Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:56:44.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Imazethapyr Co-Application Interactions in Imidazolinone-Resistant Rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

John Caleb Fish ,
Eric P. Webster ,
David C. Blouin  and
Jason A. Bond
John Caleb Fish
Affiliation:
School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 104 Sturgis Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Eric P. Webster*
Affiliation:
School of Plant, Environmental, and Soil Science, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 104 Sturgis Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
David C. Blouin
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Statistics, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 45 Agricultural Administration Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Jason A. Bond
Affiliation:
Delta Research and Extension Center, Mississippi State University, Stoneville, MS 38776
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A study was conducted to evaluate interactions of imazethapyr co-application with propanil, thiobencarb, or a prepackaged mixture of propanil plus thiobencarb. At 7, 14, 21, and 49 d after treatment (DAT), synergism occurred for red rice treated with imazethapyr at 70 g ai ha−1 mixed with propanil plus thiobencarb at 1,680 and 3,360 g ai ha−1. A synergistic response was also observed with imazethapyr at 70 g ha−1 mixed with propanil at 1,680 g ha−1; however, all other co-applications evaluated resulted in a neutral response with no antagonism observed. At 7 DAT, antagonism was observed for barnyardgrass when treated with imazethapyr at 70 g ha−1 mixed with propanil plus thiobencarb at 1,680 g ha−1, propanil at 840 g ha−1, or thiobencarb at 840 and 1,680 g ha−1; however, a synergistic response occurred for barnyardgrass control at 14, 21, and 49 DAT with imazethapyr at 70 g ha−1 mixed with propanil plus thiobencarb at 3,360 g ha−1. The synergistic response observed for red rice and barnyardgrass control with a mixture of imazethapyr plus propanil plus thiobencarb can benefit producers by increasing control of red rice and barnyardgrass, and this mixture contains three herbicides with three different modes of action, which can be part of an overall resistance-management strategy in imidazolinone-resistant (IR) rice.

Se realizó un estudio para evaluar las interacciones de imazethapyr co-aplicado con propanil, thiobencarb, o en mezclas pre-empacadas de propanil más thiobencarb. A 7, 14, 21, y 49 días después del tratamiento (DAT), ocurrió un sinergismo en arroz rojo tratado con imazethapyr a 70 g ai ha−1 mezclado con propanil más thiobencarb a 1,680 y 3,360 g ai ha−1. También se observó una respuesta sinérgica con imazethapyr a 70 g ha−1 mezclado con propanil a 1,680 g ha−1. Sin embargo, todas las demás co-aplicaciones evaluadas resultaron en una respuesta neutral sin observarse ningún antagonismo. A 7 DAT, se observó un antagonismo en Echinochloa crus-galli tratada con imazethapyr a 70 g ha−1 mezclado con propanil más thiobencarb a 1,680 g ha−1, propanil a 840 g ha−1, o thiobencarb a 840 y 1,680 g ha−1. Sin embargo, una respuesta sinérgica ocurrió en el control de E. crus-galli a 14, 21, y 49 DAT con imazethapyr a 70 g ha−1 mezclado con propanil más thiobencarb a 3,360 g ha−1. La respuesta sinérgica observada en el control de arroz rojo y de E. crus-galli con mezclas de imazethapyr más propanil más thiobencarb pueden beneficiar a los productores al incrementar el control de estas dos malezas. Además, estas mezclas contienen tres herbicidas con tres modos de acción diferentes, lo que puede ser parte de una estrategia general de manejo de resistencia en arroz resistente a imidazolinone (IR).

Keywords

Imazethapyrpropanilthiobencarbbarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv.red rice, Oryza sativa L.rice, Oryza sativa L.antagonismneutral responsesynergism
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , December 2015 , pp. 689 - 696
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor for this paper: Prashant Jha, Montana State University.

References

Literature Cited

Akobundu, IO, Sweet, RD, Duke, WB (1975) A method of evaluating herbicide combinations and determining herbicide synergism. Weed Sci 23:20–25 Google Scholar
Ashton, FM, Monaco, TJ (1991) Weed Science: Principles and Practices. 3rd edn. New York: Wiley. 466 pGoogle Scholar
Avila, LA, Senseman, SA, McCauley, GN, Chandler, JM, O'Barr, JH (2005) Effect of flood timing on red rice (Oryza spp.) control with imazethapyr applied at different dry-seeded rice growth stages. Weed Technol 19:476–480 Google Scholar
Blouin, DC, Webster, EP, Bond, JA (2010) On a method of analysis for synergistic and antagonistic joint-action effects with fenoxaprop mixtures in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 24:583–589 Google Scholar
Blouin, DC, Webster, EP, Bond, JA (2011) On the analysis of combined experiments. Weed Technol 25:165–169 Google Scholar
Blouin, DC, Webster, EP, Zhang, W (2004) Analysis of synergistic and antagonistic effects of herbicides using nonlinear mixed-model methodology. Weed Technol 18:464–472 Google Scholar
Braverman, MP (1995) Weed control in rice (Oryza sativa) with quinclorac and bensulfuron coating of granular herbicides and fertilizer. Weed Technol 9:494–498 Google Scholar
Carlson, TP, Webster, EP, Salassi, ME, Bond, JA, Hensley, JB, Blouin, DC (2012) Economic evaluations of imazethapyr rates and timings on rice. Weed Technol 26:24–28 Google Scholar
Carlson, TP, Webster, EP, Salassi, ME, Hensley, JB, Blouin, DC (2011) Imazethapyr plus propanil programs in imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 25:204–211 Google Scholar
Colby, SR (1967) Calculating synergistic and antagonistic response of herbicide combinations. Weeds 15:20–22 Google Scholar
Craigmiles, JP (1978) Introduction. Pages 5–6 in Eastin, EF, ed. Red Rice Research and Control Tex Agric Exp Stat Bull 1270 Google Scholar
Crawford, SH, Jordan, DL (1995) Comparison of single and multiple applications of propanil and residual herbicides in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 9:153–157 Google Scholar
Croughan, TP (1994) Application of tissue culture techniques to the development of herbicide resistant rice. La Agric 37:25–26 Google Scholar
Flint, JL, Cornelius, PL, Barrett, M (1988) Analyzing herbicide interactions: a statistical treatment of Colby's method. Weed Technol 2:304–309 Google Scholar
Hatzios, KK, Penner, D (1985) Interactions of herbicides with other agrochemicals in higher plants. Rev Weed Sci 1:1–52 Google Scholar
Hydrick, DE, Shaw, DR (1994) Effects of tank-mix combinations of non-selective foliar and selective soil-applied herbicides on three weed species. Weed Technol 8:129–133 Google Scholar
Jordan, DL (1997) Efficacy of reduced rates of quinclorac applied with propanil or propanil plus molinate in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci 45:824–828 Google Scholar
Jordan, DL, Miller, DK, Crawford, SH (1998) Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in dry-seeded rice (Oryza sativa) with soil applied and postemergence herbicide programs. Weed Technol 12:69–73 Google Scholar
Khodayari, K, Smith, RJ Jr., Black, HL (1987) Red rice (Oryza sativa) control with herbicide treatments in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci 35:127–129 Google Scholar
Lanclos, DY, Webster, EP, Zhang, W (2002) Glufosinate tank-mix combinations in glufosinate-resistant rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 16:659–663 Google Scholar
Masson, JA, Webster, EP (2001) Use of imazethapyr in water-seeded imidazolinone-tolerant rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 15:103–106 Google Scholar
Morse, PM (1978) Some comments on the assessment of joint action in herbicide mixtures. Weed Sci 26:58–71 Google Scholar
Mueller, TC, Witt, WW, Barrett, M (1989) Antagonism of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control with fenoxaprop, haloxyfop, and sethoxydim by 2,4–D. Weed Technol 3:86–89 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Bangarwa, SK, Scott, RC, Still, J, Griffith, GM (2010) Use of propanil and quinclorac tank mixtures for broadleaf weed control on rice (Oryza sativa) levees. Crop Prot 29:255–259 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Burgos, NR, Scott, RC, Smith, KL (2007) Consultant perspectives on weed management needs in Arkansas rice. Weed Technol 21:832–839 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, SM, Shaw, DR, Llewellyn, RS, Nichols, RL, Webster, TM, Bradley, KW, Frisvold, G, Powles, SB, Burgos, NR, Witt, WW, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci 60(Special Issue 1):31−62 Google Scholar
Ottis, BV, Chandler, JM, McCauley, GN (2002) Imazethapyr application methods and sequences for imidazolinone-tolerant rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 17:526–533 Google Scholar
Pellerin, KJ, Webster, EP, Zhang, W, Blouin, DC (2003) Herbicide mixtures in water-seeded imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 17:836–841 Google Scholar
Pellerin, KJ, Webster, EP, Zhang, W, Blouin, DC (2004) Potential use of imazethapyr mixtures in drill-seeded imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 18:1037–1042 Google Scholar
Rhodes, GN Jr., Coble, HD (1984) Influence of bentazon on absorption and translocation of sethoxydim in goosegrass. Weed Sci 32:595–597 Google Scholar
Richburg, JS III, Wilcut, JW, Wiley, GW (1995) AC 263,222 and imazethapyr rates and mixtures for weed management in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol 9:801–806 Google Scholar
SAS Institute (2011) Base SAS 9.3 Procedures Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Google Scholar
SAS Institute (2008) SAS/STAT 9.2 User's Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Google Scholar
Shaner, DL, ed (2014) Herbicide Handbook. 10th edn. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. Pp 254–255 Google Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr. (1961) 3,4-dichloropropionanilide for control of barnyardgrass in rice. Weeds 9:318–322 Google Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr. (1965) Propanil and mixtures with propanil for weed control in rice. Weeds 13:236–238 Google Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr. (1981) Control of red rice (Oryza sativa) in water-seeded rice (O. sativa). Weed Sci 29:663–666 Google Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr., Hill, JE (1990) Weed control technology in U.S. rice. Pages 314–327 in Grayson, BT, Green, MB, Copping, LG, eds. Pest Management in Rice. London: United Kingdom: Elsevier Science Google Scholar
Webster, EP (2014) Weed management. Pages 54–81 in Saichuk, J, ed. Louisiana Rice Production Handbook. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Agricultural Center Pub 2321-5/14 rev Google Scholar
Webster, EP, Carlson, TP, Salassi, ME, Hensley, JB, Blouin, DC (2012) Imazethapyr plus residual herbicide programs for imidazolinone-resistant rice. Weed Technol 26:410–416 Google Scholar
Webster, EP, Masson, JA (2001) Acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides on imidazolinone-tolerant rice. Weed Sci 49:652–657 Google Scholar
Webster, EP, Shaw, DR (1997) Potential stale seedbed herbicide combinations for cotton. Miss Agric For Exp Stn Tech Bull 216. P 6 Google Scholar
Webster, TM (2004) Weed survey—southern states. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 57:404–426 Google Scholar
Zhang, W, Webster, EP, Selim, HM (2001) Effect of soil moisture on efficacy of imazethapyr in greenhouse. Weed Technol 15:355–359 Google Scholar