Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:11:43.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interaction of Metribuzin and Phorate on ‘Atlantic’ and ‘Norchip’ Potato (Solanum tuberosum) Cultivars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Harlene Hatterman-Valenti ,
Vince F. Lawson  and
Micheal D. K. Owen
Harlene Hatterman-Valenti
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Hortic. Dep. and Dep. Agron., Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011
Vince F. Lawson
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Hortic. Dep. and Dep. Agron., Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011
Micheal D. K. Owen
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Hortic. Dep. and Dep. Agron., Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effects of metribuzin herbicide and phorate insecticide were studied on summer harvest chipping-potatoes at Muscatine, IA, from 1989 to 1991. Phorate at 1.5 kg/ha increased total and ‘A’-size tuber yield and tuber specific gravity. Metribuzin applied at 0.56 kg/ha postemergence decreased total and ‘A’-size tuber yield. Metribuzin applied at 0.56 kg/ha preemergence and 0.28 kg/ha postemergence did not reduce Atlantic cultivar yield. Metribuzin did not affect ‘B’-size tuber yield or specific gravity. Phorate in combination with metribuzin did not increase plant injury or reduce tuber yield.

Keywords

Metribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-onephorate, O,O-diethyl-S-[(ethylthio)methyl]phosphorodithioatepotato, Solanum tuberosum L.Specific gravitytuber sizeyield
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , September 1994 , pp. 461 - 464
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Cranshaw, W. S. and Thornton, M. K. 1988. Effects of systemic insecticides on potato growth and their interaction with metribuzin. Am. Potato J. 65:535–541.Google Scholar
2. DeBuchananne, D. A. and Lawson, V. F. 1991. Effect of plant population and harvest timing on yield and chipping quality of Atlantic and Norchip potatoes at two Iowa locations. Am. Potato J. 68:287–297.Google Scholar
3. Friesen, G. H. and Wall, D. A. 1984. Response of potato (Solanum tuberosum) cultivars to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 32:442–444.Google Scholar
4. Graf, G. T. and Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1976. Differential response of potato cultivars to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 24:137–139.Google Scholar
5. Hayes, R. M., Yeargan, K. V., Witt, W. W., and Raney, H. G. 1979. Interaction of selected insecticide-herbicide combinations on soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 27:51–54.Google Scholar
6. Hoyman, W. G. 1969. Injury of potato foliage by systemic insecticides. Am. Potato J. 46:182–183.Google Scholar
7. Love, S. L. and Haderlie, L. C. 1989. Relationship of foliar injury, plant height and vine maturity to yield of potato clones following metribuzin applications. Am. Potato J. 66:83–92.Google Scholar
8. Renner, K. A. 1992. Timing of herbicide application and potato hilling. Am. Potato J. 69:167–177.Google Scholar
9. Waldrop, D. D. and Banks, P. A. 1983. Interactions of herbicides with insecticides in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 31:730–734.Google Scholar
10. Wressell, H. B. and Driscoll, G. R. 1964. The use of systemic insecticides for control of the potato leafhopper, Empoasca fabae, and effect on potato yield. J. Econ. Entomol. 57:992–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Zimdahl, R. L. 1976. Differential susceptibility of potato cultivars to four herbicides. Am. Potato J. 53:211–219.Google Scholar