Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T00:53:03.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integrated Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Management in Field Corn (Zea mays) with Reduced Rates of Nicosulfuron and Cultivation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Enrique Rosales-Robles ,
James M. Chandler ,
Scott A. Senseman  and
Eric P. Prostko
Enrique Rosales-Robles
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77840
James M. Chandler*
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77840
Scott A. Senseman
Affiliation:
Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A & M University, College Station, TX 77840
Eric P. Prostko
Affiliation:
Texas A & M University Research and Extension Center, Stephenville, TX 76401
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Johnsongrass, a tall, coarse, perennial grass, is the second most common and troublesome weed in field corn in Texas. Field experiments were conducted in 1996 to 1998 to evaluate an integrated johnsongrass management program in bedded and irrigated field corn. Nicosulfuron at 26.3 g ai/ha applied banded over the row to 50% of the planted area plus one cultivation resulted in johnsongrass control of aboveground and rhizome biomass and in corn yield comparable to the labeled rate (35 g ai/ha) when applied two consecutive years in the same plots. This treatment reduced cost 27% and reduced herbicide input 62% compared to nicosulfuron applied broadcast at labeled rate without cultivation. Economic benefits of this johnsongrass management program are promising for field corn producers.

Keywords

Nicosulfuron, 2-[[[[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-N-N-dimethyl-3-pyridinecarboxamidejohnsongrass, Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. #SORHAcorn, Zea mays L. ‘Mycogen 9220,’ ‘Ciba 4575.’Integrated weed managementSORHABAND, banded applicationBCAST, broadcast applicationCULT, cultivationIWM, integrated weed managementPOST, postemergencePRE preemergenceWAT, weeks after treatment
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 1999 , pp. 367 - 373
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, L. E., Appleby, A. P., and Weseloh, J. W. 1960. Characteristics of johnsongrass rhizomes. Weeds 8:402–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, W. P. 1996. Weed Science: Principles and Applications. 3rd ed. Minneapolis, MN: West Publishing. 388 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1998. Crop Protection Reference. 14th ed. New York: C&P Press. 2170 p.Google Scholar
Bicki, T. J., Wax, L. M., and Sipp, S. K. 1991. Evaluation of reduced herbicide application strategies for weed control in coarse-textured soils. J. Prod. Agric. 4:516–519.Google Scholar
Buhler, D. D., Gunsolus, J. L., and Ralston, D. F. 1992. Integrated weed management techniques to reduce herbicide inputs in soybean. Agron. J. 84:973–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, D. D., Gunsolus, J. L., and Ralston, D. F. 1993. Common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) control in soybean (Glycine max) with reduced bentazon rates and cultivation. Weed Sci. 41:447–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Camacho, R. F., Moshier, L. J., Morishita, D. W., and Devlin, D. L. 1991. Rhizome johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in corn (Zea mays) with primisulfuron and nicosulfuron. Weed Technol. 5:789–794.Google Scholar
Eleftherohorinos, I. G. and Kotoula-Syka, E. 1995. Influence of herbicide application rate and timings for post-emergence control of Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers. in maize. Weed Res. 35:99–103.Google Scholar
Foy, C. L. and Witt, H. L. 1990. Johnsongrass control with DPX-V9360 and CGA-136872 in corn (Zea mays) in Virginia. Weed Technol. 4:615–619.Google Scholar
Ghosheh, H. Z., Holshouser, D. L., and Chandler, J. M. 1996a. Influence of density on johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) interference in field corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 44:879–883.Google Scholar
Ghosheh, H. Z., Holshouser, D. L., and Chandler, J. M. 1996b. The critical period of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in field corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 44:944–947.Google Scholar
Hartzler, R. G. and Hanna, M. H. 1990. Banding Herbicides for Row Crop Weed Management. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Extension Bull. Pm-1393. 4 p.Google Scholar
Hartzler, R. G., Van Kooten, B. D., Stoltenberg, D. E., Hall, E. M., and Fawcett, R. S. 1993. On-farm evaluation of mechanical and chemical weed management practices in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 7:1001–1004.Google Scholar
Horowitz, M. 1972. Early development of johnsongrass. Weed Sci. 20:271–273.Google Scholar
Lentner, M. and Bishop, T. 1993. Experimental Design and Analysis. 2nd ed. Blacksburg, VA: Valley Book Company. 585 p.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. 1961. Morphology and development of johnsongrass plants from seeds and rhizomes. Weeds 9:558–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, T. A. and Doll, J. D. 1993. Integrating reduced herbicide use with mechanical weeding in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 7:382–389.Google Scholar
Obrigawitch, T. T., Kenyon, W. H., and Kuratle, H. 1990. Effect of application timing on rhizome johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control with DPX-V9360. Weed Sci. 38:45–49.Google Scholar
Parks, R. J., Curran, W. S., Roth, G. W., Hartwig, N. L., and Calvin, D. D. 1995. Common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) control in corn (Zea mays) with postemergence herbicides and cultivation. Weed Technol. 9:728–735.Google Scholar
Pleasant, J. M., Burt, R. F., and Frisch, J. C. 1994. Integrating mechanical and chemical weed management in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 8:217–223.Google Scholar
Rosales-Robles, E. 1998. Integrated Johnsongrass [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.] Management in Field Corn (Zea mays) and Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). . Texas A&M University, College Station, TX. 124 p.Google Scholar
Rowehl, J. E. and Curran, W. S. 1993. Johnsongrass [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.] control in corn. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 47:34.Google Scholar
Steckel, G. J. and DeFelice, M. S. 1995. Reducing johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) interference in corn (Zea mays) with herbicides and cultivation. Weed Technol. 9:53–57.Google Scholar
Stokes, K. W. 1997. Texas Crop Enterprise Budgets: Central Texas District. College Station, TX: The Texas A&M University System, Texas Agricultural Extension Service Pub. B-1241 (C08). 35 p.Google Scholar
Swanton, C. J. and Weise, S. F. 1991. Integrated weed management: the rationale and approach. Weed Technol. 5:657–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tweedy, M. J. and Kapusta, G. 1995. Nicosulfuron and primisulfuron eradicate rhizome johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in corn (Zea mays) in three years. Weed Technol. 9:748–753.Google Scholar