Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:32:09.990Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of CGA-277476 on Efficacy of Postemergence Graminicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Eric W. Palmer
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Box 9555, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762
David R. Shaw*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Box 9555, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762
James C. Holloway JR.
Affiliation:
Novartis Crop Protection Corporation, Delta Research Station, Greenville, MS 38701
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted at three Mississippi locations to evaluate potential antagonism when postemergence graminicides were tank-mixed with CGA-277476 and to determine if the antagonism could be overcome with an increase in graminicide rate. At all locations when the 1X rate of clethodim, fluazifop-P, or quizalofop was tank-mixed with 79 g ai/ ha CGA-277476, johnsongrass, broadleaf signalgrass, and barnyardgrass control was reduced 5 to 30%. When the graminicide rates were increased to 1.5X, antagonism was still present for fluazifop-P and quizalofop. However, 156 g ai/ha clethodim overcame the antagonism when tank-mixed with 79 g/ha CGA-277476 compared to 105 g/ha clethodim. CGA-277476 alone controlled barnyardgrass and broadleaf signalgrass 38 to 63% and johnsongrass 60 to 85%. There were no differences in soybean yields with graminicides applied alone or tank-mixed with CGA-277476.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1996. Expert Herbicide. Greensboro, NC: Novartis Crop Protection Corp Technical Bull, CGA-220-00005-A. 4 pp.Google Scholar
Bjelk, L. A. and Monaco, T. J. 1992. Effect of chlorimuron and quizalofop on fatty acid biosynthesis. Weed Sci. 40:16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrd, J. D. Jr., and York, A. C. 1987. Interaction of fluometuron and MSMA with sethoxydim and fluazifop. Weed Sci. 35:270276.Google Scholar
Chernicky, J. P., Gossett, B. J., and Murphy, T. R. 1984. Factors influencing control of annual grasses with sethoxydim or RO-13- 8895. Weed Sci. 32:174177.Google Scholar
Colby, S. R. 1967. Calculating synergistic and antagonistic responses of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croon, K. A. and Merkle, M. G. 1988. Effects of bentazon, imazaquin, or chlorimuron on haloxyfop or fluazifop-P efficacy. Weed Technol. 2:3640.Google Scholar
Dowler, C. C. 1997. Weed survey–southern states. Grass crops subsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 50:227272.Google Scholar
Ferreira, K. L. and Coble, H. D. 1994. Effect of DPX-PE350 on the efficacy of graminicides. Weed Sci. 42:222226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godley, J. L. and Kitchen, L. M. 1986. Interaction of acifluorfen with fluazifop for annual grass control. Weed Sci. 34:936941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holshouser, D. L. and Coble, H. D. 1990. Compatibility of sethoxydim with five postemergence broadleaf herbicides. Weed Technol. 4:128133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. G. and Frans, R. E. 1991. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in soybeans (Glycine max) with postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 5:8791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, D. L. 1995. Influence of adjuvants on antagonism of graminicides by broadleaf herbicides. Weed Technol. 9:741747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kells, J. J., Meggitt, W. M., and Penner, D. 1984. Absorption, translocation, and activity of fluazifop-butyl as influenced by plant growth stage and environment. Weed Sci. 32:143149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kidder, D. and Johnson, M. D. 1997. Grass control in soybeans with CGA-277476; alone, in sequential, and in tank-mix programs. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 37:1.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. 1993. A 16-yr survey on levels of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in Arkansas, Louisiana, and Mississippi. Weed Sci. 41:669677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. and Anderson, J. M. 1981. The technical and economic effects of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 29:245252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minton, B. W., Kurtz, M. E., and Shaw, D. R. 1989a. Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control with grass and broadleaf weed herbicide combinations. Weed Sci. 37:223227.Google Scholar
Minton, B. W., Shaw, D. R., and Kurtz, M. E. 1989b. Postemergence grass and broadleaf herbicide interactions for red rice (Oryza sativa) control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 3:329334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, P. F. and Coble, H. D. 1992. Antagonism of graminicide activity on annual grass species by imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 6:333338.Google Scholar
Rhodes, G. N. Jr., and Coble, H. D. 1984. Influence of application variables on antagonism between sethoxydim and bentazon. Weed Sci. 32:436441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sims, B. D. and Oliver, L. R. 1990. Mutual influences of seedling johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense), sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 38:139147.Google Scholar
Whitwell, T., Wehtje, G., Walker, R. H., and McGuire, J. A. 1985. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in soybeans (Glycine max) with postemergence grass herbicides applied alone and in mixtures. Weed Sci. 33:673678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. S. and Hayes, R. M. 1984. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) competition in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 32:498501.Google Scholar