Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T12:35:02.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Deep Tillage and a Rye Cover Crop on Glyphosate-Resistant Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Emergence in Cotton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Justin D. DeVore ,
Jason K. Norsworthy  and
Kristofor R. Brye
Justin D. DeVore
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, 1366 West Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
Jason K. Norsworthy*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, 1366 West Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
Kristofor R. Brye
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Plant Sciences 115, Fayetteville, AR 72701
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth has become a major problem for cotton producers throughout much of the southern United States. With cotton producers relying heavily on glyphosate-resistant cotton, an alternative solution to controlling resistant Palmer amaranth is needed. A field experiment was conducted during 2009 and 2010 at Marianna, AR, in which a rye cover crop and no cover crop were tested in combination with deep tillage with the use of a moldboard plow and no tillage to determine the impact on Palmer amaranth emergence in cotton. To establish a baseline population, 500,000 glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth seeds were placed in a 2-m2 area in the middle of each plot and incorporated into the soil, and emergence was evaluated five times during the season. In 2009, both tillage and the cover crop reduced Palmer amaranth emergence in cotton, but the combination of the two reduced emergence 85%. In the second year, only the cover crop reduced Palmer amaranth emergence in cotton, a 68% reduction. Cover crops and deep tillage will not eliminate glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth; however, use of these tools will likely reduce the risks of failures associated with residual herbicides along with selection pressure placed on both PRE- and POST-applied herbicides. Additional efforts should focus on the integration of the best cultural practices identified in this research with use of residual herbicides and greater focus on limiting Palmer amaranth seed production and reducing the soil seedbank.

El Amaranthus palmeri resistente a glyphosate se ha convertido en un gran problema para los productores de algodón a lo largo del sur de los Estados Unidos. Al depender los productores de algodón, fuertemente de algodón resistente a glyphosate, se necesita una solución alternativa para controlar A. palmeri resistente. Se realizó un experimento de campo durante 2009 y 2010 en Marianna, AR, en el cual se evaluó el centeno como cultivo de cobertura y la ausencia de cultivo de cobertura en combinación con labranza profunda con el uso de arado de vertedera y cero labranza, para determinar el impacto en la emergencia de A. palmeri en el algodón. Para establecer una población base se pusieron 500 000 semillas de A. palmeri resistente a glyphosate en un área de 2 m−2 en el centro de cada parcela y se incorporaron al suelo, y la emergencia fue evaluada cinco veces durante la temporada de crecimiento. En 2009, ambos sistemas de labranza y el cultivo de cobertura redujeron la emergencia de A. palmeri en algodón, pero la combinación de ambos redujo la emergencia en 85%. En el segundo año, solamente el cultivo de cobertura redujo la emergencia de A. palmeri en el algodón, con una reducción de 68%. Los cultivos de cobertura y la labranza profunda no eliminarán A. palmeri resistente a glyphosate. Sin embargo, el uso de estas herramientas probablemente reducirá el riesgo asociado a fallas en el control con herbicidas residuales, además de la presión de selección asociada a herbicidas PRE y POST. Esfuerzos adicionales deberían enfocarse en la integración de las mejores prácticas culturales identificadas en esta investigación con el uso de herbicidas residuales y un mayor énfasis en limitar la producción de semilla de A. palmeri y así reducir el banco de semillas.

Keywords

GlyphosatePalmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Watscotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Stoneville 4554 B2RF'rye, Secale cereale L. ‘Wrens Abruzzi'Cover cropcultural weed controlmechanical weed controlmoldboard plowpigweedweed suppression
Type
Notes
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 832 - 838
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 2012a. Mississippi State Budget Generator. http://www.agecon.msstate.edu/what/farm/generator/. Accessed: January 30, 2012.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2012b. Web Soil Survey. http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx. Accessed: March 13, 2012.Google Scholar
Bauer, P. J. and Busscher, W. J. 1996. Winter cover and tillage influences on coastal plain cotton production. J. Prod. Agric. 9 :50–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckie, H. J. 2006. Herbicide-resistant weeds: management tactics and practices. Weed Technol. 20 :793–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, G. A. and Burns, E. R. 1970. Influence of weed competition on cotton. Weed Sci. 18 :149–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, G. A., Crowley, R. H., Street, J. E., and McGuire, J. A. 1980. Competition of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) and redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 28 :258–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A. J., Decker, A. M., and Meisinger, J. J. 1994. Seeding rate and kill date effects on hairy vetch–cereal rye cover crop mixtures for corn production. Agron. J. 86 :1065–1070.Google Scholar
Creamer, N. G., Bennett, M. A., Stinner, B. R., Cardina, J., and Regnier, E. E. 1996. Mechanisms of weed suppression in cover crop–based production systems. HortScience 31 :410–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowley, R. H. and Buchanan, G. A. 1978. Competition of four morningglory (Ipomoea spp.) species with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 26 :484–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dill, G. M., CaJocob, C. A., and Padgette, S. R. 2008. Glyphosate-resistant crops: adoption, use and future considerations. Pest Manag. Sci. 64 :326–331.Google Scholar
Galloway, B. A. and Weston, L. A. 1996. Influence of cover crop and herbicide treatment on weed control and yield in no-till sweet corn (Zea mays L.) and pumpkin (Curcubita maxima Duch.). Weed Technol. 10 :341–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garvey, P. V. 1999. Goosegrass (Eleusine indica) and Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Interference in Plasticulture Tomato. Ph.D Dissertation. Raleigh, NC : North Carolina State University. 101 p.Google Scholar
Griffith, G. M., Norsworthy, J. K., and Griffin, T. 2009. Spatial movement of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth in Roundup Ready Flex cotton. Summaries of Arkansas Cotton Research, AAES Research Series 582 :89–93.Google Scholar
Heap, I. 2011. The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed: March 8, 2011.Google Scholar
Jha, P. and Norsworthy, J. K. 2012. Seedbank persistence of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in South Carolina over a four-year period. Weed Res. In review.Google Scholar
Jha, P., Norsworthy, J. K., Malik, M. S., Bangarwa, S. K., and Oliveira, M. J. 2006. Temporal emergence of Palmer amaranth from a natural seedbank. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 59 :177.Google Scholar
Keeley, P. E., Carter, C. H., and Thullen, R. M. 1987. Influence of planting date on growth of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). Weed Sci. 35 :199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leon, R. G. and Owen, M. D. K. 2006. Tillage systems and seed dormancy effects on common waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) seedling emergence. Weed Sci. 54 :1037–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarty, W. H., Blaine, A., and Byrd, J. D. 2003. Cotton No-Till Production. Mississippi State University Cooperative Extension publication P1695.Google Scholar
Monks, C. D. and Patterson, M. G. 1996. Conservation Tillage Cotton Production Guide. Alabama Cooperative Extension System publication ANR-952.Google Scholar
Morgan, G. D., Baumann, P. A., and Chandler, J. M. 2001. Competitive impact of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) development and yield. Weed Technol. 15 :408–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service, United States Department of Agriculture. 1997. Agricultural Chemical Use Database, Upland Cotton 1996 Report. http://www.pestmanagement.info/nass/app_usage.cfm. Accessed: March 11, 2011.Google Scholar
[NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service, United States Department of Agriculture. 2001. Agricultural Chemical Use Database, Upland Cotton 2000 Report. http://www.pestmanagement.info/nass/app_usage.cfm. Accessed: March 11, 2011.Google Scholar
[NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service, United States Department of Agriculture. 2004. Agricultural Chemical Use Database, Upland Cotton 2003 Report. http://www.pestmanagement.info/nass/app_usage.cfm. Accessed: March 11, 2011.Google Scholar
Nichols, R. L., Bond, J., Culpepper, A. S., Dodds, D., Nandula, V., Main, C. L., Marshall, M. W., Mueller, T. C., Norsworthy, J. K., Price, A., Patterson, M., Scott, R. C., Smith, K. L., Steckel, L. E., Stephenson, D., Wright, D., and York, A. C. 2009. Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) spreads in the southern United States (U.S.). Resist. Pest Manage. Newsl. 18(2) :8–10.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K. 2007. Consultant perspectives on weed management needs in Arkansas cotton. Weed Technol. 21 :825–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K., Oliveira, M. J., Jha, P., Malik, M., Buckelew, J. K., Jennings, K. M., and Monks, D. W. 2008. Palmer amaranth and large crabgrass growth with plasticulture-grown Capsicum annuum . Weed Technol. 22 :296–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K., McClelland, M., Griffith, G., Bangarwa, S. K., and Still, J. 2010. Evaluation of legume cover crops and weed control programs in conservation-tillage, enhanced glyphosate-resistant cotton. Weed Technol. 24 :269–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K., McClelland, M., Griffith, G., Bangarwa, S. K., and Still, J. 2011. Evaluation of cereal and Brassicaceae cover crops in conservation-tillage, enhanced, glyphosate-resistant cotton. Weed Technol. 25 :6–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K., Smith, K. L., Scott, R. C., Steckel, L. E., Bond, J. A., Eubank, T. W., Stephenson, D. O., and Weirich, J. 2012a. Midsouth weed management survey with emphasis on Palmer amaranth. Beltwide Cotton Abstract. In press.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K., Ward, S., Shaw, D., Llewellyn, R., Nichols, R., Webster, T. M., Bradley, K., Frisvold, G., Powles, S., Burgos, N., Witt, W., and Barrett, M. 2012b. Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci. 60(special issue) :31–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phatak, S. C. 1998. Managing pests with cover crops. in Shirley, C., Bowman, G., and Cramer, C., eds. Managing Cover Crops Profitably. Burlington, VT : Sustainable Agriculture. Pp. 25–33.Google Scholar
Putnam, A. R. and DeFrank, J. 1983. Use of phytotoxic plant residues for selective weed control. Crop Prot. 2 :173–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, A. J., Monks, C. D., and Patterson, M. G. 2008. Early season pigweed control in conservation tillage cotton. http://hdl.handle.net/10113/32555. Accessed: April 18, 2011.Google Scholar
Reeves, D. W., Price, A. J., and Patterson, M. G. 2005. Evaluation of three winter cereals for weed control in conservation-tillage nontransgenic cotton. Weed Technol. 19 :731–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowland, M. W., Murray, D. S., and Verhalen, L. M. 1999. Full-season Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 47 :305–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushing, D. W., Murray, D. S., and Verhalen, L. M. 1985a. Weed interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). I. Bufflaobur (Solanum rostratum). Weed Sci. 33 :810–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushing, D. W., Murray, D. S., and Verhalen, L. M. 1985b. Weed interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). II. Tumble pigweed (Amaranthus albus). Weed Sci. 33 :815–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, J. D. 1967. The grain amaranths and their relatives: a revised taxonomic and geographic survey. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 54 :101–113.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. S. and Wilk, M. B. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52 :591–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. T., Baker, R. V., and Steele, G. L. 2000. Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) impacts on yield, harvesting, and ginning in dryland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 14 :122–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Street, J. E., Snipes, C. E., McGuire, J. A., and Buchanan, G. A. 1985. Competition of a binary weed system with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 33 :807–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teasdale, J. R. and Daughtry, C. S. T. 1993. Weed suppression by live and desiccated hairy vetch (Vicia villosa). Weed Sci. 41 :207–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar