Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:30:57.333Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Potential of Sulfosulfuron to Control Troublesome Weeds in Tomato

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Hanan Eizenberg ,
Yaakov Goldwasser ,
Gai Achdary  and
Joseph Hershenhorn
Hanan Eizenberg
Affiliation:
Department of Weed Research, Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, P.O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay, Israel
Yaakov Goldwasser
Affiliation:
Department of Weed Research, Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, P.O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay, Israel
Gai Achdary
Affiliation:
Department of Weed Research, Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, P.O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay, Israel
Joseph Hershenhorn
Affiliation:
Department of Weed Research, Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, P.O. Box 1021, Ramat Yishay, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There are few efficient and cost-effective methods for controlling weeds in processing tomatoes. Sulfosulfuron is a sulfonylurea herbicide developed for controlling weeds in wheat. In previous studies, we have demonstrated the efficacy of sulfosulfuron in selectively controlling Orobanche aegyptiaca in tomato. The objective of the present study was to elucidate the potential of sulfosulfuron to selectively control troublesome, nonparasitic weeds in tomato. In the greenhouse, sulfosulfuron efficacy at 37.5, 75.0, and 112.5 g ai/ha applied preplant incorporated (PPI), preemergence (PRE), and postemergence (POST) was tested. Sulfosulfuron when applied PPI and POST was highly selective in controlling weeds without causing injury to tomato. The weeds that were efficiently controlled, even at low rates of application, included purple nutsedge, black nightshade, mustard, pigweed, and bindweed. PRE application resulted in the most efficient weed control but was phytotoxic to tomato at high rates.

Keywords

Sulfosulfuronblack nightshade, Solanum nigrum L. #3 SOLNIfield bindweed, Convolvulus arvensis L., # CONARpurple nutsedge, Cyperus rotundus L. # CYPROredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. # AMAREtomato, Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. # LYPESwheat, Triticum aestivum L.wild mustard, Sinapis arvensis L. # SINARAcetolactate synthase inhibitorssulfonylurea herbicidesweed managementALS, acetolactate synthaseDAA, days after applicationDAP, days after plantingPOST, postemergencePPI, preplant incorporatedPRE, preemergence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , March 2003 , pp. 133 - 137
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1995. Mon 37500 Technical Data Sheet. St. Louis, MO: Monsanto.Google Scholar
Branthome, X. 1990. Weed control in processing tomato crops. Acta Hortic. (ISHS) 277: 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eizenberg, H., Goldwasser, Y., Golan, S., Hershenhorn, J., and Kleifeld, Y. 2001a. Orobanche aegyptiaca control in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) with chlorsulfuron. In Fer, A., Thalouarn, P., Joel, D. M., Musselman, L. J., Parker, C., and Verkleij, J.A.C., eds. Nantes, France: Proceedings of the 7th International Parasitic Weed Symposium. 293 p.Google Scholar
Eizenberg, H., Goldwasser, Y., Hershenhorn, J., Plakhine, D., and Kleifeld, Y. 2001b. Orobanche aegyptiaca control in tomato with MON 37500. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 41: 176.Google Scholar
Frear, D. S., Swanson, H. R., and Thalacker, F. W. 1991. Induced microsomal oxidation of diclofop, triasulfuron, chlorsulfuron, and linuron in wheat. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 41: 274–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldwasser, Y., Eizenberg, H., Golan, S., Hershenhorn, J., and Kleifeld, Y. 2001. Orobanche aegyptiaca control in potato. Crop Prot. 20: 403–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hershenhorn, J., Goldwasser, Y., and Plakhine, D. et al. 1998. Orobanche aegyptiaca control in tomato fields with sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Res. 38: 343–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinz, J. R. R. M. D., Owen, K., and Barrett, M. 1997. Nicosulfuron, primisulfuron, and bentazon hydroxylation by corn (Zea mays), woolly cupgrass (Eriochloa villosa) and shattercane (Sorghum bicolor) cytochrome P-450. Weed Sci. 45: 474–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kutzior, S., Spitainiak, J., Pawinska, M., and Urbanowicz, J. 1999. Sulfosulfuron use in potatoes. Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf.—Weeds 1: 349–354.Google Scholar
Mallory Smith, C., Hendrickson, P., and Mueller Warrant, G. 1999. Cross-resistance of primisulfuron-resistant Bromus tectorum L. (downy brome) to sulfosulfuron. Weed Sci. 47: 256–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, B. L. S., Al-Khatib, K., Stahlman, P., and Isakson, P. J. 2000. Efficacy and metabolism of MON 37500 in Triticum aestivum and weedy grass species as affected by temperature and soil moisture. Weed Sci. 48: 541–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinke, H., Rosenzweig, A., Clausm, K. M., Chisholm, C., and Jensen, P. 1991. DPX-E 9636, experimental sulfonylurea herbicide for potatoes. Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf.—Weeds 1: 445–451.Google Scholar
Schloss, J. V. 1995. Recent advances in understanding the mechanism and inhibition of acetolactate synthase. In Setter, J., ed. Herbicides Inhibiting Branch Chain Amino Acid Biosynthesis. New York: Springer Verlag. pp. 4–11.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K. 2002. Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. pp. 409–411.Google Scholar