Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:02:58.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and Pitted Morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) Control with Imazaquin and Imazethapyr

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Dennis G. Riley
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
David R. Shaw
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762

Abstract

Imazaquin and imazethapyr were applied postemergence to soybeans for control of 8- to 12-leaf rhizome johnsongrass and pitted morningglory in the field. At 8 weeks, johnsongrass control was 70% with 70 g ai/ha imazaquin plus 105 g ai/ha imazethapyr but was no more than 50% with a single application of either herbicide. Imazaquin at 70 g/ha plus imazethapyr at 35 g/ha interacted synergistically to provide 90% pitted morningglory control, while 140 g/ha imazaquin controlled 77%. Imazaquin at 70 g/ha with imazethapyr from 18 to 105 g/ha controlled both weed species equal to or better than that obtained with 140 g/ha imazaquin.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barrett, M., and Olson, G. L. 1985. Critical rainfall periods for postemergence johnsongrass control. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:453.Google Scholar
2. Bloodworth, L. H., and Shaw, D. R. 1987. Morningglory control in a wheat-soybean double crop system. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:41.Google Scholar
3. Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:2022.Google Scholar
4. Dale, J. E. 1981. Control of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and volunteer corn (Zea mays) in soybeans. Weed Sci. 29:708711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Edmund, R. M. Jr., and York, A. C. 1987. Factors affecting postemergence control of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) with imazaquin and DPX-F6025: spray volume, growth stage, and soil-applied alachlor and vernolate. Weed Sci. 35:216233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. King, C. A., and Oliver, L. R. 1987. Reduced preemergence herbicide rates in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:29.Google Scholar
7. McClelland, M. R., Oliver, L. R., Mathis, W. D., and Frans, R. E. 1978. Responses of six morningglory (Ipomoea) species to bentazon. Weed Sci. 26:459464.Google Scholar
8. Muzyk, K. R., Dobson, J. B., O'Neil, J. B., Walls, F. R., Youmans, C. D., and Vanwinkle, D. 1987. Pursuit: 1986 soybean efficacy trials in the Atlantic Coast Region. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:45.Google Scholar
9. Risley, M. H., and Oliver, L. R. 1984. Influence of application methods of AC 252,214 on a spectrum of weed species. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 37:72.Google Scholar
10. Wang, T., Whatley, L. L., Congleton, W. F., Hackworth, H. M., Dunn, J. C., and Watkins, R. M. 1986. AC 263,499 herbicide: development status. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:520.Google Scholar
11. Watkins, R. M., Atkins, M. B., Congleton, W. F., Dunn, J. C., Goddard, G. F., Hackworth, H. M., Huffman, F. R., Matthews, R. S., McVay, G. B., Muzyk, K. R., and Wang, T. 1985. Field evaluation of AC 263,499 for weed control in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38:49.Google Scholar
12. Whitwell, T., Wehtje, G., Walker, R. H., and McGuire, J. A. 1985. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in soybeans (Glycine max) with postemergence grass herbicides applied alone and in mixtures. Weed Sci. 33:673678.Google Scholar
13. Wills, G. D., and McWhorter, C. G. 1987. Influence of inorganic salts and imazapyr on control of pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa) with imazaquin and imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 1:328331.Google Scholar