Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T21:40:23.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth Response of Rice (Oryza sativa) and Red Rice (O. sativa) in a Replacement Series Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Leopoldo E. Estorninos Jr. ,
David R. Gealy  and
Ronald E. Talbert
Leopoldo E. Estorninos Jr.*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
David R. Gealy
Affiliation:
Dale Bumpers National Rice Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2890 Hwy 130 East, P.O. Box 287, Stuttgart, AR 72160
Ronald E. Talbert
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A replacement series study was conducted in a greenhouse in 1998 and 1999 to evaluate the interference interactions among two rice cultivars and two red rice ecotypes. Plants were established in proportions of 3:0, 2:1, 1:2, and 0:3 (rice–red rice) plants/pot. Relative yield of Kaybonnet based on the shoot dry weight was lower than that of KatyRR or LA3, whereas PI 312777 was comparable to that of KatyRR and LA3. These results indicate that Kaybonnet was less competitive than PI 312777 when contrasted with KatyRR and LA3 red rice ecotypes. Kaybonnet (commercial rice cultivar) was dominated by both KatyRR (suspected rice × red rice cross) and LA3 (tall red rice ecotype) in tiller production, whereas PI 312777 (weed-suppressive cultivar) was comparable to either KatyRR or LA3. Both KatyRR and LA3 considerably reduced the leaf area of Kaybonnet. In contrast, PI 312777 reduced the growth of KatyRR, and its leaf area was comparable to that of LA3. The data suggest that high tillering capacity, as demonstrated by PI 312777, should be considered when breeding for rice cultivars that are competitive against weeds. This agronomic characteristic of rice may improve the success of reduced herbicide rate application programs.

Keywords

Red rice, Oryza sativa L. #3 ORYSA ‘KatyRR’, ‘LA3’rice, Oryza sativa L. ‘Kaybonnet’, ‘PI 312777’Leaf areared rice growthrelative yieldrice growthstrawhullDAE, days after emergenceRY, relative yieldRYT, relative yield total
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , June 2002 , pp. 401 - 406
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Carson, K. H., Cralle, H. T., Chandler, J. M., Miller, T. D., Bovey, R. W., Senseman, S. A., and Stone, M. J. 1999. Triticum aestivum and Lolium multiflorum interaction during drought. Weed Sci. 440–445.Google Scholar
Chavez, R. S. C. and Gealy, D. R. 1999. Response of barnyardgrass to selected suppressive rice cultivars in a replacement series study. In Norman, R. J. and Johnston, T. H., eds. Arkansas Rice Series 1998. Ark. Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Ser. 468: 37–42.Google Scholar
Clavijo, J. and Baker, J. B. 1987. Effects of the Interaction of Red Rice (Oryza sativa) and Two Rice (O. sativa) Cultivars on Some Morphological and Physiological Characteristics. Ph.D. dissertation. Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Louisiana. 29 p.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. 1986. On difficulties with replacement series methodology in mixture experiments. J. Appl. Ecol. 23: 125–137.Google Scholar
De Wit, C. T. and Van Den Bergh, J. P. 1965. Competition between herbage plants. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 13: 212–221.Google Scholar
Diarra, A., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Talbert, R. E. 1985a. Growth and morphological charactersitics of red rice (Oryza sativa) biotypes. Weed Sci. 33: 310–314.Google Scholar
Diarra, A., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Talbert, R. E. 1985b. Interference of red rice (Oryza sativa) with rice (O. sativa). Weed Sci. 33: 644–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eskelsen, S. R. and Crabtree, G. D. 1995. The role of allelopathy in buckwheat (Fagopyrum sagittatum) inhibition of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense). Weed Sci. 43: 70–74.Google Scholar
Fleming, G. F., Young, F. L., and Ogg, A. G. Jr. 1988. Competitive relationships among winter wheat (Tritichum aestivum), jointed goatgrass (Aegilops cylindrica), and downy brome (Bromus tectorum). Weed Sci. 36: 479–486.Google Scholar
Gealy, D. R., Dilday, R. H., and Rutger, J. N. 1998. Interaction of flush irrigation timing and suppression of barnyardgrass with potentially allelopathic rice lines. In Norman, R. J. and Johnston, T. H., eds. Arkansas Rice Series 1997. Ark. Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Ser. 467: 49–55.Google Scholar
[GRIN] Germplasm Resources Information Network. 2000. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington. Web page: http://www.ars-grin.gov.Google Scholar
Harper, J. L. 1977. Substitutive experiments. In Population Biology of Plants. New York: Academic Press. pp. 255–267.Google Scholar
Jolliffe, P. A., Minjas, A. N., and Runecles, V. C. 1984. A reinterpretation of yield relationships in replacement series experiments. J. Appl. Ecol. 21: 227–243.Google Scholar
Kwon, S. L., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Talbert, R. E. 1991. Interference of rice (Oryza sativa) densities in rice (O. sativa). Weed Sci. 39: 169–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberg, A. L., Young, L. J., and Higley, L. G. 1996. A comparison of two measures of competition. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 4: 393–403.Google Scholar
Pantone, D. J. and Baker, J. B. 1991. Reciprocal yield analysis of red rice (Oryza sativa) competition in cultivated rice. Weed Sci. 39: 42–47.Google Scholar
Radosevich, S. R. 1987. Methods of interactions among crops and weeds. Weed Technol. 1: 190–198.Google Scholar