Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:06:29.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ground Ivy (Glechoma hederacea) Populations Respond Differently to 2,4-D or Triclopyr

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Eric A. Kohler ,
Clark S. Throssell  and
Zachary J. Reicher
Eric A. Kohler
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, 915 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2054
Clark S. Throssell
Affiliation:
Golf Course Superintendents Association of America, 1421 Research Park Drive, Lawrence, KS 66049-3859
Zachary J. Reicher*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Purdue University, 915 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2054
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ground ivy is an invasive, perennial, broadleaf weed common in turf sites. A recent survey of lawn care professionals suggests ground ivy populations respond differently to herbicides. Our study was conducted to determine the variation in response among and within ground ivy populations to 2,4-D or triclopyr application. Ground ivy populations were sampled from nine sites in the United States and Canada. Leaf width, petiole length, and internode length varied by population by as much as 31, 36, and 45%, respectively. In a greenhouse study, applying 4.5 kg/ha 2,4-D or 0.9 kg/ha triclopyr to all populations resulted in a phytotoxic response that varied according to population by as much as 47% for 2,4-D and 31% for triclopyr. Random-amplified polymorphic DNA analysis identified 52 genotypes in the nine populations, and these genotypes varied in response to 2,4-D application in some populations. Difficulty in control of ground ivy with 2,4-D or triclopyr may be because of the presence of ecotypes and biotypes.

Keywords

2,4-Dtriclopyrground ivy, Glechoma hederacea L. # GLEHEBiotypeecotypeherbicide screeningresistancetoleranceDAT, days after treatmentFW, fresh weightLCO, lawn care operatorRAPD, random-amplified polymorphic DNARFW, regrowth fresh weight
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , September 2004 , pp. 566 - 574
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, W. P. 1996. Weed Science: Principles and Applications. Minneapolis–St Paul, MN: West. 388 p.Google Scholar
Bandeen, J. D., Stephenson, G. R., and Cowett, E. R. 1982. Discovery and distribution of herbicide-resistant weeds in North America. in LeBaron, H. M. and Gressel, J., eds. Herbicide Resistance in Plants. New York: J. Wiley. Pp. 9–55.Google Scholar
Beard, J. B. 1973. Turfgrass Science and Culture. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 658 p.Google Scholar
Birch, C. P. D. and Hutchings, M. J. 1994. Exploitation of patchily distributed soil resources by the clonal herb Glechoma hederacea . J. Ecol 82:653–664.Google Scholar
Bourdot, G. W., Harrington, K. C., and Popay, A. I. 1989. The appearance of phenoxy-herbicide resistance in New Zealand pasture weeds. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds 1:309–316.Google Scholar
Box, G. E. P. and Cox, D. R. 1964. An analysis of transformations. J. R. Stat. Soc B26:211–252.Google Scholar
DeGennaro, F. P. and Weller, S. C. 1984a. Differential susceptibility of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) biotypes to glyphosate. Weed Sci. 32:472–476.Google Scholar
DeGennaro, F. P. and Weller, S. C. 1984b. Growth and reproductive characteristics of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) biotypes. Weed Sci. 32:525–528.Google Scholar
Ellis, M. and Kay, Q. O. N. 1975. Genetic variation in herbicide resistance in scentless mayweed (Tripleurospermum inodorum (L.) Schultz Bip.) I. Differences between populations in response to MCPA. Weed Res 15:307–315.Google Scholar
Ellstrand, N. C. and Roose, M. L. 1987. Patterns of genotypic diversity in clonal plant species. Am. J. Bot 74:123–131.Google Scholar
Eriksson, O. and Bremer, B. 1993. Genet dynamics of the clonal plant Rubus saxatilis . J. Ecol 81:533–542.Google Scholar
Gill, L. S. 1979. Cytotaxonomic studies of the tribe Nepetiae (Labiatae) in Canada. Genetica 50:111–117.Google Scholar
Hanson, K. V. and Branham, B. E. 1988. Broadleaf weed control research update: II. Late fall weed control. Proc. 58th Annu. Mich. Turfgrass Conf 17:44–51.Google Scholar
Hatterman-Valenti, H., Owen, M. D. K., and Christians, N. E. 1996. Ground ivy (Glechoma hederacea L.) control in a Kentucky bluegrass turfgrass with borax. J. Environ. Hortic 14:101–104.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. M. 1964. Variations in ecotypes of Canada thistle. Weeds 12:167–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J. M. 1970. The response of Canada thistle ecotypes to 2,4-D, amitrole, and intensive cultivation. Weeds 18:253–255.Google Scholar
Hutchings, M. J. and Price, E. A. C. 1999. Glechoma hederacea L. (Nepeta glechoma Benth., N. hederacea (L.) Trev). J. Ecol 87:347–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, A., Griffiths, M., and Levy, M. eds. 1992. The New Royal Horticultural Society Dictionary of Gardening. Volume 2. New York: Stockton. 423 p.Google Scholar
Jasieniuk, M., Morrison, I. N., and Brûlé-Babel, A. L. 1995. Inheritance of dicamba resistance in wild mustard (Brassica kaber). Weed Sci. 43:192–195.Google Scholar
Klimes, L. 1997. Variation in autumnal growth of hermaphroditic clones of Glechoma hederacea originating from two geographical regions and two habitats. Preslia 69:175–183.Google Scholar
Klimyuk, V. I., Carroll, B. J., Thomas, C. M., and Jones, J. D. G. 1993. Alkali treatment for rapid preparation of plant material for reliable PCR analysis. Plant J 3:493–494.Google Scholar
Klingaman, T. E. and Oliver, L. R. 1996. Existence of ecotypes among populations of entireleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea var. integriuscula). Weed Sci. 44:540–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, E. A. 2002. Chemical and Cultural Control of Ground Ivy Populations: evidence of a 2,4-D-Tolerant Biotype and its Mechanism of Tolerance. Ph.D. dissertation. Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN. 172 p.Google Scholar
Lutman, P. J. W. and Snow, H. S. 1987. Further investigations into the resistance of chickweed (Stellaria media) to mecoprop. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds 3:901–908.Google Scholar
Miller, T. W., Shinn, S. L., and Thill, D. C. 2001. Cross-resistance in and chemical control of auxinic herbicide-resistant yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis). Weed Tech 15:293–299.Google Scholar
Mitich, L. W. 1994. Ground ivy. Weed Tech 8:413–415.Google Scholar
Price, E. A. C. and Hutchings, M. J. 1996. The effects of competition on growth and form in Glechoma hederacea . Oikos 75:279–290.Google Scholar
Radosevich, S., Holt, J., and Ghersa, C. 1997. Weed Ecology Implications for Management. New York: J. Wiley. 589 p.Google Scholar
Ray, T. B. and Still, C. C. 1975. Propanil metabolism in rice: a comparison of propanil amidase activities in rice plants and callus cultures. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 5:171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1999–2001. SAS User's Guide. Software release 8.02. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute Inc. Pp. 549–640.Google Scholar
Sexsmith, J. J. 1964. Morphological and herbicide susceptibility differences among strains of hoary cress. Weeds 12:19–22.Google Scholar
Shurtleff, M. C., Fermanian, T. W., and Randell, R. 1987. Controlling Turfgrass Pests. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 449 p.Google Scholar
Slade, A. J. and Hutchings, M. J. 1987a. The effects of light intensity on foraging in the clonal herb Glechoma hederacea . J. Ecol 75:639–650.Google Scholar
Slade, A. J. and Hutchings, M. J. 1987b. The effects of nutrient availability on foraging in the clonal herb Glechoma hederacea . J. Ecol 75:95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. 633 p.Google Scholar
Stubbendieck, J., Friisoe, G. Y., and Bolick, M. R. 1994. Weeds of Nebraska and the Great Plains. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska. 589 p.Google Scholar
Whitehead, C. W. and Switzer, C. M. 1963. The differential response of strains of wild carrot to 2,4-D and related herbicides. Can. J. Plant Sci 43:255–262.Google Scholar
Whitworth, J. W. and Muzik, T. J. 1967. Differential response of selected clones of bindweed to 2,4-D. Weeds 15:275–280.Google Scholar
Widen, B., Cronberg, N., and Widen, M. 1994. Genotypic diversity, molecular markers and spatial distribution of genets in clonal plants, a literature survey. Folia Geobot 29:245–263.Google Scholar
Wu, L., Bradshaw, A. D., and Thurman, D. A. 1975. The potential for evolution of heavy metal tolerance in plants. III. The rapid evolution of copper tolerance in Agrostis stolonifera . Heredity 34:165–187.Google Scholar