Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:14:47.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plant Growth Regulators Suppress Established Orchard Sod and Dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) Population

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Stephen S. Miller
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS Appalachian Fruit Res. Stn., Kearneysville, WV 25430
B. Joe Eldridge
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS Appalachian Fruit Res. Stn., Kearneysville, WV 25430

Abstract

Several plant growth regulators applied to established sod driveways in an apple orchard suppressed growth of the ground cover sufficiently to eliminate one to three mowings. MH at 4.5 or 6.7 kg ai/ha applied spring and fall reduced the growth of a single species sod cover crop, ‘Kentucky 31’ tall fescue, the year after treatment. MH at both rates also reduced the dandelion population growing in the mixed species orchard sod. Paclobutrazol or EPTC applied in the spring before or during initial grass growth reduced dry matter production in the fescue sod cover crop and the number of mowings compared to the mowed and non-mowed control plots.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barrat, J. G., Scorza, R., and Otto, B. E. 1984. Detection of tomato ringspot virus in peach orchards. Plant Dis. 68:198200.Google Scholar
2. Breuninger, J. M., Watschke, T. L., and Tukey, L. D. 1983. Effect of PP-333 and flurpimidol (EL-500) on tall fescue in an apple orchard. Proc. Northeast Weed Sci. Soc. 37:370.Google Scholar
3. Castaldi, M. 1987. The cost of establishing and operating a Mcintosh, Red Delicious, and Empire orchard in the Hudson Valley of eastern New York. N.T. Agric. Ext. Bull., Hudson Valley Lab., Highland, NY.Google Scholar
4. Hart, S. W., and deFrance, J. A. 1955. Effects of maleic hydrazide on the growth of turfgrass. Golf Course Rep. 23:57.Google Scholar
5. Hield, H., Hemstreet, S., Gibeault, V. A., and Youngner, V. B. 1979. Warm season turf growth control with Embark. Calif. Agric. 33(10):1516.Google Scholar
6. Mountain, W. L., Powell, C. A., Forer, L. B., and Stouffer, R. F. 1983. Transmission of tomato ringspot virus from dandelion via seed and dagger nematodes. Plant Dis. 67:867868.Google Scholar
7. Nickell, L. G. 1982. Plant growth regulators: agricultural uses. p. 34. Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
8. Powell, C. A., Forer, L. B., and Stouffer, R. F. 1982. Reservoirs of tomato ringspot virus in fruit orchards. Plant Dis. 66:583584.Google Scholar
9. Smith, S. H., Stouffer, R. F., and Soulen, D. M. 1973. Induction of stem pitting in peaches by mechanical inoculation with tomato ringspot virus. Phytopathology 63:14041406.Google Scholar
10. Stott, K. G. 1967. The effects of competition from ground covers on apple vigor and yield. Proc. Assoc. Appl. Biol. 3:327330.Google Scholar
11. Stouffer, R. F. 1977. Association of tomato ringspot virus with graft union necrosis in apple. Compact Tree Fruit 10:3537.Google Scholar
12. Watschke, T. L. 1976. Growth regulation of Kentucky bluegrass with several growth retardants. Agron. J. 68:787791.Google Scholar
13. Watschke, T. L., Long, F. W., and Duich, J. M. 1979. Control of Poe annua by suppression of seedheads with growth regulators. Weeds 27:224231.Google Scholar
14. Welker, W. V., and Glenn, D. M. 1985. The relationship of sod proximity to the growth and nutrient composition of newly planted peach trees. HortScience 20:417418.Google Scholar