Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-xfwgj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T18:06:16.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) Control in Tall Fescue (Festuca arundinacea) and Clover (Trifolium sp.) Pastures with Mixtures of 2,4-D and Picloram

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Joseph E. Beeler
Affiliation:
Plant Sciences Department, 252 Ellington Plant Science Building, 2431 Joe Johnson Drive, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-4561
G. Neil Rhodes
Affiliation:
Plant Sciences Department, 252 Ellington Plant Science Building, 2431 Joe Johnson Drive, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-4561
Gary E. Bates
Affiliation:
Plant Sciences Department, 252 Ellington Plant Science Building, 2431 Joe Johnson Drive, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-4561
Christopher L. Main
Affiliation:
Plant Sciences Department, 252 Ellington Plant Science Building, 2431 Joe Johnson Drive, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-4561
Thomas C. Mueller*
Affiliation:
Plant Sciences Department, 252 Ellington Plant Science Building, 2431 Joe Johnson Drive, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996-4561
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Herbicide treatments (4:1 ratio of 2,4-D amine:picloram) at 0.7 and 1.4 kg ae/ha at early postemergence (10- to 15-cm horsenettle height), midpostemergence (early flower), and late postemergence (fruit initiation) applied both early and late in the growing season provided >80% horsenettle control. Horsenettle density at season's end in all treated plots was less than 0.25 stems/m2, whereas untreated plots contained about 5 stems/m2. Horsenettle control the next spring was between 47 and 66% for all rates and application timings, and horsenettle density in treated plots was less than 3 stems/m2 as opposed to about 6 stems/m2 in the untreated plots. Clover drilled into the treated area the year after herbicide application was injured, indicating clover establishment the season after application of this package mixture would be difficult.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Albert, W. B. 1960. Control of horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) in pastures. Weed Sci. 8:680682.Google Scholar
Banks, P. A., Kirby, M. A., and Santelmann, P. W. 1977. Influence of postemergence and subsurface layered herbicides on horsenettle and peanuts. Weed Sci. 25:58.Google Scholar
Banks, P. A. and Santelmann, P. W. 1978. Influence of subsurface layered herbicides on horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) and various crops. Agron. J 70:58.Google Scholar
Bradbury, H. E. and Aldrich, R. 1956. A study of horsenettle and its control. Proc. Northeast. Weed Control Conf 10:232233.Google Scholar
Breeden, G. K. and Rhodes, G. N. Jr. 2001. Broadleaf weed management demonstrations in Tennessee pastures. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 54:167168.Google Scholar
Dale, J. B. and Edwards, B. C. 1979. Control of horsenettle in bermudagrass pastures. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 32:8586.Google Scholar
Gorrell, R. M., Bingham, S. W., and Foy, C. L. 1981. Control of horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) fleshy roots in pastures. Weed Sci. 29:586589.Google Scholar
Gunn, C. R. and Gaffney, F. B. 1974. Seed Characteristics of 42 Economically Important Solanaceae in the United States. USDA Technical Bull. 1471. 31 p.Google Scholar
Hackett, N. M., Murray, D. S., and Weeks, D. L. 1987. Interference of horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) with peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Sci. 35:780784.Google Scholar
Ilnicki, R. D. and Fertig, S. N. 1962. Life History Studies as Related to Weed Control in the Northeast. #3 Horsenettle. Kingston, RI: Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Rhode Island Bull. 369. 27 p.Google Scholar
Neville, H. W. 1950. A comparison of the effectiveness of certain chemicals in controlling horsenettle and other weeds in corn. Proc. Northeast. Weed Control Conf 4:217219.Google Scholar
Nichols, R. L., Cardina, J., and Gaines, T. P. 1991. Growth, reproduction, and chemical composition of horsenettle (Solanum carolinense). Weed Technol. 5:513520.Google Scholar
Palmer, R. D. and Miears, F. 1975. Horsenettle control in pastures of Saline County, Texas. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 28:8290.Google Scholar
Prostko, E. P., Ingerson-Mahar, J., and Majek, B. A. 1994. Postemergence horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) control in field corn (Zea Mays). Weed Technol. 8:441444.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1998. SAS User's Guide. Version 7.0. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1028 p.Google Scholar
Smith, A. E. and Calvert, G. V. 1980. Factors influencing the control of horsenettle in perennial pastures. Georgia Agricultural Experiment Station Bull. 255. 15 p.Google Scholar
Wehtje, G., Wilcut, J. W., Vint Hicks, T., and Sims, G. R. 1987. Reproductive biology and control of Solanum dimidiatum and Solanum carolinense . Weed Sci. 35:356359.Google Scholar
Whaley, C. M. and Vangessel, M. J. 2002a. Horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) control with a field corn (Zea mays) weed management program. Weed Technol. 16:293300.Google Scholar
Whaley, C. M. and Vangessel, M. J. 2002b. Effects of fall herbicide treatments and stage of horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) senescence on control. Weed Technol. 16:301308.Google Scholar
Whitwell, T., Banks, P., Basler, E., and Santelmann, P. W. 1980. Glyphosate absorption and translocation in bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) and activity in horsenettle (Solanum carolinense). Weed Sci. 28:9396.Google Scholar
Worsham, A. D. 1982. Tillage effects on agricultural weed populations. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 35:300.Google Scholar