Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T04:26:45.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Herbicides for Winter-hardy Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Control in Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Jeffrey A. Koscelny
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Thomas F. Peeper
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078

Abstract

Diclofop at 840 g ai/ha, fenoxaprop at 90 g ai/ha, and imazamethabenz at 530 g ai/ha fall-applied controlled wild oat 96, 99, and 95% and increased wheat grain yields 26, 29, and 24%, respectively. These herbicides controlled wild oat over a wider range of growth stages than current labels indicate. The same treatments applied in March were less effective for wild oat control and did not increase wheat yield.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bell, A. R., and Nalewaja, J. D. 1968. Competition of wild oat in wheat and barley. Weed Sci. 16:505508.Google Scholar
Cousens, R. D., Weaver, S. E., Martin, T. D., Blair, A. M., and Wilson, J. 1991. Dynamics of competition between wild oats (Avena fatua L.) and winter cereals. Weed Res. 31:203210.Google Scholar
Cudney, D. W., Jordan, L. S., Holt, J. S., and Reints, J. S. 1989. Competitive interactions of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and wild oats (Avena fatua) grown at different densities. Weed Sci. 37:538543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, K. L., Peeper, T. F., and Epplin, F. M. 1990. Economic returns from cheat (Bromus secalinus) control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 4:306313.Google Scholar
Harker, K. N., and O'Sullivan, P. A. 1991. Effect of imazamethabenz on green foxtail, tartary buckwheat and wild oat at different growth stages. Can. J. Plant Sci. 71:821829.Google Scholar
Krenzer, E., and Doye, D. 1988. Economic evaluation of wheat varieties grown for forage plus grain. Current Rep. 2100. Coop. Ext. Serv., Div. Agric., Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater, OK. 7 p.Google Scholar
Martin, M. P. L. D., and Field, R. J. 1988. Influence of time of emergence of wild oat on competition with wheat. Weed Res. 28:111116.Google Scholar
Martin, R. J., Cullis, B. R., and McNamara, D. W. 1987. Prediction of wheat yield loss due to competition by wild oats (Avena spp.). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 38:487499.Google Scholar
Mason, J. F., 1979. Chemical wild oat (Avena fatua) control in hard red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). . Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater. 53 p.Google Scholar
McNeil, W. K., 1978. Effect of wild oat herbicides on wild oats, wheat, and barley. . Oklahoma State Univ., Stillwater. 77 p.Google Scholar
Miller, S. D., and Alley, H. P. 1987. Weed control and rotational crop response with AC 222,293. Weed Technol. 1:2933.Google Scholar
Miller, S. D., and Page, M. S. 1986. Wild oat control in spring wheat with fenoxaprop formulations. West. Soc. Weed Sci. Res. Prog. Rep. p 223226.Google Scholar
O'Donovan, J. T., Remy, E. A., O'Sullivan, P. A., Dew, D. A., and Sharma, A. K. 1985. Influence of the relative time of emergence of wild oat (Avena fatua) on yield loss of barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 33:498503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peier, D., 1964. Evaluation and classification of Avena ssp. collected from naturalized populations in Texas. . Texas A&M Univ., College Station. 109 p.Google Scholar
Pillmoor, J. B., and Caseley, J. C. 1984. The influence of growth stage and foliage or soil application on the activity of AC 222,293 against Alopecurus myosuroides and Avena fatua . Ann. Appl. Biol. 105:517527.Google Scholar