systems for yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) control. Weed Sci. 31:63–67.Google Scholar
Kondap, S. M., Ramakrishna, K., Reddy, G. B., and Rao, A. N. 1982. Investigations on the competitive ability of certain crops against purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L.). Indian J. Weed Sci. 14:124–126.Google Scholar
Patterson, M. G., Buchanan, G. A., Street, J. E., and Crowley, R. H. 1980. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) competition with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 28:327–329.Google Scholar
Rao, J. 1968. Studies on the development of tubers in nutgrass and their starch content at different soil depths. Madras Agric. J. 55:19–23.Google Scholar
Rochecouste, E. 1956. Observations on nutgrass (Cyperus rotundus) and its control by chemical methods in Mauritius. Proc. Cong. Int. Soc. Sugar Technol. 9:319–329.Google Scholar
Simkins, G. S. and Doll, J. D. 1980. Effects of crop rotations and weeding systems on yellow nutsedge control and tuber production. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 35:79–80.Google Scholar
Siriwardana, G. and Nishimoto, R. K. 1987. Propagules of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) in soil. Weed Technol. 1:217–220.Google Scholar
Smith, E. V. and Fick, G. L. 1937. Nut grass eradication studies. I. Relation of the life history of nut grass, Cyperus rotundus L., to possible methods of control. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 29:1007–1013.Google Scholar
Stoller, E. W., Wax, L. M., and Slife, F. W. 1979. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) competition and control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 27:32–37.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K., Richburg, J. S., Wilcut, J. W., and Hawf, L. R. 1995. Effect of MON 12037 on purple (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow (Cyperus esculentus) nutsedge. Weed Technol. 9:148–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wills, G.D. 1977. Nutsedge deals misery to cotton growers. Weeds Today 9:16–17.Google Scholar