Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:05:01.392Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Purple Nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) Control with Glyphosate in Soybean and Cotton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Michael W. Edenfield ,
Barry J. Brecke ,
Daniel L. Colvin ,
Joan A. Dusky  and
Donn G. Shilling
Michael W. Edenfield*
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Florida, West Florida Research and Education Center, 5988 Hwy 90, Milton, FL 32583
Barry J. Brecke
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, University of Florida, West Florida Research and Education Center, 5988 Hwy 90, Milton, FL 32583
Daniel L. Colvin
Affiliation:
Plant Science and Education Unit, University of Florida, 2556 West Hwy 318, Citra, FL 32113-2132
Joan A. Dusky
Affiliation:
University of Florida, 1038 McCarty Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611-0210
Donn G. Shilling
Affiliation:
Crop and Soil Science, University of Georgia, Athens GA 30602-7274
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies were conducted at the University of Florida, West Florida Research and Education Center to determine the effect of glyphosate on purple nutsedge control and nutsedge tuber production when glyphosate was applied to the same plots over 3 y in glyphosate-resistant soybean and cotton. Greater than 90% control of purple nutsedge foliage was achieved with a single POST application of glyphosate at 0.9 kg ai/ha in soybean or a sequential glyphosate application of 1.1 kg/ha POST followed by 0.6 kg/ha POST-directed in cotton. By the end of the third year of the study, these same treatments reduced purple nutsedge tuber density to less than 0.2% of the nontreated. In cotton, cultivation alone reduced tuber numbers by greater than 90%. Viability of tubers was also reduced by 80% in soybean and by 65% in cotton in the glyphosate-treated plots. Comparison treatments of imazaquin PRE followed by imazaquin POST in soybean or norflurazon PRE followed by cyanazine plus MSMA POST-directed in cotton also reduced purple nutsedge tuber density by ≥85% after three consecutive years of treatment.

Keywords

CyanazineglyphosatefluometuronimazaquinMSMAnorflurazonpendimethalinpurple nutsedge, Cyperus rotundus L., # CYPROcotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Delta Pine 5415 RR’soybean, Glycine max L. ‘Hartz 7555RR’CYPROtransgenic cottoncultivationpurple nutsedge population dynamicsDAP, days after plantingPOST-directed, postemergence directedEarly-POST, early postemergence
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , December 2005 , pp. 947 - 953
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1 This research was supported by the Florida Agricultural Experiment Station and approved for publication as Journal Series R-09754.
Current address: Bayer CropScience, 17745 S. Metcalf, Bldg. #1, Stilwell, KS 66085-9104.

References

Literature Cited

Barry, G., Kishore, G., Padgette, S., Taylor, M., Kolacz, K., Weldon, M., Re, D., Eichholtz, D., Fincher, K., and Hallas, L. 1992. Inhibitors of amino acid biosynthesis: strategies for imparting glyphosate tolerance to crop plants. in Singh, B. K., Flores, H. E., and Shannon, J. C., eds. Biosynthesis and Molecular Regulation of Amino Acids in Plants. Rockville, MD: American Society of Plant Physiologists. Pp. 139–145.Google Scholar
Bendixen, L. E. and Nandihalli, U. B. 1987. Worldwide distribution of purple and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus). Weed Technol. 1:61–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryson, C. T., Hanks, J. E., and Wills, G. D. 1994. Purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) control in reduced-tillage cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) with low-volume technology. Weed Technol. 8:28–31.Google Scholar
Derr, J. F. and Wilcut, J. W. 1993. Control of yellow and purple nutsedges (Cyperus esculentus and C. rotundus) in nursery crops. Weed Technol. 7:112–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1998. Weed survey—southern states: broadleaf crops subsection. Proc. South Weed Sci. Soc. 51:300–313.Google Scholar
Elmore, C. D., Brown, M. A., and Flint, E. P. 1983. Early interference between cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and four weed species. Weed Sci. 31:200–207.Google Scholar
Fischer, D. W. and Harvey, R. G. 2002. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) and annual weed control in glyphosate-resistant field corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 16:482–487.Google Scholar
Grey, T. L., Bridges, D. C., Eastin, E. F., and MacDonald, G. E. 2002. Influence of flumioxazin rate and herbicide combinations on weed control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L). Peanut Sci. 29:24–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grichar, W. J. and Nester, P. R. 1997. Nutsedge (Cyperus spp) control in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) with AC 263,222 and imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 11:714–719.Google Scholar
Grichar, W. J., Nester, P. R., and Colburn, A. E. 1992. Nutsedge (Cyperus spp) control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) with imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 6:396–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holm, L. 1969. Weed problems in developing countries. Weeds 17:113–118.Google Scholar
Horowitz, M. 1972. Growth, tuber formation, and spread of Cyperus rotundus L. from single tubers. Weed Res. 12:348–363.Google Scholar
Horowitz, M. 1992. Mechanisms of establishment and spreading of Cyperus rotundus—the worst weed of warm regions. Proc. Inter. Weed Cont. Cong. 1:94.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. C. III and Mullinix, B. G. Jr. 2003. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) interface in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Peanut Sci. 30:14–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Justice, O. L. and Whitehead, M. D. 1946. Seed production, viability and dormancy in the nutgrass Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus . J. Agric. Res. 73:303–318.Google Scholar
Keeley, P. E. 1987. Interference and interaction of purple and yellow nutsedges (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus) with crops. Weed Technol. 1:74–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLean, H. S., Richburg, J. S. III, Wilcut, J. W., and Smith, A. E. 2001. Influence of norflurazon placement on yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus). Weed Technol. 15:327–331.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. A. and Renner, K. A. 2002. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) control and tuber production with glyphosate and ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Technol. 16:512–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padgette, S. R., Kolacz, K. H., and Delannay, X. et al. 1995. Development, identification, and characterization of a glyphosate-tolerant soybean line. Crop Sci. 35:1451–1461.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. T. 1982. Shading responses of purple and yellow nutsedges (Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus). Weed Sci. 30:25–30.Google Scholar
Patterson, M. G., Buchanan, G. A., Street, J. E., and Crowley, R. H. 1980. Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) competition with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 28:327–329.Google Scholar
Porterfield, D., Wilcut, J. W., and Askew, S. D. 2002. Weed management with CGA-362622, fluometuron and prometryn in cotton. Weed Sci. 50:642–647.Google Scholar
Ranade, S. B. and Burns, W. 1925. The eradication of Cyperus rotundus L. (a study in pure and applied botany). Memoirs of India Dept. Agric. Bot. Series 13 (5):99–192.Google Scholar
Sprankle, P., Megitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1975. Absorption, action, and translocation of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 23:235–240.Google Scholar
Sprenkel, R. K. 1996. Cotton Production Guidelines. Agronomy Department Document SS-AGR-62, IFAS, University of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1987. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, 6th ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Wehtje, G. R., Walker, R. H., and Hancock, H. G. 1997. Response of purple (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow nutsedges (C. esculentus) to selective placement of sulfentrazone. Weed Sci. 45:382–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcut, J. W., Jordan, D. L., Vencil, W. K., and Richburg, J. S. III. 1997. Weed management in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) with soil-applied and post-directed herbicides. Weed Technol. 11:221–226.Google Scholar
Zandstra, B. H., Teo, C. K., and Nishimoto, R. K. 1974. Response of purple nutsedge to repeated applications of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 22:230–232.Google Scholar