Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:02:08.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbicide Tank Mixtures for Broad-Spectrum Weed Control in Florida Citrus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Amit J. Jhala ,
Analiza H. M. Ramirez ,
Stevan Z. Knezevic ,
Patrick Van Damme  and
Megh Singh
Amit J. Jhala*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, NE 68583-0915
Analiza H. M. Ramirez
Affiliation:
Citrus Research and Education Center, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, 700 Experiment Station Road, Lake Alfred, FL 33850-2299
Stevan Z. Knezevic
Affiliation:
Haskell Agricultural Laboratory, University of Nebraska, 57905 866th Road, Concord, NE 68728-2828
Patrick Van Damme
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Tropical and Subtropical Agronomy and Ethnobotany, Faculty of Bio-Science Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, Gent 9000, Belgium Institute of Tropics and Subtropics, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Kamycka 129, Prague 6, Suchdol, 165 21, Czech Republic
Megh Singh
Affiliation:
Citrus Research and Education Center, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, 700 Experiment Station Road, Lake Alfred, FL 33850-2299
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weed control in Florida citrus is primarily based on herbicides. Saflufenacil, a POST-applied herbicide is recently registered for broadleaf weed control in citrus. Saflufenacil has very limited grass activity; therefore, it should be tank mixed with graminicides or broad-spectrum herbicides to increase the spectrum of weed control. Greenhouse and field experiments were conducted at two locations (Polk County and Orange County, FL) to evaluate the efficacy and potential antagonism or synergy of saflufenacil and sethoxydim applied alone or tank mixed, and various two- and three-way mixes with glyphosate or pendimethalin. The results suggested that tank mixing saflufenacil and sethoxydim had neither synergistic nor antagonistic effect on broadleaf and grass weed control, respectively. Tank mixing pendimethalin with saflufenacil and sethoxydim improved broadleaf and grass weed control and reduced weed density and biomass, compared with saflufenacil or sethoxydim applied alone or tank mixed at 45 and 60 d after treatment (DAT). Glyphosate tank mixed with saflufenacil and sethoxydim provided > 90% control of broadleaf and grass weeds at 15 DAT, reduced density ≤ 8 plants m−2, and reduced biomass < 95 g m−2 at 60 DAT. Glyphosate applied alone was less effective than it was when tank mixed with saflufenacil and sethoxydim or pendimethalin for broadleaf and grass weed control, indicating an additive effect of tank mixture on glyphosate efficacy. It is concluded that saflufenacil can be tank mixed with sethoxydim for control of broadleaf and grass weeds without antagonism on the efficacy of either herbicide; however, tank mixing saflufenacil and sethoxydim with glyphosate or pendimethalin provided long-term, broad-spectrum weed control in Florida citrus.

El control de malezas en cítricos en Florida está basado principalmente en herbicidas. Saflufenacil, un herbicida aplicado POST, fue registrado recientemente para el control de malezas de hoja ancha en cítricos. Saflufenacil tiene actividad muy limitada sobre gramíneas; por lo que debe ser mezclado en tanque con graminicidas o herbicidas de amplio espectro para incrementar el espectro de control de malezas. Se realizaron estudios de invernadero y de campo en dos localidades (condados Polk y Orange en Florida) para evaluar la eficacia y el antagonismo o sinergismo potencial de saflufenacil y sethoxydim aplicados solos o en mezcla en tanque, y varias mezclas en dos y tres formas con glyphosate o pendimethalin. Los resultados sugirieron que mezclar en tanque saflufenacil y sethoxydim no tuvo efectos sinérgicos ni antagónicos en el control de malezas de hoja ancha o gramíneas, respectivamente. El mezclar en tanque pendimethalin con saflufenacil y sethoxydim mejoró el control de malezas de hoja ancha y gramíneas y redujo la densidad y biomasa de malezas a 45 y 60 días después del tratamiento (DAT), en comparación con saflufenacil o sethoxydim aplicados individualmente o en mezcla en tanque. Glyphosate mezclado en tanque con saflufenacil y sethoxydim brindó >90% de control de malezas de hoja ancha y gramíneas a 15 DAT, redujo la densidad ≤8 plantas m−2 y redujo la biomasa <95 g m−2 a 60 DAT. Glyphosate aplicado solo fue menos efectivo que cuando se aplicó en mezcla en tanque con saflufenacil y sethoxydim o pendimethalin para el control de malezas de hoja ancha y gramíneas indicando un efecto aditivo de la mezcla en tanque sobre la eficacia de glyphosate. Se concluye que saflufenacil puede ser mezclado en tanque con sethoxydim para el control de malezas de hoja ancha y gramíneas sin causar antagonismo sobre la eficacia de ninguno de estos herbicidas. Sin embargo, el mezclar en tanque saflufenacil y sethoxydim con glyphosate o pendimethalin brindó un control de amplio espectro de malezas de larga duración en cítricos en Florida.

Keywords

Glyphosatependimethalinsaflufenacilsethoxydimcitrus, Citrus sppBroadleaf weedsgrass weedsherbicidespercent controltank mixtureweed biomassweed density
Type
Weed Management—Other Crops/Areas
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 129 - 137
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Affeldt, R. and Rice, C. 2008. Evaluation of Pendimethalin (Prowl) Tank Mixes on Roundup Ready Alfalfa. http://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog/html/sr/sr1093-e/sr1093_17.pdf. Accessed: May 12, 2011.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2009a. Poast® Plus herbicide product label. BASF Publication No. NVA 2009-04-025-0126. Research Triangle Park, NC : BASF. 15 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2009b. Prowl® H2O herbicide product label. BASF Publication No. NVA 2009-04-195-0043. Research Triangle Park, NC : BASF. 19 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2010a. Treevix™ herbicide product label. BASF Publication No. NVA 2010-04-321-0245. Research Triangle Park, NC : BASF. 10 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2010b. Verdict™ herbicide product label. BASF Publication No. NVA 2010-04-320-0138. Research Triangle Park, NC : BASF. 19 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2010c. OpTill™ herbicide product label. BASF Publication No. NVA 2010-04-323-0109. Research Triangle Park, NC : BASF. 17 p.Google Scholar
Beckie, H. J. 2006. Herbicide-resistant weeds: management tactics and practices. Weed Technol. 20 :793–814.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. R. and Penner, D. 1982. Compatibility of diclofop and BAS 9052 with bentazon. Weed Sci. 30 :458–462.Google Scholar
Chen, Y. and Penner, D. 1985. Combination effect of acifluorfen with crop oil concentrates and postemergence grass herbicides. Weed Sci. 33 :91–95.Google Scholar
Corkern, C. B., Reynolds, D. B., Vidrine, P. R., Griffin, J. L., and Jordan, D. L. 1998. Bromoxynil antagonizes johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control with graminicides. Weed Technol. 12 :205–208.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S. and York, A. C. 2000. Weed management in ultra narrow row cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 14 :19–29.Google Scholar
Duke, S. O., Lydon, J., Becerril, J. M., Shernam, T. D., Lehnen, L. P., and Matsumoto, H. 1991. Protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicides. Weed Sci. 39 :465–473.Google Scholar
Duke, S. O. and Powles, S. B. 2008. Glyphosate: a once-in-a-century herbicide. Pest Manag. Sci. 64 :319–325.Google Scholar
Frihauf, J. C., Stahlman, P. W., and Geier, P. W. 2010. Winter wheat and weed response to postemergence saflufenacil alone and in mixtures. Weed Technol. 24 :262–268.Google Scholar
Futch, S. H. and Singh, M. 2000. Field evaluation of chemical weed control in Florida citrus. Proc. Fla. State Hortic. Soc. 113 :68–74.Google Scholar
Futch, S. H. and Singh, M. 2007. Weeds in Florida citrus—new challenges and opportunities. Citrus Ind. 88 :15–17.Google Scholar
Futch, S. H. and Singh, M. 2011. Weeds. Pp. 139–151 in Rogers, M. E., Dewdney, M. M., and Spann, T. M., eds. Florida Citrus Pest Management Guide. Gainesville, FL : Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida SP 43.Google Scholar
Geier, P. W., Stahlman, P. W., and Charvat, L. D. 2009. Dose response of five broadleaf weeds to saflufenacil. Weed Technol. 23 :313–316.Google Scholar
Green, J. M. and Owen, M. D. K. 2011. Herbicide resistant crops: Utilities and limitations for herbicide-resistant weed management. J. Agric. Food Chem. 58 :5819–5829.Google Scholar
Grichar, W. J. 1991. Sethoxydim and broadleaf herbicide interaction effects on annual grass control in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 5 :321–324.Google Scholar
Grossman, K., Niggeweg, R., Christiansen, N., Looser, R., and Ehrhardt, T. 2010. The herbicide saflufenacil (Kixor™) is a new inhibitor of protoporphyrinogen IX oxidase activity. Weed Sci. 58 :1–9.Google Scholar
Harker, K. N. and O'Sullivan, P. A. 1991. Synergistic mixtures of sethoxydim and fluazifop on annual grass weeds. Weed Technol. 5 :310–316.Google Scholar
Holshouser, D. L. and Coble, H. D. 1990. Compatibility of sethoxydim with five postemergence broadleaf herbicides. Weed Technol. 4 :128–133.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Datta, A., Scott, J., and Charvat, L. D. 2009a. Adjuvants influenced saflufenacil efficacy on fall-emerging weeds. Weed Technol. 2009 23 :340–345.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Datta, A., Scott, J., and Charvat, L. D. 2009b. Interactions between saflufenacil and glyphosate on selected broadleaf weeds. Crop Manag. J. http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/sub/cm/research/2009/weeds/weeds.pdf. Accessed: April 30, 2012. DOI:.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z., Datta, A., Scott, J., and Charvat, L. D. 2010. Application timing and adjuvant type affected saflufenacil efficacy on selected broadleaf weeds. Crop Prot. 29 :94–99.Google Scholar
Liebl, R. A., Walter, H., Bowe, S. J., Holt, T. J., and Westberg, D. E. 2008. BAS 800H: A new herbicide for preplant burndown and preemergence dicot weed control. Proc. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Annu. Conf. 48:120. [Abstract].Google Scholar
Marshall, L. C., Somers, D. A., Dotray, P. A., Gengenback, B. G., Wyse, D. L., and Gronwald, J. W. 1992. Allelic mutations in acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase confer herbicide tolerance in maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83 :435–442.Google Scholar
Owen, L. N., Mueller, T. C., Maine, C. L., Bond, J., and Steckel, L. E. 2011. Evaluating rates and application timings of saflufenacil for control of glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) prior to planting no-till cotton. Weed Technol. 25 :1–5.Google Scholar
Rhodes, G. N. and Coble, H. D. 1984. Influence of application variables on antagonism between sethoxydim and bentazon. Weed Sci. 32 :436–441.Google Scholar
Sharma, S. D. and Singh, M. 2007. Effect of timing and rates of application of glyphosate and carfentrazone herbicides and their mixtures on the control of some broadleaf weeds. Hortic. Sci. 42 :1221–1226.Google Scholar
Sharma, S. D., Singh, M., and Futch, S. H. 2008. Glyphosate and carfentrazone herbicides for difficult to control weeds in citrus. Proc. Fla. State Hortic. Soc. 121 :1–5.Google Scholar
Shaw, D. R. and Arnold, J. C. 2002. Weed control from herbicide combinations with glyphosate. Weed Technol. 16 :1–6.Google Scholar
Singh, M., Malik, M. S., Ramirez, A. H. M., and Jhala, A. J. 2011a. Tank mix of saflufenacil with glyphosate and pendimethalin for weed control in Florida citrus. Hortic. Technol. 21 :606–615.Google Scholar
Singh, M., Sharma, S. D., Ramirez, A. H. M., and Jhala, A. J. 2011b. Glyphosate efficacy, absorption and translocation in selected four weed species common to Florida citrus. Hortic. Technol. 21 :599–605.Google Scholar
Taylor, S. E. 1996. Effect of Rate and Application Timing of Glyphosate to Control Sicklepod and Other Problem Weeds of the Mississippi Delta. MS dissertation. Fayetteville, AR : University of Arkansas. 116 p.Google Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2006. Situation and Outlook for Citrus. http://www.fas.usda.gov/htp/Hort_Circular/2006/02–06/02–2006%20Citrus%20Feature.pdf. Accessed: July 29, 2011.Google Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2010a. Citrus: Commercial Citrus Inventory. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Florida/Publications/Citrus/ccipre/ccipr10.pdf. Accessed: May 5, 2011.Google Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2010b. Citrus: 2009–2010 Citrus Summary: Production, Practices and Value. http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Florida/Publications/Citrus/cspre/cit92310.pdf. Accessed: May 5, 2011.Google Scholar
Waggoner, B. S., Mueller, T. C., Bond, J. A., and Steckel, L. E. 2011. Control of glyphosate resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis) with saflufenacil tank mixtures in no-till cotton. Weed Technol. 25 :310–315.Google Scholar
Young, B. G., Hart, S. E., and Wax, L. M. 1996. Interactions of sethoxydim and corn (Zea mays) postemergence broadleaf herbicides on three annual grasses. Weed Technol. 10 :914–922.Google Scholar