Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:51:57.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Adjuvants on Itchgrass (Rottboellia cochinchinensis) Control in Corn (Zea mays) with Nicosulfuron and Primisulfuron1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Ronald E. Strahan
Affiliation:
Louisiana Cooperative Extension Service, 252 Knapp Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
James L. Griffin*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 302 Life Sciences Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
David L. Jordan
Affiliation:
Northeast Research Station, P.O. Box 438, St. Joseph, LA 71366
Donnie K. Miller
Affiliation:
Northeast Research Station, St. Joseph, LA 71366
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

In field experiments, nicosulfuron at 35 g ai/ha controlled itchgrass in corn 28 d after treatment better than primisulfuron at 39 g ai/ha (80 vs. 44%). Control with both herbicides was greater when applied to six-leaf itchgrass than to 10-leaf and with the addition of nonionic surfactant than with an organosilicone surfactant and methylated seed oil blend. Weed control for nicosulfuron plus nonionic surfactant resulted in corn yield approximately 1.5 times that of primisulfuron plus nonionic surfactant and 1.6 times that of nicosulfuron plus an organosilicone surfactant and methylated seed oil blend. When primisulfuron was applied with organosilicone surfactant and methylated seed oil rather than nonionic surfactant, corn yield was reduced by 25%. For nicosulfuron with nonionic surfactant, corn yield averaged approximately twice that of the nontreated check. In other field experiments, itchgrass control 28 d after treatment with nicosulfuron was enhanced with addition of an organosilicone and nonionic surfactant blend or methylated seed oil (83 and 78%, respectively) compared with nonionic surfactant (69%). Nicosulfuron was less effective when applied with crop oil concentrate or organosilicone surfactants compared with nonionic surfactant.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1 Published with approval of the Vice Chancellor and Director of Research, Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, as manuscript 99-38-0401. Research was conducted in partial fulfillment of requirements for the M.S. degree in Weed Science at Louisiana State University.
Current address: Crop Science Department, Box 7620, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 1998. Louisiana's Suggested Chemical Weed Control Guide for 1998. Louisiana Coop. Ext. Serv. Pub. 1565. Louisiana State University Agriculture Center. 183 p.Google Scholar
Bridgemohan, P. and Brathwaite, R.A.I. 1989. Weed management strategies for the control of Rottboellia cochinchinensis in maize in Trinidad. Weed Res. 29: 433440.Google Scholar
Bridgemohan, P. and Brathwaite, R.A.I. 1991. Seed survival and patterns of seedling emergence studies of Rottboellia cochinchinensis (Lour.) W. Clayton in cultivated soils. Weed Res. 31: 265272.Google Scholar
Field, R. J. and Bishop, N. G. 1988. Promotion of stomatal infiltration of glyphosate by an organosilicone surfactant reduces the critical rainfall period. Pestic. Sci. 24: 5562.Google Scholar
Fisher, H. H., Lopez, F., Margate, L., Elliot, P., and Burril, L. 1985. Problems in control of Rottboellia exaltata L. f. in maize in Bukidnon Province, Mindanao, Philippines. Weed Res. 25: 93102.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. L. 1991. Itchgrass (Rottboellia cochinchinensis) control options in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 5: 426429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, J. L. and Lencse, R. J. 1992. Preemergence control of itchgrass (Rottboellia cochinchinensis) in sugarcane. J. Am. Soc. Sugarcane Technol. 12: 6570.Google Scholar
Hall, D. W. and Patterson, D. T. 1992. Itchgrass—Stop the trains? Weed Technol. 6: 239241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harger, T. R., Vidrine, P. R., and Nester, P. R. 1982. Control and management of itchgrass. Louis. Agric. 25 (4): 2021, 24.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds: Distribution, and Biology. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii. 609 p.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L. 1996. Adjuvants and growth stage affect purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) control with chlorimuron and imazethapyr. Weed Technol. 10: 359362.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Vidrine, P. R., Griffin, J. L., and Reynolds, D. B. 1996. Influence of adjuvants on efficacy of clethodim. Weed Technol. 10: 738743.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L. and Burns, A. B. 1997. Influence of adjuvants on hemp sesbania (Sesbania exaltata) control by chlorimuron. Weed Technol. 11: 1923.Google Scholar
Kapusta, G., Tominda, K., and Bailey, J. A. 1991. Johnsongrass control in corn with preplant incorporated and postemergence herbicides. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 48:231.Google Scholar
Miller, D. K., Griffin, J. L., and Richard, E. P. Jr. 1998. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control and rainfastness with glyphosate and adjuvants. Weed Technol. 12: 617622.Google Scholar
Millhollon, R. W. 1965. Growth characteristics and control of Rottboellia exaltata L.f., a new weed in sugarcane. Sugar Bull. 44 (5): 8288.Google Scholar
Millhollon, R. W. 1975. Weed Watch. Weeds Today. 6 (4): 20.Google Scholar
Mueller, T. C., Bridges, D. C., and Banks, P. A. 1989. Postemergence johnsongrass control in corn. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:44.Google Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D., Palczynski, J., and Manthey, F. A. 1990. Imazethapyr efficacy with adjuvants and environment. Weed Technol. 4: 765770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandula, V. K., Curran, W. S., Roth, G. W., and Hartwig, N. L. 1995. Effectiveness of nicosulfuron and primisulfuron on wirestem muhly (Muhlenbergia frondosa) in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 9: 331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nester, P. R., Harger, T. R., and Geaghan, J. P. 1984. Itchgrass (Rottboellia exaltata) response to control practices in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 27: 7782.Google Scholar
Obrigawitch, T. T., Kenyon, W. H., and Kuratle, H. 1990. Effect of application timing on rhizome johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control with DPXV9360. Weed Sci. 38: 4549.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. T. and Quimby, P. C. Jr. 1978. Itchgrass-A potential noxious weed in Mississippi. In Miss. Agric. For. Exp. Stn. Res. Rep. 3 (18). 3 p.Google Scholar
Reddy, K. N. and Singh, M. 1992. Organosilicone adjuvant effects on glyphosate efficacy and rainfastness. Weed Technol. 6: 361365.Google Scholar
Reynolds, D. B., Vidrine, P. R., Griffin, J. L., Richard, P. A., and Perrit, A. L. 1989. Rate by timing response of new postemergence herbicides in corn. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:53.Google Scholar
Sharma, D. and Zelaya, O. 1986. Competition and control of itchgrass (Rottboellia exaltata) in maize (Zea mays). Trop. Pest Manag. 32: 101104. Strahan, R. E., J. L. Griffin, and L. R. LaMotte. 1995. Itchgrass interference and control in corn. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 48:183.Google Scholar
Tweedy, M. J. and Kapusta, G. 1995. Nicosulfuron and primisulfuron eradicate rhizome johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 9: 748753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar