Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:00:58.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plant Response to Combinations of Mesotrione and Photosystem II Inhibitors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Julie A. Abendroth*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 279 Plant Science, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
Alex R. Martin
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 279 Plant Science, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
Fred W. Roeth
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, 279 Plant Science, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Photosystem II (PS II) inhibitors halt electron flow within the photosynthetic electron transport chain, thereby leading to increased oxidative stress. As a result, their addition to mesotrione, which inhibits carotenoid biosynthesis by inhibition of the enzyme 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD), is complementary. Field and greenhouse experiments were conducted in 2002 and 2003 to investigate the joint action of POST mesotrione plus PS II inhibitor herbicide combinations. The joint action of mesotrione plus PS II inhibitors was investigated across five plant species, three PS II inhibitors, and two moisture environments to determine their influence on the joint action response. Rates of mesotrione evaluated ranged from 4.4 to 87.6 g ai/ha alone and in combination with reduced rates of atrazine, bromoxynil, and metribuzin. In the field, all combinations of mesotrione at 8.8, 17.5, and 35.0 g/ha plus atrazine, bromoxynil, or metribuzin were synergistic for necrosis 6 d after treatment (DAT) on sunflower. Addition of atrazine at 280 g/ha to mesotrione at 8.8 g/ha increased velvetleaf leaf necrosis by 18 to 47%. In the greenhouse, the addition of bromoxynil at 70 g/ha to mesotrione at 17.5 g/ha increased leaf necrosis by 23 to 34% and biomass reduction by 38 to 47%. Synergism on Palmer amaranth occurred similarly under both normal and dry moisture environments at application. Plant height at application was found to influence detection of synergism on the whole-plant level.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Armel, G. R., Hall, G. J., Wilson, H. P., and Cullen, N. 2002. Efficacy, uptake, translocation, and metabolism of ZA 1296 in Canada thistle. Proc. Weed Sci. Soc. Amer. 42:5051.Google Scholar
Armel, G. R., Hall, G. J., Wilson, H. P., and Cullen, N. 2005. Mesotrione plus atrazine mixtures for control of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 53:202211.Google Scholar
Armel, G. R., Wilson, H. P., Richardson, R. J., and Hines, T. E. 2003. Mesotrione combinations for postemergence control of horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 17:6572.Google Scholar
Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:2022.Google Scholar
Creech, J. E., Monaco, T. A., and Evans, J. O. 2004. Photosynthetic and growth responses of Zea mays L. and four weed species following post-emergence treatments with mesotrione and atrazine. Pest Manag. Sci. 60:10791084.Google Scholar
Gowing, D. P. 1960. Comments on tests of herbicide mixtures. Weeds 8:379391.Google Scholar
Hess, F. D. 2000. Review: Light-dependent herbicides: an overview. Weed Sci. 48:160170.Google Scholar
Hugie, J. A., Riechers, D. E., and Tranel, P. J. 2004. Activity of photosystem II inhibitors in combination with mesotrione on triazine-resistant and sensitive Amaranthus spp. Proc. North Central Weed Sci. Soc. 59:88.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. C. and Young, B. G. 2002. Influence of temperature and relative humidity on the foliar activity of mesotrione. Weed Sci. 50:157161.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. C., Young, B. G., and Matthews, J. L. 2002. Effect of postemergence application rate and timing of mesotrione on corn (Zea mays) response and weed control. Weed Technol. 16:414420.Google Scholar
Kelly, T. L. W. and Chapman, P. F. 1995. The design and analysis of mixture experiments to meet different objectives: a practical summary. Asp. Appl. Biol. 41:5159.Google Scholar
Kruse, N. D., Vidal, R. A., Bauman, T. T., and White, M. D. 2001. Evidence for the synergism between the mixture of FS II and carotenoid inhibitors. Proc. Weed Sci. Soc. Amer. 41:32.Google Scholar
Kuehl, R. O. 2000. Diagnosing agreement between the data and the model. in Crockett, C., ed. Design of Experiments: Statistical Principles of Research Design and Analysis, 2nd ed. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole. Pp. 123147.Google Scholar
Lee, D. L., Prisbylla, M. P., Cromartie, T. H., Dagarin, D. R., Howard, S. W., Provan, W. M., Ellis, M. K., Fraser, T., and Mutter, L. C. 1997. The discovery and structural requirements of inhibitors of p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase. Weed Sci. 45:601609.Google Scholar
Morse, P. M. 1978. Some comments on the assessment of joint action in herbicide mixtures. Weed Sci. 26:5871.Google Scholar
Norris, S. R., Barrette, T. R., and DellaPenna, D. 1995. Genetic dissection of carotenoid synthesis in Arabidopsis defines plastoquinone as an essential component of phytoene desaturation. Plant Cell 7:21392149.Google Scholar
Salzman, F. P. and Renner, K. A. 1992. Response of soybean to combinations of clomazone, metribuzin, linuron, alachlor, and atrazine. Weed Technol. 6:922929.Google Scholar
Schuster, C. L., Al-Khatib, K., and Dille, J. A. 2004. Interactions between mesotrione and sulfonylurea herbicides. Proc. North. Central Weed Sci. Soc. 59:62.Google Scholar
Scott, R. C., Shaw, D. R., O'Neal, W. B., and Klingaman, T. D. 1998. Spray adjuvant, formulation, and environmental effects on synergism from post-applied tank mixtures of SAN 582H with fluazifop-P, imazethapyr, and sethoxydim. Weed Technol. 12:463469.Google Scholar
Sprague, C. L., Maxwell, D. J., and Wax, L. M. 1999. Comparisons of ZA-1296 and RPA 201772 for weed control in corn. North. Central Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep. 56:223224.Google Scholar
Stephenson, D. O. IV, Bond, J. A., Walker, E. R., Bararpour, M. T., and Oliver, L. R. 2004. Evaluation of mesotrione in Mississippi Delta corn production. Weed Technol. 18:11111116.Google Scholar
Streibig, J. C. and Jensen, J. E. 2000. Actions of herbicides in mixtures. in Cobb, A. H. and Kirkwood, R. C., eds. Herbicides and Their Mechanisms of Action. Boca Raton, FL: Sheffield. Pp. 153180.Google Scholar
Sutton, P., Richards, C., Buren, L., and Glasgow, L. 2002. Activity of mesotrione on resistant weeds in maize. Pest Manag. Sci. 58:981984.Google Scholar
Trebst, A., Depka, B., and Holländer-Czytko, H. 2002. A specific role for tocopherol and of chemical singlet oxygen quenchers in the maintenance of photosystem II structure and function in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii . FEBS Lett. 516:156160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waltz, A. L., Martin, A. R., and Spotanski, J. J. 2001. Program approaches for total weed control with ZA 1296. North. Central Weed Sci. Soc. Res. Rep. 58:161163.Google Scholar
Westberg, D. E., Oliver, L. R., and Frans, R. E. 1989. Weed control with clomazone alone and with other herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:678685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wichert, R. A., Townson, J. K., Bartlett, D. W., and Foxon, G. A. 1999. Technical review of mesotrione, a new maize herbicide. Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds 1:105110.Google Scholar
[WSSA] Weed Science Society of America, Terminology Committee. 1985. Weed Science Terminology Supplement. Weed Sci. Suppl. 33:123.Google Scholar