Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:34:56.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Potential Environmental Impacts and Economic Damages of Eurasian Watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) in Western Nevada and Northeastern California

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Mark E. Eiswerth ,
Susan G. Donaldson  and
Wayne S. Johnson
Mark E. Eiswerth*
Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Reno
Susan G. Donaldson
Affiliation:
University of Nevada Cooperative Extension
Wayne S. Johnson
Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Reno, Department of Applied Economics and Statistics (MS 204), University of Nevada, Reno, NV 89557
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Eurasian watermilfoil, an aquatic invasive weed, has been identified recently at a number of sites in western Nevada and northeastern California, including Lake Tahoe. Because Eurasian watermilfoil is easily spread by fragments, transport on boats and boating equipment plays a key role in contaminating new water bodies. This is an important means of the potential spread of this weed throughout key recreational and agricultural areas surrounding Lake Tahoe. Unless the weed is controlled, significant alterations of aquatic ecosystems, with associated degradation of natural resources and economic damages to human uses of those resources, may occur. This research uses the economic valuation approach known as benefits transfer to estimate the value of a portion of the recreational service flows that society currently enjoys in the Truckee River watershed below Lake Tahoe. The lower-bound estimates of baseline water-based recreation value at a subset of sites in the watershed range from $30 to $45 million/yr. Impacts from the continued spread of Eurasian watermilfoil in the watershed could be significant; for example, even a 1% decrease in recreation values would correspond to roughly $500,000/yr as a lower bound.

Keywords

Eurasian watermilfoilMyriophyllum spicatum L. #3 MYPSPAquatic weedseconomic impactsinvasive speciesrecreationMYPSP
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , September 2000 , pp. 511 - 518
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, L.W.J., and Spencer, D. 1996. Survey of Lake Tahoe for Presence of Eurasian Watermilfoil. Davis, CA: University of California, Department of Vegetable Crops, Weed Science Program, USDA Agricultural Research Service Aquatic Weed Control Investigations Annual Report.Google Scholar
Bates, A. L. and Smith, C. S. 1994. Submersed plant invasions and declines in the southeastern United States. Lake Reserv. Manage. 10: 53–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, A. L., Burns, E. R., and Webb, D. H. 1985. Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.) in the Tennessee-valley: an update on biology and control. In Proceedings of the First International Symposium on watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) and Related Haloragaceae Species, July 23-24, 1985. Washington, DC: Aquatic Plant Management Society. pp. 104–115.Google Scholar
Bingham, T., ed. 1992. Proceedings of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists (AERE) Conference on Benefits Transfers. Washington, DC: Association of Environmental and Resource Economists.Google Scholar
Carpenter, S. R. 1980. Enrichment of Lake Wingra, Wisconsin, by submersed macrophyte decay. Ecology 61: 1145–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couch, R. and Nelson, E. 1985. Myriophyllum spicatum in North America. In Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) and Related Haloragaceae Species. July 23-24, 1985. Washington, DC: Aquatic Plant Management Society. pp. 8–18.Google Scholar
Crowder, L. B. and Cooper, W. E. 1982. Habitat structural complexity and the interaction between bluegills and their prey. Ecology 63: 1802–1813.Google Scholar
Davis, G. J. and Brinson, M. M. 1983. Trends in submersed communities of the Currituck Sound: 1909-1979. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 21: 83–87.Google Scholar
Desvousges, W. H., Naughton, M. C., and Parsons, G. R. 1992. Benefit transfer: conceptual problems in estimating water quality benefits using existing studies. Water Resour. Res. 28: 675–683.Google Scholar
Desvousges, W. H., Johnson, F. R., and Banzhaf, H. S. 1998. Environmental Policy Analysis with Limited Information: Principles and Applications of the Transfer Method. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar. 244 p.Google Scholar
Dewey, M. R. and Jennings, C. A. 1992. Habitat use by larval fishes in a backwater lake of the upper Mississippi River. J. Freshw. Ecol. 7: 363–372.Google Scholar
Donaldson, S. and Johnson, W. S. 1998. Eurasian Watermilfoil. Reno: University of Nevada Cooperative Extension Fact Sheet 98-37. 4 p.Google Scholar
Engel, S. 1987. Impact of submerged macrophytes on largemouth bass and bluegills. Lake Reserv. Manage. 3: 227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, A. and Raucher, R. S. 1984. Intrinsic benefits of improved water quality: conceptual and empirical perspectives. In Smith, V. K., ed. Advances in Applied Microeconomics, Vol. 3. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Gallagher, J. E. and Haller, W. T. 1990. History and development of aquatic weed control in the United States. Rev. Weed Sci. 5: 115–192.Google Scholar
Grace, J. B. and Wetzel, R. G. 1978. The production biology of Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum L.): a review. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 16: 1–11.Google Scholar
Hocutt, G. E. and Dimmick, R. W. 1971. Summer food habits of juvenile wood ducks in east Tennessee. J. Wildl. Manage. 35: 286–292.Google Scholar
Howard-Williams, C. 1993. Processes of aquatic weed invasions: the New Zealand example. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 31: 17–23.Google Scholar
Jacono, C. 2000. Nonindigenous aquatic species: Myriophyllum spicatum L. Gainesville, FL: Florida Caribbean Science Center. 10 p.Google Scholar
Johnstone, I. M., Coffey, B. T., and Howard-Williams, C. 1985. The role of recreational boat traffic in interlake dispersal of macrophytes: a New Zealand case study. J. Environ. Manage. 20: 263–279.Google Scholar
Jones, J. J. and Drobney, R. D. 1986. Winter feeding ecology of scaup and common goldeneye in Michigan. J. Wildl. Manage. 50, 446–50,452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lillie, R. A. and Budd, J. 1992. Habitat architecture of Myriophyllum spicatum as an index to habitat quality for fish and macroinvertebrates. J. Freshw. Ecol. 7: 113–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madsen, J. D. 1997. Methods for management of nonindigenous aquatic plants. In Luken, J. O. and Thieret, J. W., eds. Assessment and Management of Plant Invasions. New York: Springer-Verlag. pp. 145–171.Google Scholar
Madsen, J. D., Eichler, L. W., and Boylen, C. W. 1988. Vegetative spread of Eurasian watermilfoil in Lake George, New York. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 26: 47–50.Google Scholar
Madsen, J. D., Sutherland, J. W., Bloomfield, J. A., Eichler, L. W., and Boylen, C. W. 1991. The decline of native vegetation under dense Eurasian watermilfoil canopies. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 29: 94–99.Google Scholar
McKay, M. T., Ayre, S. J., and Williams, E. J. 1997. History and current progress on the infestation and treatment of Eurasian watermilfoil in Long Lake, Thurston County, Washington. In Proceedings of the Western Aquatic Plant Management Society, March 27-28, 1997. Seattle, WA: Western Aquatic Plant Management Society. pp. 10–11.Google Scholar
Newroth, P. R. 1985. A review of Eurasian water milfoil impacts and management in British Columbia. In Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) and Related Haloragaceae Species, July 23-24, 1985. Washington, DC: Aquatic Plant Management Society. pp. 139–153.Google Scholar
Nichols, S. A. 1994. Evaluation of invasions and declines of submersed macrophytes for the Upper Great Lakes region. Lake Reserv. Manage. 10: 29–33.Google Scholar
Reed, C. F. 1977. History and disturbance of Eurasian watermilfoil in United States and Canada. Phytologia 36: 417–436.Google Scholar
Sheldon, S. P. 1994. Invasions and declines of submersed macrophytes in New England, with particular reference to Vermont lakes and herbivorous invertebrates in New England. Lake Reserv. Manage. 10: 13–17.Google Scholar
Smith, C. S. and Adams, M. S. 1986. Phosphorus transfer from sediments by Myriophyllum spicatum . Limnol. Oceanogr. 31: 1312–1321.Google Scholar
Smith, C. S. and Barko, J. W. 1990. Ecology of Eurasian watermilfoil. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 28: 55–64.Google Scholar
Titus, J. E. and Adams, M. S. 1979. Coexistence and the comparative light relations of the submersed macrophytes Myriophyllum spicatum L. and Vallisneria americana Michx. Oecologia 40: 273–286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 1996. Natural Resource Damage Assessments; Final Rule. 15 CFR Part 990. January 5, 1996. pp. 439–510.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of the Interior. 1996. Natural Resource Damage Assessment Regulations. 43 CFR Part 11, as amended by the Notice of Final Rulemaking at 61 FR 20559. May 7, 1996. 103 p.Google Scholar
Walsh, R. G., Johnson, D. M., and McKean, J. R. 1990. Nonmarket values from two decades of research on recreation demand. In Link, A. N. and Smith, V. K., eds. Advances in Applied Microeconomics. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. pp. 167–193.Google Scholar