Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:42:07.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Management as Influenced by Herbicide Selection and Application Timing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Dennis B. Johnson  and
Jason K. Norsworthy
Dennis B. Johnson*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, 1366 West Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
Jason K. Norsworthy
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, 1366 West Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 2009 and 2012 at Fayetteville, AR, to compare four herbicides across three application timings for johnsongrass control and to evaluate the effect of late-season herbicide applications on johnsongrass control, fecundity, seed viability, and progeny emergence. In the first experiment, glyphosate at 840 g ae ha−1 and clethodim at 68 and 136 g ai ha−1 provided 75 to 94% control of 15- to 60-cm tall johnsongrass and up to 98% stand reduction 4 wk after treatment (WAT). Glufosinate and nicosulfuron were generally effective on ≤30-cm tall johnsongrass; however, efficacy declined as johnsongrass size increased. In the second experiment, glyphosate at 840 g ha−1 provided at least 89% johnsongrass control when applied at boot or after panicle emergence and up to 95% stand reduction 3 WAT. Applications of glyphosate at 420 and 840 g ha−1, clethodim at 68 and 136 g ha−1, and glufosinate at 740 g ai ha−1 at the boot stage reduced viable seed production of treated plants 94 to 99%. Irrespective of rate, glyphosate and clethodim applied at boot stage reduced progeny emergence by 77 to 95% and 100-seed weight of treated plants 62 to 96% compared to the nontreated check. This research demonstrates the importance of herbicide selection, particularly for controlling johnsongrass plants larger than 30 cm. Additionally, the results demonstrate the benefits of a single application of glyphosate or clethodim at the boot stage of johnsongrass for decreasing the soil seedbank and reducing the success of johnsongrass progeny in future years.

En 2009 y 2012, se realizaron experimentos de campo en Fayetteville, AR, para comparar cuatro herbicidas y tres momentos de aplicación para el control de Sorghum halepense y para evaluar el efecto de aplicaciones tardías de herbicidas durante la temporada de crecimiento sobre el control, la fecundidad, la viabilidad de las semillas, y la emergencia de la progenie de S. halepense. En el primer experimento, glyphosate a 840 g ae ha−1 y clethodim a 68 y 136 g ai ha−1 brindaron 75 y 94% de control de S. halepense de 15 a 60 cm de altura, y hasta un 98% de reducción en el número de plantas establecidas a 4 semanas después del tratamiento (WAT). Glufosinate y nicosulfuron fueron generalmente efectivos en plantas de S. halepense de ≤30 cm de altura. Sin embargo, la eficacia disminuyó al aumentar la altura de S. halepense. En el segundo experimento, glyphosate a 840 g ha−1 brindó al menos 89% de control de S. halepense cuando se aplicó en el estado de engrosamiento por floración o después de la emergencia de la panícula y hasta 95% de reducción en el número de plantas establecidas a 3 WAT. Las aplicaciones de glyphosate a 420 y 840 g ha−1, clethodim a 68 y 136 g ha−1, y glufosinate a 740 g ai ha−1 en el estado de engrosamiento por floración redujeron la producción de semilla viable en 94 a 99%. Sin importar la dosis, glyphosate y clethodim aplicados en el estado de engrosamiento por floración redujeron la emergencia de la progenie en 77 a 95% y el peso de 100 semillas de las plantas tratadas en 62 a 96% al compararse con el testigo no-tratado. Esta investigación demuestra la importancia en la selección de herbicidas, particularmente para controlar plantas de S. halepense de más de 30 cm de altura. Adicionalmente, los resultados demuestran los beneficios de una aplicación sencilla de glyphosate o clethodim en el estadio de engrosamiento por floración para disminuir el banco de semillas y reducir el éxito de la progenie de S. halepense en los años siguientes.

Keywords

Clethodimglufosinateglyphosatenicosulfuronjohnsongrass, Sorghum halepense (L.) PersApplication timingherbicide selectionlate-season herbicidesprogeny vigorseedbank reductionweed size
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 142 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous (2013a) Select Max Herbicide Specimen Label. http://www.cdms.net/LDat/ld6SQ009.pdf. Accessed September 18, 2013Google Scholar
Anonymous (2013b) Accent Herbicide Specimen Label. http://www.cdms.net/LDat/ld738004.pdf. Accessed September 18, 2013Google Scholar
Askew, SD, Street, JE, Shaw, DR (1998) Herbicide programs for red rice (Oryza sativa) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 12:103–107 Google Scholar
Bagavathiannan, MV, Norsworthy, JK (2012) Late-season seed production in arable weed communities: Management implications. Weed Sci 60:325–334 Google Scholar
Bennett, AC, Shaw, DR (2000) Effect of preharvest dessicants on weed seed production and viability. Weed Technol 14:530–538 Google Scholar
Biniak, BM, Aldrich, RJ (1986) Reducing velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and giant foxtail (Setaria faberi) seed production with simulated-roller herbicide applications. Weed Sci 34:256–259 Google Scholar
Bovey, RW, Dahlberg, JA, Senseman, SA, Miller, FR, Torres, PM (1999) Desiccation and germination of grain sorghum as affected by glufosinate. Agron J 91:373–376 Google Scholar
Brewer, CE, Oliver, LR (2007) Reducing weed seed rain with late-season glyphosate applications. Weed Technol 21:753–758 Google Scholar
Burke, CI, Wilcut, JW, Crammer, J (2006) Cross-resistance of a johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) biotype to aryloxyphenoxypropionate and cyclohexanedione herbicides. Weed Technol 20:571–575 Google Scholar
Clay, PA, Griffin, JL (2000) Weed seed production and seedling emergence responses to late-season glyphosate applications. Weed Sci 48:481–486 Google Scholar
Corbett, JL, Askew, SD, Thomas, WE, Wilcut, JW (2004) Weed efficacy evaluations for bromoxynil, glufosinate, glyphosate, pyrothiobac, and sulfosate. Weed Technol 18:443–453 Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, York, AC (1999) Weed management in glufosinate-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 13:324–333 Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, York, AC, Jennings, KM, Batts, RB (2000) Weed management in glufosinate- and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 14:77–88 Google Scholar
Eleftherohorinos, IG, Kotoula-Syka, E (1995) Influence of herbicide application rate and timings for post-emergence control of Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. in maize. Weed Res 35:99–103 Google Scholar
Fawcett, RS, Slife, FW (1978) Effects of 2,4-D and dalapon on weed seed production and dormancy. Weed Sci 26:543–547 Google Scholar
Ferrell, JA, Murphy, TR, Vencill, WK, Guerke, WR (2003) Effects of postemergence herbicides on centipedegrass seed production. Weed Technol 17:871–875 Google Scholar
Ghersa, CM, Martinez-Ghersa, MA, Satorre, EH, Van Esso, ML, Chichotky, G (1993) Seed dispersal patterns of Sorghum halepense: the relationship with seed distribution and seedling recruitment. Weed Res 33:1–10 Google Scholar
Ghersa, CM, Satorre, EH, Van Esso, ML (1985) Seasonal patterns of johnsongrass seed production in different agricultural systems. Isr J Bot 34:24–31 Google Scholar
Holm, LG, Plunknett, DL, Pancho, JV, Herberger, JP (1991) The World's Worst Weeds, Distribution, and Biology. Malabar, FL: Kreger. Pp. 54–61 Google Scholar
Jha, P, Norsworthy, JK (2012) Influence of late-season herbicide applications on control, fecundity, and progeny fitness of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) biotypes from Arkansas. Weed Technol 26:807–812 Google Scholar
Johnson, WG, Frans, RE (1991) Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in soybeans (Glycine max) with postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol 5:87–91 Google Scholar
Mayfield, A, Presser, R (1998) Crop-topping in pulses with paraquat and glyphosate for control of annual ryegrass. Pages 20–21 in Stewart, V. (ed.) Agribusiness Crop Updates. Perth, Western Australia: Department of Agriculture Google Scholar
McWhorter, CG (1971) Introduction and spread of johnsongrass in the United States. Weed Sci 19:496–500 Google Scholar
McWhorter, CG (1989) History, biology, and control of johnsongrass. Rev. Weed Sci 4:85–121 Google Scholar
Moshier, LJ, Devlin, DL, Morishita, DW, Camacho, RF (1988) Johnsongrass control in corn with CGA-136872, DPX-V9360, and KIH-2665. Proc. North Cent. Weed Sci Soc 43–27Google Scholar
Norris, JL, Shaw, DR, Snipes, CE (2002) Influence of row spacing and residual herbicides on weed control in glufosinate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 16:319–325 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risk of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60 :31–62 Google Scholar
Parochetti, JV, Wilson, HP, Burt, GW (1975) Activity of glyphosate on johnsongrass. Weed Sci 23:395–400 Google Scholar
Pline, WA, Hatzios, K K, Hagood, ES (2000) Weed and herbicide-resistant soybean (Glycine max) response to glufosinate and glyphosate plus ammonium sulfate and pelargonic acid. Weed Technol 14:667–674 Google Scholar
Protsko, E.P., Meade, JA (1993) Reduced rates of postemergence herbicides in conventional soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol 7:365–369 Google Scholar
Rhodes, GN, Mueller, TC, Hayes, RM (1998) Performance of Roundup Ready corn weed control systems in Tennessee. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 51–20Google Scholar
Rosales-Robles, E, Chandler, JM, Senseman, SA, Prostko, EP (1999) Influence of growth stage and herbicide rate on postemergence johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control. Weed Technol 13:525–529 Google Scholar
Sawma, JT, Mohler, CL (2002) Evaluating seed viability by an unimbibed seed crush test in comparison with the tetrazolium test. Weed Technol 16:781–786 Google Scholar
Scopel, AL, Ballaré, CL, Ghersa, CM (1988) Role of seed reproduction in the population ecology of Sorghum halepense in maize crops. J App Eco. 25:951–962 Google Scholar
Shuma, JM, Quick, WA, Raju, MVS, Hsiao, AI (1995) Germination of seeds from plants of Avena fatua L. treated with glyphosate. Weed Res 35:249–255 Google Scholar
Steadman, KJ, Eaton, DM, Plummer, JA, Ferris, DG, Powles, SB (2006) Late-season non-selective herbicide application reduces Lolium rigidum seed numbers, seed viability, and seedling fitness. Aust J Agric Res 57:133–141 Google Scholar
Steckel, GJ, DeFelice, MS (1995) Reducing johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) interference in corn (Zea mays) with herbicides and cultivation. Weed Technol 9:53–57 Google Scholar
Steckel, GJ, Wax, LM., Simmons, FW, Phillips, WH II (1997) Glufosinate efficacy is influenced by rate and growth stage. Weed Technol 11:484–488 Google Scholar
Taylor, SE, Oliver, LR (1997) Sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia) seed production and viability as influenced by late-season postemergence herbicide applications. Weed Sci. 45:497–501.Google Scholar
Taylorson, RB, McWhorter, CG (1969) Seed dormancy and germination in ecotypes of johnsongrass. Weed Sci 17: 359–361 Google Scholar
Tingle, CH, Chandler, JM, Prostko, EP (1998) Herbicide combinations for residual control of in Roundup Ready corn. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 51:21–22 Google Scholar
Van Esso, ML, Ghersa, CM (1989) Dynamics of Sorghum halepense seeds in the soil of an uncultivated field. Can J Bot 67:940–944 Google Scholar
VanGessel, MJ, Ayeni, AO, Majek, BA (2000) Optimum glyphosate timing with or without residual herbicides in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max) under full-season conventional tillage. Weed Technol 14:140–149 Google Scholar
VanGessel, MJ, Ayeni, AO, Majek, BA (2001) Glyphosate in full season no-till glyphosate-resistant soybean: Role of preplant applications and residual herbicides. Weed Technol 15:714–724 Google Scholar
Viator, BJ, Griffin, JL, Clay, PA, Ellis, JM (1998) Johnsongrass control using Roundup Ready technology in fallowed sugercane fields. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 51:6–7 Google Scholar
Walsh, MJ, Powles, SB (2007) Management strategies for herbicide-resistant weed populations in Australian dryland crop production systems. Weed Technol 21:332–338 Google Scholar
Warwick, SI, Black, LD (1983) The biology of Canadian weeds. 61. Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. Can J Plant Sci 63: 997–1014 Google Scholar
Webster, TM, Coble, HD (1997) Changes in the weed species composition of the southern United States : 1974 to 1995. Weed Technol 11:308–317 Google Scholar
Webster, TM, Nichols, R (2012) Changes in the weed species in the major agronomic crops of the United States: 1994/1995 to 2008/2009. Weed Sci 60:145–157 Google Scholar
Welch, C, Ross, MA (1997) Effect of glyphosate, glufosinate, and 2,4-D on Canada thistle and hemp dogbane root systems. Proc North Cent Weed Sci Soc 52:33–35 Google Scholar