Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:37:29.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) Control in Full-Season No-Till Soybeans (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Carroll M. Moseley
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol., Physiol., Weed Sci., Va. Polytech. Inst. State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061
Edward S. Hagood Jr.
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Pathol., Physiol., Weed Sci., Va. Polytech. Inst. State Univ., Blacksburg, VA 24061

Abstract

Cyanazine and 2,4-D were the most effective herbicides for horseweed control before establishing full-season no-till soybeans. Paraquat plus 2,4-D was less effective than 2,4-D alone but superior to paraquat alone. Chlorimuron plus metribuzin or chlorimuron plus linuron was less effective than cyanazine but controlled horseweed better than metribuzin, linuron, or imazaquin. Herbicides were generally more effective when applied early. These studies indicate paraquat was antagonistic to 2,4-D for horseweed control when these herbicides were combined.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Brown, S. M., and Whitwell, T. 1988. Influence of tillage on horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Technol. 2:269270.Google Scholar
2. Claus, J. S. 1987. Chlorimuron-ethyl (Classic)®: A new broadleaf postemergence herbicide in soybeans. Weed Technol. 1:114115.Google Scholar
3. Congleton, W. F., Vancantfort, A. M., and Lignowski, E. M. 1987 Imazaqnin (Scepter)®: A new soybean herbicide. Weed Technol. 186188.Google Scholar
4. Conservation Tillage Information Center. 1989. 1988 National survey of conservation tillage practices. West Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
5. Crop Protection Chemicals Reference. 1987. Canopy®. p. 390. 3rd ed. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Pub. Co., New York.Google Scholar
6. Crop Protection Chemicals Reference. 1987. Gemini®. p. 421. 3rd ed. by Chemical and Pharmaceutical Pub. Co., New York.Google Scholar
7. Forney, D. R. 1987. Performance of cinmethylin in no-till soybeans in the Mississippi Delta. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:42.Google Scholar
8. Hagood, E. S., and Davis, P. H. 1986. Horseweed control in no-till corn and soybeans. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:26.Google Scholar
9. Henniger, C. G., Keeling, J. W., and Abernathy, J. R. 1989. Horseweed [Conyza canadensis (L.)] control in conservation tillage systems. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 29:28.Google Scholar
10. Johnson, Q. R., and Webb, F. J. 1987. Weed suppression from cover crops in full-season no-till soybeans. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:46.Google Scholar
11. Kaufman, L. M., and Ritter, R. L. 1986. Early preplant applications of cyanazine in full-season no-tillage soybeans. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:25.Google Scholar
12. Kells, J. J., and List, G. A. 1986. Horseweed [Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.] control in no-tillage soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 41:44.Google Scholar
13. Powell, M. G. 1987. Conservation tillage adoption: a survey of research and education needs. Conservation Tillage Information Center. West Lafayette, IN.Google Scholar
14. Ritter, R. L., and Kaufman, L. M. 1989. The utility of HOE-039866 in no-till soybeans. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:2.Google Scholar
15. Shelby, P. W., and Hayes, R. M. 1988. Preplant horseweed control for no-till cotton and soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 41:294.Google Scholar
16. Wilson, H. P., Hines, T. E., Bellinder, R. R., and Grande, J. A. 1985. Comparisons of HOE-39866, SC-0224, paraquat and glyphosate in no-till corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 33:531536.Google Scholar
17. Wilson, J. S., and Worsham, A. D. 1988. Combinations of nonselective herbicides for difficult to control weeds in no-till corn (Zea mays) and soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 36:648652.Google Scholar