Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:03:02.272Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glyphosate–Insecticide Combination Effects on Weed and Insect Control in Cotton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Joseph H. Pankey ,
James L. Griffin ,
B. Rogers Leonard ,
Donnie K. Miller ,
Robert G. Downer  and
Richard W. Costello
Joseph H. Pankey
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, LSU AgCenter, 302 Life Sciences Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
James L. Griffin
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, LSU AgCenter, 104 Sturgis Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
B. Rogers Leonard
Affiliation:
Macon Ridge Location of the Northeast Research Station, LSU AgCenter, 212A Macon Ridge Road, Winnsboro, LA 71295
Donnie K. Miller*
Affiliation:
Northeast Research Station, LSU AgCenter, P.O. Box 438, St. Joseph, LA 71366
Robert G. Downer
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Statistics, LSU AgCenter, 161 Ag. Administration Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Richard W. Costello
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, LSU AgCenter, 302 Life Sciences Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field studies were conducted to evaluate weed control with combinations of glyphosate at 750 g ae/ha and the insecticides acephate (370 g ai/ha), dicrotophos (370 g ai/ha), dimethoate (220 g ai/ha), fipronil (56 g ai/ha), imidacloprid (53 g ai/ha), lambda-cyhalothrin (37 g ai/ha), oxamyl (280 g ai/ha), or endosulfan (420 g ai/ha) and insect control with coapplication of the herbicide with insecticides acephate, dicrotophos, dimethoate, and imidacloprid. Applying lambda-cyhalothrin or fipronil with glyphosate reduced control of hemp sesbania by 19 and 9 percentage points, respectively, compared with glyphosate alone. Acephate, dicrotophos, dimethoate, imidacloprid, lambda-cyhalothrin, oxamyl, and endosulfan did not affect hemp sesbania, pitted morningglory, prickly sida, and redweed control by glyphosate. Lambda-cyhalothrin and fipronil did not affect glyphosate control of weeds other than hemp sesbania. Addition of glyphosate to dicrotophos improved cotton aphid control 4 d after treatment compared with dicrotophos alone. Thrips control was improved with addition of glyphosate to imidacloprid. Insect control was not reduced by glyphosate regardless of insecticide.

Keywords

Acephate, O, S-dimethyl acetylphosphoramidothioatedicrotophos, 3-dimethoxyphosphinoyloxy-N,N-dimethylisocrotonamideglyphosateAESVIpitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. # IPOLAprickly sida, Sida spinosa L. # SIDSPredweed, Melochoia corchorifolia L. # MEOCOcotton, Gossypium hirsutum Lcotton aphids, Aphis gossypii Gloverthrips, Frankliniella spp.Aphidsherbicide–insecticide combinationspesticide compatibilitythripsDAT, days after treatmentPOST, postemergence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , September 2004 , pp. 698 - 703
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Current address: 25 S. Lake Dr., Monroe, LA 71203

References

Literature Cited

Ahrens, W. H. 1990. Enhancement of soybean (Glycine Max) injury and weed control by thifensulfuron-insecticide mixtures. Weed Technol. 4:524–528.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2001. Roundup UltraMax supplemental labeling for cotton with the Roundup Ready Gene in-crop applications. St. Louis, MO: Monsanto. 2 p.Google Scholar
Arle, H. F. 1968. Trifluralin-systemic insecticide interactions on seedling cotton. Weed Sci. 16:430–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagwell, R. D., Leonard, B. R., and Burris, G. et al. 2003. Cotton Insect Control 2003. Baton Rouge, LA: LCES Publ. 1083 5/2003 Rev. 5 p.Google Scholar
Biediger, D. L., Baumann, P. A., Weaver, D. N., Chandler, J. M., and Merkle, M. G. 1992. Interactions between primisulfuron and selected soil-applied insecticides in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 6:807–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boethel, D. J., Yanes, J. Jr., Troxclair, N. Jr., Sparks, A. Jr., Daigle, C., and Rester, D. 1984. Ultra-low volume applications of insecticides in soybean oil: effects on soybean insect control. in Proceeding of the Ag-Chem Uses of Soybean Oil. St. Louis, MO: American Soybean Association. Pp. 49–51.Google Scholar
Burris, E., Pavloff, A. M., Leonard, B. R., Graves, J. B., and Church, G. 1990. Evaluation of two procedures for monitoring populations of early season insect pests (Thysanoptera: Thripidae and Homoptera: Aphididae) in cotton under selected management strategies. J. Econ. Entomol 83:1064–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrd, J. D. Jr. 1999. Report of the 1998 cotton weed loss committee. in Dugger, P. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proceedings of the 1999 Beltwide Cotton Production Research Conference. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council. Pp. 727–730.Google Scholar
Byrd, J. D. Jr. and York, A. C. 1987. Interaction of fluometuron and MSMA with sethoxydim and fluazifop. Weed Sci. 35:270–276.Google Scholar
Campbell, J. R. and Penner, D. 1982. Enhanced phytotoxicity of bentazon with organophosphate and carbamate insecticides. Weed Sci. 30:324–326.Google Scholar
Costello, R. W., Griffin, J. L., Leonard, B. R., and Miller, D. K. 1998. Staple and insecticide combinations: insect and weed control. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc 51:56.Google Scholar
Ellis, J. M. and Griffin, J. L. 2002. Benefits of soil-applied herbicides in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 16:541–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, J. M. and Griffin, J. L. 2003. Glyphosate and broadleaf herbicide mixtures for soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 17:21–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Refai, A. R. and Mowafy, M. 1973. Interaction of propanil with insecticides absorbed from soil and translocated into rice plants. Weed Sci. 21:246–248.Google Scholar
Frazier, T. L., Nissen, S. J., Mortensen, D. A., and Meinke, L. J. 1993. The influence of terbufos on primisulfuron absorption and fate in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 41:664–668.Google Scholar
Frear, D. S. and Still, G. G. 1968. The metabolism of 3,4-dichloropropionanilide in plants. Partial purification and properties of an aryl acylamidase from rice. Phytochemistry 7:913–920.Google Scholar
Grunberg, A. 1967. Mode of action of mineral oils upon armoured scales (Diaspididae) in conjunction with low-volume application. Israel J. Entomol 2:179–186.Google Scholar
Hacskaylo, J., Walker, J. K. Jr., and Pires, E. G. 1964. Response of cotton to combinations of preemergence herbicides and systemic insecticides. Weeds 12:288–291.Google Scholar
Hayes, R. M., Yeargan, K. V., Witt, W. W., and Raney, H. G. 1979. Interaction of selected insecticide-herbicide combinations on soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 27:51–54.Google Scholar
Huckaba, R. M. and Coble, H. D. 1990. Effect of herbicides on soybean thrips (Sericothrips variabilis) in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 4:524–528.Google Scholar
Ishaaya, I., Austerweil, M., and Frankel, H. 1986. Effect of the petroleum oil Viron on toxicity and chemical residue of fenpropathrin applied against adult of Bemisia tabaci (Homoptera: Aleyrodidae) as high- and low-volume sprays. J. Econ. Entomol 79:596–599.Google Scholar
Johnson, E. M. 1996. Roundup Ready™ gene in cotton. in Dugger, P. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proceedings of the 1996 Beltwide Cotton Production Research Conference. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council. 51 p.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Frans, R. E., and McClelland, M. R. 1993. DPX-PE350 does not interact with early season insecticides in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 7:92–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jordan, D. L., York, A. C., Griffin, J. L., Clay, P. A., Vidrine, P. R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1997. Influence of application variables on efficacy of glyphosate. Weed Technol. 11:354–362.Google Scholar
Kapusta, G. and Krausz, R. F. 1992. Interaction of terbufos and nicosulfuron on corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 6:999–1003.Google Scholar
Khodayari, K., Smith, R. J. Jr., and Tugwell, N. P. 1986. Interaction of propanil and selected insecticides on rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci. 34:800–803.Google Scholar
Mascarenhas, V. J. and Griffin, J. L. 1997. Weed control interactions associated with Roundup and insecticide mixtures. in Dugger, P. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proceedings of the 1997 Beltwide Cotton Production Research Conference. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council. Pp. 799–800.Google Scholar
Matsumura, F. ed. 1985. Toxicological studies in insects. in Toxicology of Insecticides. New York: Plenum. Pp. 299–345.Google Scholar
Matsunaka, S. 1968. Propanil hydrolysis: inhibition in rice plants by insecticides. Science 160:1360–1361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morton, C. A., Harvey, R. G., Kells, J. J., Landis, D. A., Lueschen, W. E., and Fritz, V. A. 1993. In-furrow terbufos reduces field and sweet corn (Zea mays) tolerance to nicosulfuron. Weed Technol. 7:934–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratchford, K. and Burris, E. 1985. Effects of early season pesticides in cotton. LA Agric 28:14–15.Google Scholar
Schabenberger, O. and Pierce, F. J. 2002. Contemporary Statistical Models for the Plant and Soil Sciences. Washington, DC: CRC. Pp. 504–512.Google Scholar
Smith, R. J. and Tugwell, N. P. 1975. Propanil-carbofuran interactions in rice. Weed Sci. 23:176–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldrop, D. D. and Banks, P. A. 1983. Interactions of herbicides with insecticides in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 31:730–734.Google Scholar
Williams, M. R. 1999. Cotton insect losses 1998. in Dugger, P. and Richter, D. A., eds. Proceedings of the 1999 Beltwide Cotton Production Research Conference. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council. Pp. 785–806.Google Scholar
Wolfenbarger, D. A. 1964. Oils and surfactants alone, and insecticide-oil combinations for aphid control on turnips and cabbage. J. Econ. Entomol 57:571–574.Google Scholar
York, A. C. and Jordan, D. L. 1992. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) response to clomazone and insecticide combinations. Weed Technol. 6:796–800.Google Scholar