Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:28:31.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interference and Control of ALS-Resistant Mouse-Ear Cress (Arabidopsis thaliana) in Winter Wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 December 2018

Ranjeet S. Randhawa ,
James H. Westwood ,
Charles W. Cahoon  and
Michael L. Flessner Open the ORCID record for Michael L. Flessner [Opens in a new window]
Ranjeet S. Randhawa
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant; Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology and Weed Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
James H. Westwood
Affiliation:
Professor; Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology and Weed Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
Charles W. Cahoon
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor; Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology and Weed Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
Michael L. Flessner*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology and Weed Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
*
*Author for correspondence: Michael L. Flessner, Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology and Weed Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In 2015, winter wheat growers in Virginia reported commercial failures of thifensulfuron to control mouse-ear cress. This was the first reported case of field-evolved acetolactate synthase (ALS) resistance in mouse-ear cress, so research was conducted to evaluate alternative herbicide options as well as to document potential yield loss in winter wheat from mouse-ear cress. Efficacy studies were conducted at three site-years in 2015 to 2016 and 2016 to 2017 as well as a POST greenhouse trial. In the PRE study, flumioxazin, pyroxasulfone, saflufenacil, and metribuzin resulted in more than 80% mouse-ear cress control 15 wk after planting across all sites with no observable wheat injury. No differences were observed in wheat yield in two of three sites in the PRE herbicide study; yield differences were attributed to common chickweed and not to mouse-ear cress. In the POST herbicide study, 2,4-D, dicamba, and metribuzin resulted in greater than 75% control in the field and greenhouse. Metribuzin, dicamba, and pyroxsulam resulted in crop injury 3 wk after treatment at some sites, but injury was transient. Yield from all POST treatments was similar to the nontreated plots. No yield loss was observed by mouse-ear cress densities greater than 300 plants m–2, indicating that mouse-ear cress is not very competitive with winter wheat. Growers should make herbicide decisions based on other weeds in the field and can incorporate the aforementioned herbicides for mouse-ear cress control.

Keywords

Mark VanGessel, University of DelawareDicambaflumioxazinmetribuzinpyroxasulfonepyroxsulamsaflufenacilthifensulfuron2,4-Dcommon chickweedStellaria media L.mouse-ear cressArabidopsis thaliana L.wheatTriticum aestivum L.CompetitiondensityPOST controlPRE controlyield loss
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 32 , Issue 6 , December 2018 , pp. 671 - 677
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2018. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alex, JF (1970) Competition of Saponaria vaccaria and Sinapis arevensis in wheat. Can J Plant Sci 50:379–388 Google Scholar
Anonymous (2010) Harmony® Extra SG herbicide product label. DuPont Publication No. SL – 1415 061510. Wilmington, DE: DuPont. 13 pGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (2012) Harmony® SG herbicide product label. DuPont Publication No. SL – 1733 041812. Wilmington, DE: DuPont. 15 pGoogle Scholar
Blackman, GE, Templeman, WG (1938) The nature of the competition between cereal crops and annual weeds. J Agr Sci 28:247–271 Google Scholar
Burrows, VD, Olson, PJ (1955) Reactions of small grain to various densities of wild mustard and the results obtained after their removal with 2,4-D or by hand. Can J Agr Sci 35:68–75 Google Scholar
Cahoon, CW (2016) Wild mustard and wild radish. http://blogs.ext.vt.edu/ag-pest-advisory/files/2016/11/Problem-Weed-Mustard-and-Radish.pdf. Accessed: Feburary 12, 2018 Google Scholar
Carter, AS, Lefforge, JH, Shenberger, LC (1946) A study of the effect of infestations of field peppergrass on the yield of wheat. Proc Assoc Offic Seed Anal 36:103 Google Scholar
Conley, SP, Bradley, KW (2005) Wheat (Triticum aestivum) yield response to henbit (Lamium amplexicaule) interference and simulated winterkill. Weed Technol 19:902–906 Google Scholar
Dinneny, JR, Yanofsky, MF (2005) Drawing lines and borders: how the dehiscent fruit of Arabidopsis is patterned. Bioessays 27:42–49 Google Scholar
Farahbakhsh, A, Murphy, KJ, Madden, AD (1987) The effect of weed interference on the growth and yield of wheat. Proc Br Crop Prof Conf 3:955–961 Google Scholar
Faria, RM, Barros, RE, Santos, LDT (2014) Weed interference on growth and yield of transgenic maize. Planta Daninha 32:515–520 Google Scholar
Frans, RE, Talbert, R, Marx, D, Crowley, H (1986) Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices. Pages 29–46 in Camper ND, ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Sci SocGoogle Scholar
Friesen, G, Shebeski, LH (1960) Economic losses caused by weed competition in manitoba grainfields. I. Weed species, their relative abundance and their effect on crop yields. Can J Plant Sci 40:457–467 Google Scholar
Geier, PW, Stahlman, PW, Charvat, LD (2009) Dose responses of five broadleaf weeds to saflufenacil. Weed Technol 23:313–316 Google Scholar
Hashem, A, Wilkins, N (2002) Competitiveness and persistence of wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum L.) in a wheat–lupin rotation. Pages 712–715 in Proceedings of the 13th Australian Weeds Conference. Perth, Western Australia: Plant Protection Society of WA Inc.Google Scholar
Hays, JB (2002) Arabidopsis thaliana, a versatile model system for study of eukaryotic genome-maintenance functions. DNA Repair 1:579–600 Google Scholar
Heap, I (2017) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds: http://weedscience.org/summary/herbicide.aspx. Accessed: June 4, 2017Google Scholar
Meinke, DW, Cherry, JM, Dean, C, Rounsley, SD, Koornneef, M (1998) Arabidopsis thaliana: a model plant for genome analysis. Science 282:662–682 Google Scholar
Meyerowitz, EM (1989) Arabidopsis, a useful weed. Cell 56:263–269 Google Scholar
Mitchell-Olds, T (2001) Arabidopsis thaliana and its wild relatives: a model system for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 16:693–700 Google Scholar
Nakoneshny, G, Friesen, W (1961) The influence of a commercial fertilizer treatment on weed competition in spring sown wheat. Can J Plant Sci 41:231–238 Google Scholar
Northam, FE, Stahlman, PW, Abd El-Hamid, M (1993) Broadleaf weed control in winter wheat. West Soc Weed Sci Res Prog Rep III:173–175Google Scholar
Orr, J, Canevari, M, Jackson, L, Wennig, R, Carner, R, Nishimoto, G (1996) Postemergence herbicides and application time affect wheat yields. California Agriculture 50:32–36 Google Scholar
Randhawa, RS, Flessner, ML, Cahoon, CW, Westwood, JH (2017) Thifensulfuron resistance quantification in mouse-ear cress (Arabidopsis thaliana) and cross resistance to other ALS inhibiting chemistries. Page 70 in Proceedings of South Weed Sci Soc 70Google Scholar
Refsell, DE (2013) Integrated weed management in Kansas winter wheat. Ph.D dissertation. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University. 101 pGoogle Scholar
Robinson, MA, Letarte, J, Cowbrough, MJ, Sikkema, PH, Tardif, FJ (2015) Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) response to herbicides as affected by application timing and temperature. Can J Plant Sci 95:325–333 Google Scholar
Rydrych, D (1981) Corn cockle (Agrostemma githago) competition in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci 29:360–363 Google Scholar
Scott, R, Peeper, T, Koscelny, JA (1995) Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) yield response to winter annual broadleaf weed control. Weed Technol. 9:954–1598 Google Scholar
Stewart, CN Jr (2009) Weedy and Invasive Plant Genomics. 1st edn. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons Google Scholar
Swan, DG (1971) Competition of blue mustard with winter wheat.Weed Sci 19:340–342 Google Scholar
Swan, DG, Furtick, WR (1962) Competition of fiddleneck with wheat. Weeds 10:121–123 Google Scholar
Vrabel, TE (1987) Effect of fall weed control on the yield of winter wheat. Pages 55–58 in Proceedings of Northeastern Weed Sci Soc. 41, https://www.newss.org/proceedings/proceedings_1987_vol41.pdf. Accessed: October 19, 2018Google Scholar