Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:22:47.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preparation and Use of Voucher Specimens for Documenting Research in Weed Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Richard Carter ,
Charles T. Bryson  and
Stephen J. Darbyshire
Richard Carter*
Affiliation:
Biology Department, Valdosta State University, Valdosta, GA 31698-0015
Charles T. Bryson
Affiliation:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Southern Weed Science Research Unit, Stoneville, MS 38776
Stephen J. Darbyshire
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Central Experimental Farm, Wm. Saunders Building #49, Ottawa, ON KIA 0C6, Canada
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Voucher specimens and herbarium collections provide the foundation for many aspects of research in the plant sciences. Available for study and verification by contemporary and future workers, voucher specimens promote reproducibility in scientific method because permanent records document identification, distribution, and interspecific and intraspecific variation of species. The utility and importance of voucher specimens and herbarium collections in supporting research in weed science are discussed, and the collection, preparation, documentation, storage, and shipment of voucher specimens are detailed.

Keywords

Herbariumherbarium specimendocumentation of researchuse of herbarium specimenspreparation of herbarium specimenshandling of herbarium specimensstorage of herbarium specimens
Type
Teaching/Education
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , December 2007 , pp. 1101 - 1108
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Baker, M. A., Mohlenbrock, M. W., and Pinkava, D. J. 1985. A comparison of two new methods of preparing cacti and other stem succulents for standard herbarium mounting. Taxon 34:118–120.Google Scholar
Barney, J. N. 2006. North American history of two invasive plant species: phytogeographic distribution, dispersal vectors, and multiple introductions. Biol. Invasions 8:703–717.Google Scholar
Carter, R. 1990. Cyperus entrerianus (Cyperaceae), an overlooked species in temperate North America. Sida Contrib. Bot. 14:69–77.Google Scholar
Carter, R. and Bryson, C. T. 2000. Cyperus sanguinolentus (Cyperaceae) new to the southeastern United States, and its relationship to the supposed endemic Cyperus louisianensis . Sida Contrib. Bot. 19:325–343.Google Scholar
Carter, R. and Mears, R. L. 2000. Cyperus (subg. Queenslandiella) hyalinus (Cyperaceae) new to the United States and the Western Hemisphere. Sida Contrib. Bot. 19:345–350.Google Scholar
Carter, R., Mears, R. L., Burks, K. C., and Bryson, C. T. 1996. A report of four exotic Cyperus (Cyperaceae) species new to Florida, U.S.A. Sida Contrib. Bot. 17:275–281.Google Scholar
Croat, T. 1978. Survey of herbarium problems. Taxon 27:203–218.Google Scholar
Croat, T. 1985. Collecting and preparing specimens of Araceae. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 72:252–258.Google Scholar
Drábková, L., Kirschner, J., and Vlĉek, C. 2002. Comparison of seven DNA extraction and amplification protocols in historical herbarium specimens of Juncaceae. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 20:161–175.Google Scholar
Dransfield, J. 1986. A guide to collecting palms. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 73:166–176.Google Scholar
Funk, V. A. and Morin, N. 2000. A survey of the herbaria of the southeast United States. Sida Bot. Misc. 18:35–52.Google Scholar
Funk, V. A., Hoch, P. C., Prather, L. A., and Wagner, W. L. 2005. The importance of vouchers. Taxon 54:127–129.Google Scholar
Hall, A. V. 1988. Pest control in herbaria. Taxon 37:885–907.Google Scholar
Haynes, R. R. 1984. Techniques for collecting aquatic and marsh plants. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 71:229–231.Google Scholar
Hicks, A. J. and Hicks, P. M. 1978. A selected bibliography of plant collection and herbarium curation. Taxon 27:63–99.Google Scholar
Holmgren, P. K. and Holmgren, N. H. 1998. Index Herbarium: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden's Virtual Herbarium. http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih.Google Scholar
Holmgren, P. K., Holmgren, N. H., and Barnett, L. C. 1990. Index Herbariorum, Part I: The Herbaria of the World. 8th ed. Regnum Veg. 120. Bronx, NY The New York Botanical Garden. 693.Google Scholar
Jones, S. B. and Luchsinger, A. E. 1986. Plant Systematics. New York McGraw-Hill. 512.Google Scholar
Lavoie, C. and Lachance, D. 2006. A new herbarium-based method for reconstructing the phenology of plant species across large areas. Am. J. Bot. 93:512–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Les, D. H. and Stuckey, R. L. 1985. The introduction and spread of Veronica beccabunga (Scrophulariaceae) in eastern North America. Rhodora 87:503–515.Google Scholar
Luken, J. O., Thieret, J. W., and Kartesz, J. R. 1993. Erucastrum gallicum (Brassicaceae): invasion and spread in North America. Sida Contrib. Bot. 15:569–582.Google Scholar
Lull, W. P. and Moore, B. P. 1999. Herbarium building design and environmental systems. Chapter 5. Pages 105–118. in Metsger, D.A., Byers, S.C. eds. Managing the Modern Herbarium, An Interdisciplinary Approach. Washington, DC Society for the Preservation of Natural History Collections (SPNHC).Google Scholar
J. McNeill, F.R. Barrie, H.M. Burdet, V. Demoulin, D.L. Hawksworth, K. Marhold, D.H. Nicolson, J. Prado, P.C. Silva, J.E. Skog, J.H. Wiersema, N.J. Turland, ed. 2006. International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Vienna Code) adopted by the Seventeenth International Botanical Congress Vienna, Austria, July 2005. Regnum Veg. 146. Ruggell, Liechtenstein A.R.G. Gantner. xviii + 568.Google Scholar
D.A. Metsger, S.C. Byers, ed. 1999. Managing the Modern Herbarium, An Interdisciplinary Approach. Washington, D.C. Society for the Preservation of Natural History Collections (SPNHC). 384.Google Scholar
Miller-Rushing, A. J., Primack, R. B., Primack, D., and Mukunda, S. 2006. Photographs and herbarium specimens as tools to document phenological changes in response to global warming. Am. J. Bot. 93:1667–1674.Google Scholar
Muenscher, W. C. 1955. Weeds. Ithaca, NY Cornell University Press. 586.Google Scholar
Petřík, P. 2003. Cyperus eragrostis—a new alien species for the Czech flora and the history of its invasion of Europe. Preslia, Praha 75:17–28.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, R. A. and Lovato, M. B. 2007. Comparative analysis of different DNA extraction protocols in fresh and herbarium specimen of the genus Dalbergia . Genet. Mol. Res. 6:173–187.Google Scholar
Rosen, D. J., Carter, R., and Bryson, C. T. 2006. The spread of Cyperus entrerianus (Cyperaceae) in the southeastern United States and its invasive potential in bottomland hardwood forests. Southeast. Nat. 5:333–344.Google Scholar
Simpson, M. G. 2006. Plant Systematics. San Diego, CA Elsevier Academic. 590.Google Scholar
Šmarda, P. and Stančík, D. 2006. Ploidy level variability in South American fescues (Festuca L., Poaceae): use of flow cytometry in up to 5 1/2-year-old caryopses and herbarium specimens. Plant Biol. 8:73–80.Google Scholar
Strang, T. J. K. 1999. A healthy dose of the past: a future direction in herbarium pest control? Chapter 3. Pages 59–80. in Metsger, D.A., Byers, S.C. eds. Managing the Modern Herbarium, An Interdisciplinary Approach. Washington, DC Society for the Preservation of Natural History Collections (SPNHC).Google Scholar
Tasker, A. V. Roadside Weed Management. Federal Weed and Seed Laws in Harper-Lore, B.L., Johnson, M., Skinner, M.W., ed Washington D.C. Federal Highway Administration In press.Google Scholar
von Reis Altschul, S. 1977. Exploring the herbarium. Sci. Am. 236:96–104.Google Scholar
Voss, E. G. 1999. Labeling of herbarium specimens. Mich. Bot. 38:57–63.Google Scholar
Zimdahl, R. L. 1999. Fundamentals of Weed Science. 2nd ed. London Academic. 556.Google Scholar