Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T14:41:02.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pest Management Implications of Glyphosate-Resistant Wheat (Triticum aestivum) in the Western United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Drew J. Lyon ,
Alvin J. Bussan ,
John O. Evans ,
Carol A. Mallory-Smith  and
Thomas F. Peeper
Drew J. Lyon*
Affiliation:
University of Nebraska Panhandle Research and Extension Center, 4502 Avenue I, Scottsbluff, NE 69361
Alvin J. Bussan
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison, WI 53706
John O. Evans
Affiliation:
Plants, Soils & Biometeorology Department, Utah State University, 4820 Old Main Hill, Logan UT 84322-4820
Carol A. Mallory-Smith
Affiliation:
Crop & Soil Science, 107 Crop Science Building, Corvallis, OR 97331-3002
Thomas F. Peeper
Affiliation:
Plant and Soil Sciences Department, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74074
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Glyphosate-resistant crop species have increased in number over the past decade as growers eagerly adopt this simple and effective weed management technology. Glyphosate-resistant wheat cultivars are being developed and may soon be available to growers. The objective of this paper is to discuss the pest management implications of glyphosate-resistant wheat in the western United States, a region stretching from the Great Plains to the Pacific Ocean that produces more than 80% of the nation's wheat crop. The benefits of glyphosate-resistant wheat include: (1) improved weed control, particularly of difficult-to-control weeds, such as winter annual grasses belonging to the Aegilops, Avena, Bromus, Lolium, Poa, Secale, and Setaria genera; (2) an ability to control weeds resistant to currently available wheat herbicides; (3) an extended application window for control of late-emerging weeds; and (4) improved crop safety. Although these benefits are not to be minimized, they need to be considered in the light of the concerns surrounding this new technology in wheat. These concerns are about (1) the lack of an equally effective and affordable herbicide to control glyphosate-resistant volunteer wheat, which may increase wheat diseases such as wheat streak mosaic and Rhizoctonia root rot; (2) the possibility that overreliance on glyphosate will lead to species shifts, with unknown consequences for weed management in wheat; and (3) the use of multiple glyphosate-resistant crops in rotation with glyphosate-resistant wheat, which could rapidly increase glyphosate-resistant weeds, thereby limiting the future utility of glyphosate. If, or when, glyphosate-resistant wheat becomes commercially available, it will require careful management to sustain its usefulness. We have proposed several areas of research that we feel are critical to help develop sound management guidelines for deployment and use of this new weed management technology in wheat. These include (1) developing effective “green bridge” management strategies, i.e., using cultural and chemical approaches to control plants that sustain insect vector populations between wheat crop periods; (2) predicting potential weed species shifts resulting from the use of glyphosate-resistant wheat; and (3) developing management systems that include herbicide-resistant wheat on a rotational basis and rotating the use of glyphosate with other weed management strategies in the fallow period to minimize the potential development of glyphosate-resistant weeds or weed communities.

Keywords

GlyphosateRhizoctonia root rot, Rhizoctonia solani Kühnwheat, Triticum aestivum L.Herbicide-resistant cropswheat streak mosaic virusACCase, acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase (EC 6.4.1.2)ALS, acetolactate synthase (EC 4.1.3.18)
Type
Education/Extension
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , September 2002 , pp. 680 - 690
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Adkins, S. W., Tanpipat, S., Swarbrick, J. T., and Boersma, M. 1998a. Influence of environmental factors on glyphosate efficacy when applied to Avena or Urochloa panicoides . Weed Res. 38: 129–138.Google Scholar
Adkins, S. W., Tanpipat, S., Swarbrick, J. T., and Boersma, M. 1998b. The influence of soil moisture content on glyphosate efficacy for the control of annual grasses in fallow land. Weed Res. 38: 119–127.Google Scholar
Appleby, A. P. and Morrow, L. A. 1990. The Pacific Northwest. In Donald, W. W., ed. Systems of Weed Control in Wheat in North America. Monograph 6. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. pp. 200–232.Google Scholar
Ball, D. A. and Miller, S. D. 1993. Cropping history, tillage, and herbage effects on weed flora composition in irrigated corn. Agron. J. 85: 817–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartley, M. R. 1993. Assessment of herbicide selectivity. In Streibig, J. C. and Kudsk, P., eds. Herbicide Bioassays. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 57–73.Google Scholar
Baughman, T. A. and Shaw, D. R. 1995. Early preemergence and preemergence herbicide combinations in stale-seedbed soybean. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48: 84–85.Google Scholar
Beck, K. G., Sebastian, J. R., and Chapman, P. L. 1995. Jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) and downy brome (Bromus tectorum) control in perennial grasses. Weed Technol. 9: 255–259.Google Scholar
Bingham, S. W., Segura, J., and Foy, C. L. 1980. Susceptibility of several grasses to glyphosate. Weed Sci. 28: 579–585.Google Scholar
Burnside, O. C. 1992. Rationale for developing herbicide-resistant crops. Weed Technol. 6: 621–625.Google Scholar
Casely, J. C. and Coupland, D. 1985. Environmental and plant factors affecting glyphosate uptake, movement and activity. In Grossbeard, E. and Atkinson, D., eds. The Herbicide Glyphosate. Boston, MA: Butterworths. pp. 92–123.Google Scholar
[CAST] Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. 1991. Herbicide-Resistant Crops. Ames, IA: CAST.Google Scholar
[CAST] Council for Agricultural Science and Technology. 1999. Applications of Biotechnology to Crops: Benefits and Risks. Issue Paper 12. Ames, IA: CAST.Google Scholar
Cook, R. J. and Veseth, R. J. 1991. Wheat health management before planting. In Wheat Health Management. St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological Society. pp. 87–104.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., Giminez, A. E., York, A. C., Batts, R. B., and Wilcut, J. W. 2001. Morningglory (Ipomoea spp.) and large crabgrass (Digitaria sanquinalis) control with glyphosate and 2,4-DB mixtures in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 15: 56–61.Google Scholar
de Ruiter, H. and Meinen, E. 1998. Influence of water stress and surfactant on the efficacy, absorption, and translocation of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 46: 289–296.Google Scholar
Evans, J. O. and Gunnell, R. W. 1985. A Preliminary Comparison of Field Bindweed and Wild Oat Response to Varying Formulations of Glyphosate and Sulfosate. Research Progress Rep. of the Western Society of Weed Science. 2 p.Google Scholar
Feng, P. C C., Pratley, J. E., and Bohn, J. A. 1999. Resistance to glyphosate in Lolium rigidum. II. Uptake, translocation, and metabolism. Weed Sci. 47: 412–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franz, J. E., Mao, M. K., and Sikorski, J. A. 1997. Glyphosate: A Unique Global Herbicide. Monograph 189. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society. 653 p.Google Scholar
Gamroth, D. M., Brewster, B. D., and Mallory-Smith, C. A. 1997. Herbicide Banding in Grass Seed Crops. Research Progress Rep. of the Western Society of Weed Science. 88 p.Google Scholar
Gaskin, R. E. and Stevens, P. J. G. 1993. Antagonism of the foliar uptake of glyphosate into grasses by organosilicone surfactants. Part 1: effects of plant species, formulation, concentrations, and timing of applications. Pestic. Sci. 38: 185–192.Google Scholar
Goldburg, R. J. 1992. Environmental concerns with the development of herbicide-tolerant plants. Weed Technol. 6: 647–652.Google Scholar
Grossbeard, E. and Atkinson, D. 1985. The Herbicide Glyphosate. Boston, MA: Butterworths. 490 p.Google Scholar
Hanavan, D. 1998. National jointed goatgrass research program. 1st Proceeding of the National Wheat Industry Research Forum; January 14–15, 1998; San Diego, CA. Washington, DC: NAWG Foundation. p. 1.Google Scholar
Heap, I. 2001. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. Available at http://www.weedscience.com. Accessed: August 6, 2001.Google Scholar
Hilton, H. W. 1957. Herbicide Tolerant Strains of Weeds. Hawaii Sugar Plantation Association Annual Rep. 69.Google Scholar
Jensen, S. G., Lane, L. C., and Seifers, D. L. 1996. A new disease of maize and wheat in the High Plains. Plant Dis. 80: 1387–1390.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. J. 1976. Glyphosate for weed control in dormant bermudagrass. Weed Sci. 24: 140–143.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Griffin, J. L., Clay, P. A., Vidrine, P. R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1997. Influence of application variables on efficacy of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 11: 354–362.Google Scholar
Joseph, O. O., Hobbs, S. L. A., and Jana, S. 1990. Diclofop resistance in wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci. 38: 475–479.Google Scholar
Koscelny, J. A. and Peeper, T. F. 1997. Herbicides for winter hardy wild oat (Avena fatua) control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 11: 35–38.Google Scholar
Koscelny, J. A., Peeper, T. F., and Krenzer, E. G. Jr. 1996. Sulfonylurea herbicides affect hard red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) forage and grain yield. Weed Technol. 10: 531–534.Google Scholar
Madsen, K. H. and Streibig, J. C. 2000. Simulating weed management in glyphosate-tolerant crops: greenhouse and field studies. Pest Manag. Sci. 56: 340–344.Google Scholar
Mallory-Smith, C. A., Hansen, J., and Zemetra, R. S. 1996. Gene transfer between wheat and Aegilops cylindrica . Proceedings of the 2nd International Weed Control Congress; June 25–28, 1996; Copenhagen. Flakkebjerg, Slagelse, Denmark: Department of Weed Control and Pesticide Ecology. pp. 441–445.Google Scholar
Mallory-Smith, C. and Hyslop, G. R. 1999. Herbicide-resistant crops: issues, impacts, and implications. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 52: 3–6.Google Scholar
Mallory-Smith, C. A., Thill, D. C., and Dial, M. J. 1990. Identification of sulfonylurea herbicide-resistant prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola). Weed Technol. 4: 163–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, H. A. and Cleland, E. E. 2001. The evolutionary impact of invasive species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 5446–5451.Google Scholar
[NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service. 1999. 1997 Census of Agriculture: Geographic Area Series. Volumes 1, 1A, 1B, 1C. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture. Web page: http://www.nass.usda.gov/census/. Accessed: August 3, 2001.Google Scholar
Ogg, A. G. Jr. and Isakson, P. J. 2001. Agronomic benefits and concerns for Roundup-Ready® wheat. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 54: 80–90.Google Scholar
Peairs, F. B. 1998. Cultural control tactics for management of the Russian wheat aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae). In Quisenberry, S. S. and Peairs, F. B., eds. Proceedings of Thomas Say Publications in Entomology: Response Model for an Introduced Pest—The Russian Wheat Aphid. Lanham, MD: Entomological Society of America. pp. 288–296.Google Scholar
Powles, S. B., Lorraine-Colwill, D. F., Dellow, J. J., and Preston, C. 1998. Evolved resistance to glyphosate in rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in Australia. Weed Sci. 46: 604–607.Google Scholar
Pratley, J., Baines, P., Eberbach, P., Incerti, M., and Broster, J. 1996. Glyphosate resistance in annual ryegrass. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the Grasslands Society. p. 122. New South Wales, Australia.Google Scholar
Primiani, M. M., Cotterman, J. C., and Saari, L. L. 1990. Resistance of kochia (Kochia scoparia) to sulfonylurea and imidazolinone herbicides. Weed Technol. 4: 169–172.Google Scholar
Radosevich, S. R., Ghersa, C. M., and Comstock, G. 1992. Concerns a weed scientist might have about herbicide-tolerant crops. Weed Technol. 6: 635–639.Google Scholar
Rainbolt, C. R. and Thill, D. C. 2001. Control of Volunteer Glyphosate-Resistant Spring Wheat and Other Weeds with Glyphosate and Grass Herbicides. 2001 Research Progress Rep. of the Western Society of Weed Science. pp. 96–97.Google Scholar
Rauch, T. A. and Thill, D. C. 2001. Weed Control in Glyphosate Resistant Spring Wheat. 2001 Res. Prog. Research Progress Rep. of the Western Society of Weed Science. 140 p.Google Scholar
Segura, J., Bingham, S. W., and Foy, C. L. 1978. Phytotoxicity of glyphosate to Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) and red clover (Trifolium pratense). Weed Sci. 26: 32–40.Google Scholar
Seifers, D. L., Harvey, T. L., Martin, T. J., and Jensen, S. G. 1997. Identification of the wheat curl mite as the vector of the high plains virus of corn and wheat. Plant Dis. 81: 1161–1166.Google Scholar
Slykhuis, J. T. 1955. Aceria tulipae Keifer (Acarina: Eriophyidae) in relation to the spread of wheat streak mosaic. Phytopathology 45: 116–128.Google Scholar
Smiley, R. W., Ogg, A. G. Jr.,, and Cook, R. J. 1992. Influence of glyphosate on Rhizoctonia root rot, growth, and yield of barley. Plant Dis. 76: 937–942.Google Scholar
Stanger, C. E. and Appleby, A. P. 1989. Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) accessions tolerant to diclofop. Weed Sci. 37: 350–352.Google Scholar
Streibig, J. C., Rudemo, M., and Jensen, J. E. 1993. Dose–response curves and statistical models. In Streibig, J. C. and Kudsk, P., eds. Herbicide Bioassays. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. pp. 29–55.Google Scholar
Taylor, J. M. and Coats, G. E. 1995. Vegetation management on highway rights-of-way with sulfonylurea-resistant Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48: 154–255.Google Scholar
Thompson, C. R. and Thill, D. C. 1993. Weed Control in Fallow with Two Glyphosate Formulations and Various Surfactants. 1993 Research Progress Rep. of the Western Society of Weed Science. pp. III100–III102.Google Scholar
Tran, M., Baerson, S., and Brinker, R. et al. 1999. Characterization of glyphosate resistant Eleusine indica biotypes from Malaysia. Proc. 17th Asian Pac. Weed Sci. Soc. Conf. I:(B). 527–536.Google Scholar
Tucker, E. S. and Powles, S. B. 1988. Occurrence and distribution in south-eastern Australia of barley grass (Hordeum glaucum Steud.) resistant to paraquat. Plant Prot. Q. 3: 19–21.Google Scholar
VanGessel, M. J. 2001. Glyphosate-resistant horseweed from Delaware. Weed Sci. 49: 703–705.Google Scholar
Voth, R. D. and Downs, J. P. 1984. Weed control in dormant turf grass with glyphosate. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 37: 15–20.Google Scholar
Walenta, D. L. and Ball, D. A. 1997. Weed Control in Seedling Tall Fescue with Primisulfuron. 1997 Research Progress Rep. of the Western Society of Weed Science. 79 p.Google Scholar
Wang, Z., Zemetra, R. S., Hansen, J., and Mallory-Smith, C. A. 2001. The fertility of wheat × jointed goatgrass hybrid and its backcross progenies. Weed Sci. 49: 340–345.Google Scholar
Wehrenburg, E. 1999. Congressional Leaders Urge Action on Wheat Cleaning. The Inside Scoop, 3 May 1999. Enid, OK: Oklahoma Wheat Growers Association.Google Scholar
Wehrenburg, E. 2000. Grain Cleaning Options Still under Consideration. The Inside Scoop, 24 Mar. 2000. Enid, OK: Oklahoma Wheat Growers Association.Google Scholar
Weston, L. A. 1990. Cover crop and herbicide influence on row crop seedling establishment in no-tillage culture. Weed Sci. 38: 166–171.Google Scholar
Whitson, T. D., Swearingen, R. J., Fink, G. E., and Lauer, A. 1993. The Effects of Successive Herbicide Applications for Control of Downy Brome (Bromus tectorum) in Rangeland. 1993 Research Progress Rep. of the Western Society of Weed Science. pp. I9–11.Google Scholar
Wicks, G. A. 1985. Weed control in conservation tillage systems—small grains. In Wiese, A. F., ed. Weed Control in Limited Tillage Systems. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. Monograph 2. pp. 77–92.Google Scholar
Wicks, G. A., Martin, D. A., and Mahnken, G. W. 1995. Cultural practices in wheat (Triticum aestivum), on weeds in subsequent fallow and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor). Weed Sci. 43: 434–444.Google Scholar
Wicks, G. A. and Smika, D. E. 1990. Central Great Plains. In Donald, W. W., ed. Systems of Weed Control in Wheat in North America. Monograph 6. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. pp. 127–157.Google Scholar
Wiese, M. V. 1987. Wheat streak mosiac. In Compendium of Wheat Diseases. 2nd ed. St. Paul, MN: APS Press. pp. 80–81.Google Scholar
Wiese, A. F., Salisbury, C. D., and Bean, B. W. 1995. Downy brome (Bromus tectorum), jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica) and horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control in fallow. Weed Technol. 9: 249–254.Google Scholar
Wille, M. J. and Morishita, D. W. 2001. Evaluation of glyphosate products for volunteer wheat and broadleaf weed control in fallow. 2001 Research Progres Rep. of the Western Society of Weed Science. pp. 106–107.Google Scholar
Woodburn, A. T. 2000. Glyphosate: production, pricing and use worldwide. Pest Manag. Sci. 56: 309–312.Google Scholar
Zemetra, R. S., Hansen, J., and Mallory-Smith, C. A. 1998. Potential for gene transfer between wheat (Triticum aestivum) and jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica). Weed Sci. 46: 313–317.Google Scholar