Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:53:30.159Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Performance of Colletotrichum dematium for the Control of Fireweed (Epilobium angustifolium) Improved with Formulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Christian Léger
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science, McGill University, 21,111 Lakeshore Road, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, Canada H9X 3V9
Steven G. Hallett
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science, McGill University, 21,111 Lakeshore Road, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, Canada H9X 3V9
Alan K. Watson*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Science, McGill University, 21,111 Lakeshore Road, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, Canada H9X 3V9
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

The potential of Colletotrichum dematium f.sp. epilobii (ATCC 20981) to control fireweed (Epilobium angustifolium) was investigated. Under controlled environment conditions, plant age, inoculum density, length of the dew period, and temperature during the dew period affected the efficacy of C. dematium f.sp. epilobii. Seedlings sprayed with 1 × 109 conidia/m2 sustained the most damage. Susceptibility decreased with increasing plant age, and 10-wk-old plants were slightly affected by the fungus. Satisfactory levels of control were achieved when the dew period was >20 h and temperature during the dew period was 30 C. Control of fireweed increased when the C. dematium f.sp. epilobii conidia were suspended in a 25% v/v canola oil/water emulsion. Using this formulation, control of 4-wk-old seedlings was obtained with a 10-fold reduction in inoculum concentration (1 × 108 conidia/m2), the required dew period was reduced to 12 h, and the effect of the temperature during the dew period was minimized. In the field, C. dematium f.sp. epilobii alone or when amended with an oil emulsion failed to control fireweed growth. When the oil formulation of C. dematium f.sp. epilobii was tank mixed with a low rate of glyphosate, high levels of control were consistently achieved. Growth reduction achieved with this formulation was more than additive, suggesting a synergistic interaction. The effectiveness of the formulated conidial suspension of C. dematium f.sp. epilobii decreased with plant maturity, and 15-wk-old plants were not controlled. C. dematium f.sp. epilobii alone has limited potential as a candidate bioherbicide, but when formulated in an oil/water emulsion and combined with low rates of glyphosate, suppression of fireweed can be attained in the field.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address: Syngenta Crop Protection Inc., 140 Research Lane, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 4Z3
Current address: Department of Botany & Plant Pathology, 1155 Lilly Hall of Life Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-1155

References

Literature Cited

Altman, J., Neate, S., and Rovira, A. D. 1990. Herbicide-pathogen interactions and mycoherbicides as alternative strategies for weed control. In Hoagland, R. E., ed. Microbes and Microbial Products. ACS Symposium Ser. 439. Washington, D.C.: American Chemical Society. pp. 240259.Google Scholar
Amsellem, Z., Sharon, A., and Gressel, J. 1991. Abolition of selectivity of two mycoherbicidal organisms and enhanced virulence of avirulent fungi by an invert emulsion. Phytopathology 81: 985988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amsellem, Z., Sharon, A., Gressel, J., and Quimby, P. C. Jr. 1990. Complete abolition of high inoculum threshold of two mycoherbicides (Alternaria cassiae and A. crassa) when applied in invert emulsion. Phytopathology 80: 925929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archambault, L., Morissette, J., and Bernier-Cardou, M. 1998. Forest succession over a 20-year period following clearcutting in balsam fir-yellow birch ecosystems of eastern Quebec, Canada. For. Ecol. Manag. 102: 6174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auld, B. A. 1993. Vegetable oil suspension emulsions reduce dew dependence of a mycoherbicide. Crop Prot. 12: 477479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartos, D. L., Brown, J. K., and Booth, G. D. 1994. Twelve years biomass response in aspen communities following fire. J. Range Manag. 47: 7983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartos, D. L. and Mueggler, W. F. 1981. Early succession in aspen communities following fire in Western Wyoming. J. Range Manag. 34: 315318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyette, C. D., Quimby, P. C. Jr., Connick, W. J. Jr., Daigle, D. J., and Fulgham, F. E. 1990. The biocontrol efficacy of Colletotrichum truncatum (Schw.) Andrus & Moore for control of hemp sesbania [Sesbania exaltata (Raf.) Cory.] is improved with an emulsifiable invert formulation. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 30:50.Google Scholar
Daigle, D. J., Connick, W. J. Jr., Quimby, P. C. Jr., Evans, J., Trask-Morrell, B., and Fulgham, F. E. 1990. Invert emulsion: carrier and water source for the mycoherbicide, Alternaria cassiae . Weed Technol. 4: 327331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyrness, C. T. 1973. Early stages of plant succession following logging and burning in the Western Cascades of Oregon. Ecology 54: 5769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eis, S. 1981. Effect of vegetative competition on regeneration of white spruce. Can. J. For. Res. 11: 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friend, J. 1985. Phenolic substances and plant disease. In Van Sumere, C. F. and Lea, P. J., eds. The Biochemistry of Plant Phenolics. Volume 25. Annu. Proc. Phytochem. Soc. of Europe. Oxford: Clarendon Press. pp. 367392.Google Scholar
Gomez, K. A. and Gomez, A. A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd ed. Singapore: J. Wiley. 680 p.Google Scholar
Gouvernement du Québec. 1991. Un projet de stratégie—Aménager pour mieux protéger les forêts. Charlesbourg, QC, Canada: Direction des Communications, Min. de l’Énergie et Ressources. 151 p.Google Scholar
Hallett, S. 1993. Integration of bioherbicides into production systems. In Campagna, J. P. and Touchette, R., eds. Proc. Annu. Meeting of the Canadian Forest Nursery Weed Management Association. July 12-14, 1993, Berthierville, QC, Canada. pp. 3341.Google Scholar
Heiny, D. K. and Templeton, G. E. 1991. Effects of spore concentration, temperature, and dew period on disease of field bindweed caused by Phoma proboscis . Phytopathology 81: 905909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoagland, R. E. 1996. Chemical interactions with herbicides to improve efficacy. Weed Technol. 10: 651674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hull, H. H., Davis, D. G., and Stolzenberg, G. E. 1982. Action of adjuvants on plant surfaces. In Hodgson, R. H., ed. Adjuvants for Herbicides. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. pp. 2666.Google Scholar
Johnston, M. H. and Elliott, J. A. 1996. Impacts of logging and wildfire on an upland black spruce community in northwestern Ontario. Environ. Mont. Assess. 39: 283297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McRae, C. F. and Auld, B. A. 1988. The influence of environmental factors on anthracnose of Xanthium spinosum . Phytopathology 78: 11821186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quimby, P. C. Jr., Fulgham, F. E., Boyette, D. C., Hoagland, R. E., and Connick, W. J. Jr. 1989. An invert emulsion replaces dew in biocontrol of sicklepod—a preliminary study. In Hovdes, D. A. and Beestman, G. B., eds. Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems. Volume 8. ASTM STP 980. Philadelphia, PA: American Society of Testing Materials. pp. 264270.Google Scholar
Robinson, R. G. and Nelson, W. W. 1975. Vegetable oil replacements for petroleum oil adjuvants in herbicide sprays. Econ. Bot. 29: 146151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1987. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.Google Scholar
Sharon, A., Amsellem, Z., and Gressel, J. 1992. Glyphosate suppression of an elicited defense response: increased susceptibility of Cassia obtusifolia to a mycoherbicide. Plant Physiol. 98: 654659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
TeBeest, D. O., Templeton, G. E., and Smith, R. J. Jr. 1978. Temperature and moisture requirements for development of anthracnose on northern jointvetch. Phytopathology 68: 389393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. G. and Zasada, J. C. 1991. Integrating plant autecology and silvicultural activities to prevent forest vegetation management problems. For. Chron. 67: 506513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, H. L. 1981. Factors affecting biological control of spurred anoda (Anoda cristata) with Alternaria macrospora . Weed Sci. 30: 505507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, H. L. and Riley, J. A. 1982. Evaluation of Alternaria cassiae for the biocontrol of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia). Weed Sci. 30: 651654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walstad, J. D. 1988. Forest vegetation management: moving toward ecologies of scale. Northwest Environ. J. 4: 199212.Google Scholar
Watson, A. K. and Wall, R. E. 1995. Mycoherbicides: their role in vegetation management in Canadian forests. In Charest, P. J. and Duchesne, L. C., compilers. Recent Progress in Forest Biotechnology in Canada. Chalk River, ON, Canada: Petawawa National Forest Institute, Canadian Forest Service, Information Rep. PI-X-120. pp. 7482.Google Scholar
Winder, R. S. and Watson, A. K. 1994. A potential microbial control for fireweed (Epilobium angustifolium). Phytoprotection 75: 1933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wymore, L. A. and Watson, A. K. 1986. An adjuvant increases survival and efficacy of Colletotrichum coccodes, a mycoherbicide for velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Phytopathology 76: 11151116.Google Scholar
Wymore, L. A. and Watson, A. K. 1989. Interaction between a velvetleaf isolate of Colletotrichum coccodes and thidiazuron for velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) control in the field. Weed Sci. 37: 478483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, S.-M., Johnson, D. R., Dowler, W. M., and Connick, W. J. Jr. 1993. Infection of leafy spurge by Alternaria alternata and A. angustiovoidea in the absence of dew. Phytopathology 83: 953958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar