Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T16:45:21.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Injury and Yield Response of Selected Crops to Imazaquin and Norflurazon Residues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Clyde J. Barnes  and
Terry L. Lavy
Clyde J. Barnes
Affiliation:
Univ. Ark., Fayetteville, 72701
Terry L. Lavy
Affiliation:
Univ. Ark., Fayetteville, 72701
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in 1987, 1988, and 1989 to evaluate the effects of freshly applied residual levels (simulated residue carryover) of imazaquin and norflurazon on the growth and yield of corn, cotton, grain sorghum, rice, and wheat. Studies ware conducted on five soils, and concentrations of herbicides were determined at crop planting. Crop injury ratings were recorded 4 wk after emergence, and yields were measured at the end of each growing season. In simulated residue carryover studies, corn and grain sorghum injury occurred and yields were reduced when norflurazon concentrations were 450 ng g-1 soil or greater. Rice yields were reduced at norflurazon concentrations of 710 ng g-1. Corn, cotton, and wheat heights and yields were reduced when imazaquin concentrations were 13 ng g-1, 13 ng g-1, and 45 ng g-1 soil, respectively for crops. Comparisons between simulated carryover and actual carryover were made for corn and cotton grown in imazaquin treated fields as well as for corn grown in a norflurazon treated field.

Keywords

Imazaquin, 2-[4,5-dihydro-4-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-5-oxo-1H-imidazol-2-yl]-3-quinolinecarboxylic acidnorflurazon, 4-chloro-5-(methyl-amino)-2-(3-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-3(2H)-pyridazinonecorn, Zea mays L. ‘McCurdy 8172’, cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Stoneville 506’, grain sorghum, Sorghum bicolor L. ‘Topaz’, rice, Oryza sativa L. ‘Newbonnet’, wheat, Triticum aestivum L. ‘Caldwell’Herbicide carryoverGossypium hirsutumOryza sativaSorghum bicolorTriticum aestivumZea mays
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , September 1991 , pp. 598 - 606
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1989. Farm Chemical's Handbook. Meister Publishing Company, Ohio.Google Scholar
2. Barnes, C. J., Goetz, A. J., and Lavy, T. L. 1989. Effects of imazaquin residues on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 37:820–824.Google Scholar
3. Bartels, P. G., and Watson, C. W. 1978. Inhibition of carotenoid synthesis by fluridone and norflurazon. Weed Sci. 26:198–203.Google Scholar
4. Basham, G. W., Leavy, T. L., Oliver, L. R., and Scott, H. D. 1987. Imazaquin persistence and mobility in three Arkansas soils. Weed Sci. 35:576–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Burns, R. G. 1975. Factors affecting pesticide loss from soil. p. 103–141 in Paul, E. A., and McLoren, A. D., eds. Soil Biochemistry Vol 4. Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
6. Hance, R. J. 1988. Adsorption and bioavailability. p. 2–20 in Grover, R., ed. Environmental Chemistry of Herbicides. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
7. Keeling, J. W., Lloyd, R. W., and Abernathy, J. R. 1989. Rotational crop response to repeated applications of norflurazon. Weed Technol. 3:122–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Kennedy, M. R. 1975. Activity and persistence of norflurazon as affected by soil factors. M.S. Thesis, Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville. 57 p.Google Scholar
9. Lo, Chi-Chu, and Merkle, M. G. 1984. Factors affecting the phytotoxicity of norflurazon. Weed Sci. 32:279–283.Google Scholar
10. Loux, M. M., Liebl, R. A., and Slife, F. W. 1989. Adsorption of imazaquin and imazethapyr on soils, sediments, and selected adsorbents. Weed Sci. 37:712–718.Google Scholar
11. Mills, J. A., and Witt, W. W. 1989. Efficacy, phytotoxicity, and persistence of imazaquin, imazethapyr, and clomazone in no-till double-crop soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 37:353–359.Google Scholar
12. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Leavitt, R. A. 1988. Influence of rate, method of application, and tillage on imazaquin persistence in soil Weed Sci. 36:90–95.Google Scholar
13. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1988. Effect of soil pH on imazaquin and imazethapyr adsorption to soil and phytotoxicity to corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 36:78–83.Google Scholar
14. Renner, K. A., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1988. Response of corn (Zea mays) cultivars to imazaquin. Weed Sci. 36:625–628.Google Scholar
15. Schroeder, J., and Banks, P. A. 1986. Persistence of norflurazon in five Georgia soils. Weed Sci. 34:595–599.Google Scholar
16. Schroeder, J., and Banks, P. A. 1986. Persistence and activity of norflurazon and fluridone in five Georgia soils under controlled conditions. Weed Sci. 34:599–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Shaner, D. L., Anderson, P. C., and Stidham, M. A. 1984. Imidazolinones: potent inhibitors of acetohydroxyacid synthase. Plant Physiol. 76:545–546.Google Scholar
18. Strang, R. H., and Rogers, R. L. 1975. Translocation of 14C-SAN 6706 in cotton, soybean, and corn. Weed Sci. 23:26–31.Google Scholar
19. Weber, J. B., Shea, P. H., and Weed, S. B. 1986. Fluridone retention and release in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50:582–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Weber, J. B., Perry, P. W., and Upchurch, R. P. 1965. The influence of temperature and time on the adsorption of paraquat, diquat, 2,4-D, and prometone by clays, charcoal, and an anion-exchange resin. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 29:678–688.Google Scholar
21. Vaisberg, A. J., and Schiff, J. A. 1976. Events surrounding the early development of Euglena chloroplasts. Plant Physiol. 57:260–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed