Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:00:11.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of chaff and chaff lines on weed seed survival and seedling emergence in Australian cropping systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2020

Michael J. Walsh Open the ORCID record for Michael J. Walsh [Opens in a new window] ,
Annie E. Rayner ,
Annie Ruttledge  and
John C. Broster
Michael J. Walsh*
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Sydney Institute of Agriculture, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Annie E. Rayner
Affiliation:
Undergraduate Student, University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
Annie Ruttledge
Affiliation:
Research Scientist, Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Leslie Research Facility, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
John C. Broster
Affiliation:
Senior Technical Officer, Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (Charles Sturt University and NSW Department of Primary Industries), Charles Sturt University, New South Wales, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: Michael J. Walsh, University of Sydney, 380 Werombi Road, Brown Hill, NSW 2570, Australia Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chaff lining and chaff tramlining are harvest weed seed control (HWSC) systems that involve the concentration of chaff material containing weed seed into narrow (20 to 30 cm) rows between or on the harvester wheel tracks during harvest. These lines of chaff are left intact in the fields through subsequent cropping seasons in the assumption that the chaff environment is unfavorable for weed seed survival. The chaff row environment effect on weed seed survival was examined in field studies, and chaff response studies determined the influence of increasing amounts of chaff on weed seedling emergence. The objectives of these studies were to determine the influences of (1) chaff lines on the summer–autumn seed survival of selected weed species and (2) chaff type and amount on rigid ryegrass seedling emergence. There was frequently no difference (P > 0.05) in seed survival of four weed species (rigid ryegrass, wild oat, annual sowthistle, and turnip weed) when seeds were placed beneath or beside chaff lines. In one instance, wild oat seed survival was increased (P < 0.05) when seed were placed beneath compared to beside a chaff line. The pot studies determined that increasing amounts of chaff consistently resulted in decreasing numbers of rigid ryegrass seedlings emerging through chaff material. The suppression of emergence broadly followed a linear relationship in which there was approximately a 2.0% reduction in emergence with every 1,000 kg ha–1 increase in chaff material. This relationship was consistent across wheat, barley, canola, and lupin chaff types, indicating that the physical presence of the chaff was more important than chaff type. These studies suggested that chaff lines may not affect the survival over summer–autumn of the contained weed seeds but that the subsequent emergence of weed seedlings will be restricted by high amounts of chaff (>40,000 kg ha–1).

Keywords

Annual sowthistleSonchus oleraceus L.rigid ryegrassLolium rigidum Gaud.turnip weedRapistrum rugosum (L.) All.wild oat Avena fatua L.barleyHordeum vulgare L.canolaBrassica napus L.lupinLupinus angustifolius L.wheatTriticum aestivum L.Chaff liningchaff tramliningharvest weed seed control
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , June 2021 , pp. 515 - 521
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Drew Lyon, Washington State University

References

ABARES (2020) Australian Commodity Statistics. https://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares. Accessed: August 20, 2020Google Scholar
Baraibar, B, Daedlow, D, De Mol, F, Gerowitt, B (2012) Density dependence of weed seed predation by invertebrates and vertebrates in winter wheat. Weed Res 52:79–87 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BOM (2020) Bureau of Meteorology Weather and Climate Statistics. http://www.bom.gov.au. Accessed: August 20, 2020Google Scholar
Boutsalis, P, Gill, GS, Preston, C (2012) Incidence of herbicide resistance in rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) across Southeastern Australia. Weed Technol 26:391–398 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, NS, Van Acker, RC (2003) The effects of depth and fluctuating soil moisture on the emergence of eight annual and six perennial plant species. Weed Sci 51:725–730 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broster, JC, Pratley, JE, Ip, RHL, Ang, L, Seng, KP (2019) A quarter of a century of monitoring herbicide resistance in Lolium rigidum in Australia. Crop Pasture Sci 70:283–293 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broster, JC, Walsh, MJ, Chambers, AJ (2016) Harvest weed seed control: the influence of harvester set up and speed on efficacy in south-eastern Australia wheat crops. Pages 38–41 in Randall R, Lloyd S, Borger C, eds. 20th Australasian Weeds Conference. Perth, Western Australia: Weeds Society of Western AustraliaGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Abugho, SB (2013) Effect of crop residue on seedling emergence and growth of selected weed species in a sprinkler-irrigated zero-till dry-seeded rice system. Weed Sci 61:403–409 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Gill, G, Preston, C (2006a) Factors affecting seed germination of annual sowthistle (Sonchus oleraceus) in southern Australia. Weed Sci 54:854–860 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Gill, G, Preston, C (2006b) Factors affecting turnipweed (Rapistrum rugosum) seed germination in southern Australia. Weed Sci 54:1032–1036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, BS, Gill, G, Preston, C (2006c) Influence of tillage systems on vertical distribution, seedling recruitment and persistence of rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) seed bank. Weed Sci 54:669–676 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheam, AH, Code, GR (1995) The biology of Australian weeds. 24. Raphanus raphanistrum L. Plant Prot Quart 10:2–13Google Scholar
Chee-Sanford, JC (2008) Weed seeds as nutritional resources for soil Ascomycota and characterization of specific associations between plant and fungal species. Biol Fertility Soils 44:763–771 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, AS, Fu, X, Schutte, BJ, Berhow, MA, Dalling, JW (2016) Interspecific variation in persistence of buried weed seeds follows trade-offs among physiological, chemical, and physical seed defenses. Ecol Evol 6:6836–6845 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duke, SO (2012) Why have no new herbicide modes of action appeared in recent years? Pest Manage Sci 68:505–512 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goggin, DE, Powles, SB, Steadman, KJ (2012) Understanding Lolium rigidum seeds: The key to managing a problem weed? Agronomy 2:222 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, AC, Young, FL, Elliott, LF, Douglas, CL (1991) Rhizobacteria suppressive to the weed downy brome. Soil Sci Soc Am J 55:722–727 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremer, RJ (1993) Management of weed seed banks with microorganisms. Ecol Appl 3:42–52 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kulkarni, SS, Dosdall, LM, Willenborg, CJ (2015) The role of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in weed seed consumption: a review. Weed Sci 63:355–376 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mickelson, JA, Grey, WE (2006) Effect of soil water content on wild oat (Avena fatua) seed mortality and seedling emergence. Weed Sci 54:255–262 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, NL, Miller, PCH, Orson, JH, Froud-Williams, RJ (2009) The effect of wheat straw residue on the emergence and early growth of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) and oilseed rape (Brassica napus). Eur J Agron 30:151–162 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mwendwa, JM, Brown, WB, Wu, H, Weston, PA, Weidenhamer, JD, Quinn, JC, Weston, LA (2018) The weed suppressive ability of selected Australian grain crops; case studies from the Riverina region in New South Wales. Crop Protect 103:9–19 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohadi, S, Mashhadi, HR, Tavakol-Afshari, R (2011) Effects of storage and burial on germination responses of encapsulated and naked seeds of turnipweed (Rapistrum rugosum) to light. Weed Sci 59:483–488 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, MJ, Martinez, NJ, Powles, SB (2014) Multiple herbicide-resistant Lolium rigidum (annual ryegrass) now dominates across the Western Australian grain belt. Weed Res 54:314–324 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, B, Strek, HJ (2018) Herbicide discovery in light of rapidly spreading resistance and ever-increasing regulatory hurdles. Pest Manage Sci 74:2211–2215 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pollard, AT (2018) Seeds vs fungi: an enzymatic battle in the soil seedbank. Seed Sci Res 28:197–214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rebetzke, GJ, Bruce, SE, Kirkegaard, JA (2005) Longer coleoptiles improve emergence through crop residues to increase seedling number and biomass in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Soil 272:87 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Somody, CN, Nalewaja, JD, Miller, SD (1984) Wild oat (Avena fatua) seed environment and germination. Weed Sci 32:502–507 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spafford Jacob, HS, Minkey, DM, Borger, C, Gallagher, RH (2006) Variation in post-dispersal weed seed predation in a crop field. Weed Sci 54:148–155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, MJ, Aves, C, Powles, SB (2017a) Harvest weed seed control systems are similarly effective on rigid ryegrass. Weed Technol 31:178–183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, MJ, Broster, J, Chauhan, B, Rebetzke, G, Pratley, J (2019) Weed control in cropping systems—past lessons and future opportunities. Pages 153–173 in Pratley J, Kirkegaard J, eds. Australian Agriculture in 2020: From Conservation to Automation. Wagga Wagga: Agronomy Australia and Charles Sturt UniversityGoogle Scholar
Walsh, MJ, Newman, P (2007) Burning narrow windrows for weed seed destruction. Field Crops Res 104:24–40 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, MJ, Ouzman, J, Newman, P, Powles, SB, Llewellyn, R (2017b) High levels of adoption indicate that harvest weed seed control is now an established weed control practice in Australian cropping. Weed Technol 31:1–7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, MJ, Powles, SB (2014) High seed retention at maturity of annual weeds infesting crop fields highlights the potential for harvest weed seed control. Weed Technol 28:486–493 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, LA (2005) History and current trends in the use of allelopathy for weed management. Hort Technol 15:529–534 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Widderick, MJ, Walker, SR, Sindel, BM, Bell, KL (2010) Germination, emergence, and persistence of Sonchus oleraceus, a major crop weed in subtropical Australia. Weed Biol Manage 10:102–112 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, MM, Mortensen, DA, Doran, JW (1998) Assessment of weed and crop fitness in cover crop residues for integrated weed management. Weed Sci 46:595–603 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wuest, SB, Albrecht, SL, Skirvin, KW (2000) Crop residue position and interference with wheat seedling development. Soil Till Res 55:175–182 CrossRefGoogle Scholar