Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:49:31.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integration of Conservation Tillage and Herbicides for Sustainable Dry Bean Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Robert E. Blackshaw  and
Louis J. Molnar
Robert E. Blackshaw*
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Centre, 5403–1st Avenue South, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4B1
Louis J. Molnar
Affiliation:
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge Research Centre, 5403–1st Avenue South, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4B1
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Development of conservation tillage practices for dry bean has lagged behind that of many other crops. A field study was conducted to determine the effects of various crop residues and herbicide treatments on weed management and dry bean yield within a zero-tillage system. Main plot treatments included wheat stubble, canola stubble, fall-seeded winter rye, fall-seeded spring rye, and a no-cover control. Subplot treatments included various preplant and POST herbicides. Wheat stubble, canola stubble, and winter rye residue provided sufficient ground cover to prevent soil erosion, and they effectively reduced weed density compared with the no-cover control in all years. Fall-seeded spring rye provided only partial soil-erosion protection and reduced weed density in only 1 of 3 yr. Dry bean emergence was 3 to 5 d slower in the crop residue treatments compared with the no-cover control, but crop density was not adversely affected. However, winter rye residue delayed dry bean maturity by 2 to 6 d. Fall-applied granular ethalfluralin followed by POST bentazon/imazethapyr or imazamox provided the most effective weed control. A sole POST imazamox application also provided good weed control when weed densities were reduced by winter rye residue or wheat stubble. Overall, results indicate that with suitable herbicide programs, similar yields were attained when dry bean was seeded directly into crop stubble or cover crop residues compared with the no-cover control. Information gained in this study will be used to encourage greater farmer adoption of conservation tillage practices for dry bean production on the Canadian prairies.

Keywords

Bentazonethalfluralinimazamoximazethapyrcanola, Brassica napus L.dry bean, Phaseolus vulgaris L.rye, Secale cereale L.wheat, Triticum aestivum L.Cover cropsdry bean yieldintegrated weed managementsustainable agriculturezero tillage
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 168 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada 1990. Canadian Ecodistrict Climate Normals 1961–1990. http://sas.agr.gc.ca/cansis/nsdb/ecostrat/district/climate.html. Accessed: June 18, 2007.Google Scholar
Anonymous, , 1991. National Survey of Conservation Tillage Practices Including Other Tillage Types. West Lafayette, IN Conservation Technology Information Center (CTIC).Google Scholar
Balasubramanian, P., Vandenberg, A., and Hucl, P. 2004. Planting date and suboptimal seedbed temperature effects on dry bean establishment, phenology and yield. Can. J. Plant Sci. 84:31–36.Google Scholar
Bauer, T. A., Renner, K. A., and Penner, D. 1995. Response of selected weed species to postemergence imazethapyr and bentazon. Weed Technol. 9:236–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bisal, F. and Ferguson, W. S. 1970. Effect of nonerodible aggregates and wheat stubble on initiation of soil drifting. Can. J. Soil Sci. 50:31–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E. 1991. Hairy nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides) interference in dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Sci. 39:48–53.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E. 1998. Postemergence weed control in pea (Pisum sativum) with imazamox. Weed Technol. 12:64–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E., Molnar, L. J., Clayton, G. W., Harker, K. N., and Entz, T. 2007. Dry bean production in zero and conventional tillage. Agron. J. 99:122–126.Google Scholar
Blackshaw, R. E., Molnar, L. J., Mündel, H. H., Saindon, G., and Li, X. 2000. Integration of cropping practices and herbicides improves weed management in dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Technol. 14:327–336.Google Scholar
Brook, H., editor. 2007. Crop Protection 2007. Edmonton, Canada Alberta Agriculture and Food Agdex 606-1. 523.Google Scholar
Burnside, O. C., Krause, N. H., Wiens, M. J., Johnson, M. M., and Ristau, E. A. 1993. Alternative weed management systems for the production of kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Technol. 7:940–945.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L. 1995. Influence of adjuvants on the antagonism of graminicides by broadleaf herbicides. Weed Technol. 9:741–747.Google Scholar
Knavel, D. E. and Herron, J. W. 1986. Response of vegetable crops to nitrogen rates in tillage systems with and without vetch and ryegrass. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 111:502–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebman, M., Corson, S., Rowe, R. J., and Halteman, W. A. 1995. Dry bean responses to nitrogen fertilizer in two tillage and residue management systems. Agron. J. 87:538–546.Google Scholar
Mesbath, A. O., Miller, S. D., and Koetz, P. J. 2004. Common sunflower (Helianthus annus) and green foxtail (Setaria viridis) interference in dry bean. Weed Technol. 18:902–907.Google Scholar
Moyer, J. R., Blackshaw, R. E., Smith, E. G., and McGinn, S. M. 2000. Cereal cover crops for weed suppression in a summer fallow-wheat cropping sequence. Can. J. Plant Sci. 80:441–449.Google Scholar
Moyer, J. R. and Esau, R. 1996. Imidazolinone herbicide effects on following rotational crops in southern Alberta. Weed Technol. 10:100–106.Google Scholar
Moyer, J. R. and Huang, H. C. 1997. Effect of aqueous extracts of crop residues on germination and seedling growth of ten weed species. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. 38:131–139.Google Scholar
Nieya, T., Ball, R. A., and Vanderberg, A. 2005. Germination of common bean under constant and alternating cool temperatures. Can. J. Plant Sci. 85:577–585.Google Scholar
Rhodes, N. G. Jr and Coble, H. D. 1984. Influence of application variables on antagonism between sethoxydim and bentazon. Weed Sci. 32:436–441.Google Scholar
Saindon, G., Huang, H. C., and Kozub, G. C. 1995. White-mold avoidance and agronomic attributes of upright common beans grown at multiple planning densities in narrow rows. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 120:843–847.Google Scholar
Sarrantonio, M. and Gallandt, E. R. 2003. The role of cover crops in North American cropping systems. J. Crop Prod. 8:53–73.Google Scholar
SAS 2005. SAS OnlineDoc® 9.1.3. Cary, NC SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Shirtliffe, S. J. and Johnston, A. M. 2002. Yield–density relationships and optimum plant populations in two cultivars of solid-seeded dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) grown in Saskatchewan. Can. J. Plant Sci. 82:521–529.Google Scholar
Shrestha, A., Knezevic, S. Z., Roy, R. C., Ball-Coelho, B. R., and Swanton, C. J. 2002. Effect of tillage, cover crop and crop rotation on the composition of weed flora in a sandy soil. Weed Res. 42:76–87.Google Scholar
Sikkema, P. H., Robinson, D. E., Shropshire, C., and Soltani, N. 2006. Responses of otebo bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to postemergence herbicides. Weed Biol. Manag. 6:68–73.Google Scholar
Skarphol, B. J., Corey, K. A., and Meisinger, J. J. 1987. Response of snap beans to tillage cover crop combinations. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 112:936–941.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada, , 2002. Table 7: Tillage Practices Used to Prepare Land for Seeding, by Province, Census Agricultural Region (CAR) and Census Division (CD), 2001. in. 2001 Census of Agriculture, Farm Data: Initial Release, Data Tables. http://www.statcan.ca/english/freepub/95F0301XIE/tables/html/Table7Can.htm#46. Accessed: May 9, 2007.Google Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. 2nd ed. New York McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Teasdale, J. R. 1993. Interaction of light, soil moisture, and temperature with weed suppression by hairy vetch residue. Weed Sci. 41:46–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teasdale, J. R. 1996. Contribution of cover crops to weed management in sustainable agricultural systems. J. Prod. Agric. 9:475–479.Google Scholar
Wall, D. A. 1993. Wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis) competition with navy beans. Can. J. Plant Sci. 73:1309–1313.Google Scholar
Wall, D. A. 1995. Bentazon tank-mixtures for improved redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) and common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) control in navy bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Weed Technol. 9:610–616.Google Scholar
Wanamarta, G., Penner, D., and Kells, J. J. 1989. The basis of bentazon antagonism on sethoxydim absorption and activity. Weed Sci. 37:400–404.Google Scholar
Weston, L. A. 1996. Utilization of allelopathy for weed management in agroecosystems. Agron. J. 88:860–866.Google Scholar