Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:12:14.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Persian Darnel (Lolium persicum) Fecundity Response to Spring Wheat, Canola, and Sunflower Interference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Johnathon D. Holman ,
Alvin J. Bussan ,
Bruce D. Maxwell ,
Perry R. Miller  and
James A. Mickelson
Johnathon D. Holman*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Entomological Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID 83844-2339
Alvin J. Bussan
Affiliation:
Horticulture Department, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706-1590
Bruce D. Maxwell
Affiliation:
Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717
Perry R. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717
James A. Mickelson
Affiliation:
Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., Johnston, IA 50131
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Persian darnel control options are limited and unmanaged populations can cause substantial crop yield loss. Integrating crop diversification and higher crop seeding rates into a cropping system might improve Persian darnel management. Field experiments were conducted to determine the effect of different crops and increased crop seeding rates on Persian darnel fecundity. Persian darnel produced up to 2,800 seeds per plant and 53,000 seeds/m2 when grown without competition. Increasing crop density reduced Persian darnel tillers per plant, seed weight, and fecundity. Increasing crop density reduced Persian darnel fecundity 0.4 to 0.2% per spring wheat plant, 0.6 to 0.1% per canola plant, and 16 to 8% per sunflower plant. Persian darnel fecundity was impacted the greatest by reduced weed seedling establishment, which was caused by crop competition and seeding sunflower late in the spring preceded by a nonselective herbicide application. Results indicated delaying the seeding of spring crops or including a late-seeded warm season crop, like sunflower or safflower, in the cropping system is an effective weed management tool for reducing Persian darnel fecundity.

Keywords

GlyphosatePersian darnel, Lolium persicum Boiss. & Hoh. # LOLPScanola, Brassica napus Kochspring wheat, Triticum aestivum L.sunflower, Helianthus annuus L.Fecunditypreplant herbicideseedling establishmentseeding dateseeding ratestale seedbedweed interferenceyield components
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , June 2006 , pp. 430 - 437
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Banting, J. D. and Gebhardt, J. P. 1979. Germination, afterripening, emergence, persistence, and control of Persian darnel. Can. J. Plant Sci. 59:1037–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bussan, A. J. and Dietz-Holmes, M. 2000. Persian darnel (Lolium persicum) competition and management in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). in WSSA Abstracts. Toronto, Canada: Proceeding of the Weed Seed Society of America. 40(138). Pp. 57.Google Scholar
Cousens, R. D., Brain, P., O'Donovan, J. T., and O'Sullivan, P. 1987. The use of biologically realistic equations to describe the effects of weed density and relative time of emergence on crop yield. Weed Sci. 35:720–725.Google Scholar
Dardanelli, J. L., Bachmeier, O. A., Sereno, R., and Gil, R. 1997. Rooting depth and soil water extraction patterns of different crops in a silty loam Haplustoll. Field Crops Res. 54:29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwent, A. L. and Smith, J. H. 1985. Delayed seeding for wild oat control in rapeseed. Can. J. Plant Sci. 65:1101–1106.Google Scholar
Dedio, W. 1985. Effects of seeding and harvesting dates on yield and oil quality of sunflower cultivars. Can. J. Plant Sci. 65:299–305.Google Scholar
Doucet, C., Weaver, S. E., Hamill, A. S., and Zhang, J. 1999. Separating the effects of crop rotation from weed management on weed density and diversity. Weed Sci. 47:729–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hashem, A., Radosevich, S. R., and Roush, M. L. 1998. Effect of proximity factors on competition between winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). Weed Sci. 46:181–190.Google Scholar
Holman, J. D. 2002. Quantification of Persian darnel (Lolium persicum) Interference in Monoculture, Spring Wheat, Canola and Sunflower. M.Sc. thesis. Montana State University, Bozeman, MT.Google Scholar
Holman, J. D., Bussan, A., Maxwell, B., Miller, P., and Mickelson, J. 2004. Spring wheat, canola, and sunflower response to Persian darnel (Lolium persicum) interference. Weed Technol. 18:509–520.Google Scholar
Holt, N. W. and Campbell, S. J. 1984. Effect of plant density on the agronomic performance of sunflower on dryland. Can. J. Plant Sci. 64:599–605.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. H. 1995. Control of Persian darnel (Lolium persicum) and other grasses with clethodim. Weed Technol. 9:432–439.Google Scholar
Jaafar, M. N., Stone, L. R., and Goodrum, D. E. 1993. Rooting depth and dry matter development of sunflower. Agron. J. 85:281–286.Google Scholar
Jasieniuk, M., Maxwell, B., Anderson, R., Evans, J., Lyon, D., Miller, S., Morishita, D., Ogg, A. Jr., Seefeldt, S., and Stahlman, P. 1999. Site-to-site and year-to-year variation in Triticum aestivum–Aegilops cylindrica interference relationships. Weed Sci. 47:529–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kropff, M. J. and Spitters, C. J. T. 1991. A simple model of crop loss by weed competition from early observations on relative leaf area of the weeds. Weed Res. 31:97–105.Google Scholar
Legere, A. and Samson, N. 1999. Relative influence of crop rotation, tillage, and weed management on weed associations in spring barley cropping systems. Weed Sci. 47:112–122.Google Scholar
Lutman, P. J. W., Dixon, F. L., and Risiott, R. 1994. The response of four spring-sown combinable arable crops to weed competition. Weed Res. 34:137–146.Google Scholar
McGiffen, M. E., Forcella, F., Lindstrom, M., and Reicosky, D. 1997. Covariance of cropping systems and foxtail density as predictors of weed interference. Weed Sci. 45:388–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mickelson, J. A. and Harvey, R. G. 1999. Effects of Eriochloa villosa density and time of emergence on growth and seed production in Zea mays . Weed Sci. 47:687–692.Google Scholar
Montana Agricultural Statistical Service. 2004. Montana Agricultural Statistics for 1999–2000. U.S. Department of Agriculture National Agricultural Statistics Service. Volume 38.Google Scholar
Morrison, M. J., McVetty, P. B. E., and Scarth, R. 1990. Effect of row spacing and seeding rates on summer rape in southern Manitoba. Can J. Plant Sci. 70:127–137.Google Scholar
O'Donovan, J. T. 1994. Canola (Brassica rapa) plant density influences Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum) interference, biomass, and seed yield. Weed Sci. 42:385–389.Google Scholar
O'Donovan, J. T., de St. Remy, E. A., O'Sullivan, P., Dew, D., and Sharma, A. 1985. Influence of the relative time of emergence of wild oat (Avena fatua) on yield loss of barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 33:498–503.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. T. 1995. Effects of environmental stress on weed/crop interactions. Weed Sci. 43:483–490.Google Scholar
Radosevich, S. R. 1987. Methods to study interactions among crops and weeds. Weed Technol. 1:190–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radosevich, S. R., Holt, J., and Ghersa, C. 1997. Weed Ecology: Implications for Management. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Rardon, P. and Fay, P. 1995. Controlling Persian Darnel. Montana Agricultural Experiment Station Capsule Information Series 23.Google Scholar
Sagar, G. R. and Mortimer, A. M. 1976. An approach to the study of the population dynamics of plants with special reference to weeds. Ann. Appl. Biol. 1:1–47.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 8. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Stone, M. J., Cralle, H. T., Chandler, J. M., Miller, T. D., Bovey, R. W., and Carson, K. H. 1998. Above- and belowground interference of wheat (Triticum aestivum) by Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum). Weed Sci. 46:438–441.Google Scholar
Weaver, S. E., Kropff, M. J., and Cousens, R. 1994. A simulation model of competition between winter wheat and Avena fatua for light. Ann. Appl. Biol. 124:315–331.Google Scholar
Weed Science Organization. 2002. Online. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds: Web page: http://www.weedscience.org/m.asp. Accessed: April 9, 2002.Google Scholar
Young, F. L., Ogg, A. G. Jr., Thill, D. C., Young, D. L., and Papendick, R. L. 1996. Weed management for crop production in the northwest wheat (Triticum aestivum) region. Weed Sci. 44:429–436.Google Scholar
Zadok, J. C., Chang, T. T., and Konzak, C. F. 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 14:415–421.Google Scholar
Ziska, L. H. 2001. Changes in competitive ability between a C4 crop and a C3 weed with elevated carbon dioxide. Weed Sci. 49:622–627.Google Scholar