Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T03:02:02.848Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nicosulfuron, Primisulfuron, Imazethapyr, and DPX-PE350 Injury to Succeeding Crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David H. Johnson
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
David L. Jordan
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
William G. Johnson
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Ronald E. Talbert
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
Robert E. Frans
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701

Abstract

Nicosulfuron (50 and 100 g ai ha−1), primisulfuron (40 and 80 g ai ha−1), imazethapyr (70 and 140 g ai ha-1), and DPX-PE350 (100 and 200 g ai ha-1) injury to corn, cotton, grain sorghum, rice, and soybean was evaluated at Fayetteville, AR, during 1989-90 and 1990-91. The crops were planted 0, 1, 2, 4, 8, 14 or 16, and 52 wk after herbicide application. Visible injury to all crops declined as the time interval increased. No visible injury was observed to any crop planted at least 14 wk after nicosulfuron or primisulfuron application, or 52 wk after DPX-PE350 application. Imazethapyr injured all crops except soybean at the 52-wk interval in 1990 but not in 1989.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Camancho, R. F., Moshier, L. J., Morishita, D. W., and Devlin, D. L. 1991. Rhizome johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in corn (Zea mays) with primisulfuron and nicosulfuron. Weed Technol. 5:789794.Google Scholar
2. Foy, C. L. and Witt, H. L. 1990. Johnsongrass control with DPX-V9360 and CGA-136872 in corn (Zea mays) in Virginia. Weed Technol. 4:615619.Google Scholar
3. Frans, R. E., Jordan, D. L., Johnson, D. H., Johnson, W. G., and Talbert, R. E. 1991. Carryover potential of KIH-8921 to rotational crops. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod.—Res. Conf. 1991:952953.Google Scholar
4. Kells, J. J., Leep, R. H., Tesar, M. B., Leavitt, R. A., and Cudnohufsky, J. 1990. Effect of atrazine and tillage on alfalfa (Medicago sativa) establishment in corn (Zea mays)—alfalfa rotation. Weed Technol. 4:360365.Google Scholar
5. Mills, J. A. and Witt, W. W. 1989. Efficacy, phytotoxicity, and persistence of imazaquin, imazethapyr, and clomazone in no-till double-crop soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37:353359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Mitchell, W. H., Crowder, S. H., and Williams, C. S. 1992. “Staple”—A new cotton herbicide from du Pont. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Prod.—Res. Conf. 1992:1318.Google Scholar
7. Monks, C. D. and Banks, P. A. 1991. Rotational crop response to chlorimuron, clomazone, and imazaquin applied the previous year. Weed Sci. 39:629633.Google Scholar
8. Talbert, R. E., Oliver, L. R., Frans, R. E., Johnson, D. H., Wichert, R. A., Kendig, J. A., Ruff, D. F., and McCarty, J. T. 1990. Field screening of new chemicals for herbicidal activity—1989. Ark. Agric. Exp. Sta. Res. Ser. 396. 22 p.Google Scholar