Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:27:43.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glyphosate With and Without Residual Herbicides in No-Till Glyphosate-Resistant Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Karen A. Corrigan  and
R. Gordon Harvey
Karen A. Corrigan
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
R. Gordon Harvey*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted in 1996 and 1997 near Arlington, WI, to compare the efficacy of glyphosate applied below registered rates in sequential and tank-mix combinations with residual herbicides to no-till, narrow-row, glyphosate-resistant soybean. In the sequential combinations of preplant (PP) residual herbicides and postemergence (POST) glyphosate study, glyphosate followed one of eight burndown treatments. Clomazone applied PP controlled 86% of common lambsquarters in 1996 when followed by 420 g ae/ha glyphosate early POST (EPOST). All other herbicide treatments controlled 94% or greater regardless of weed species, PP treatment, glyphosate timing, or glyphosate rate. The greatest soybean yields occurred in EPOST glyphosate applications in 1996 and late POST (LPOST) glyphosate applications in 1997. The only time PP residual herbicides were beneficial was prior to the LPOST glyphosate application in 1996. In the tank-mix POST combinations of glyphosate and residual herbicides study, glyphosate was applied alone or in combination with four residual herbicides. Soybean injury did not exceed 5% except in the glyphosate and imazethapyr combination in 1997. Control of common lambsquarters, velvetleaf, and giant foxtail was 90% or greater when averaged across all residual combinations and glyphosate timings and rates. Imazethapyr alone controlled velvetleaf 99% and giant foxtail 92% in 1997. When glyphosate was applied alone, soybean yields were similar at all glyphosate rates and application timings, except the 630 g/ha glyphosate LPOST resulted in a lower yield than 420 g/ha glyphosate LPOST. Only one residual herbicide, SAN 582, combined with glyphosate produced yields equivalent to the highest yielding treatments when averaged over both glyphosate rates and timings. Cloransulam added to 420 g/ha glyphosate EPOST and chlorimuron plus thifensulfuron and imazethapyr added to 420 g/ha glyphosate LPOST resulted in lower soybean yields compared to the same rate of glyphosate applied alone at the respective timings. Thus, no herbicide combination preformed better than glyphosate applied in a timely manner alone. However, in situations where early-season weed competition is severe and a timely glyphosate application is not possible, a PP residual herbicide may be beneficial.

Keywords

ChlorimuronclomazonecloransulamglyphosateimazethapyrpendimethalinSAN 582 (proposed name dimethenamid), 2-chloro-N-(2,4-dimethyl-3-thienyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-methylethyl)-acetamidethifensulfuroncommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. #3 CHEALgiant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm. # SETFAvelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medicus # ABUTHsoybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrCombinationssequentialtank-mixedEPOST, early postemergence7DPP, 7 d prior to plantingDAP, days after plantingfb, followed byLPOST, late postemergencePOST, postemergencePP, preplant
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 14 , Issue 3 , September 2000 , pp. 569 - 577
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ateh, C. M. and Harvey, R. G. 1999. Annual weed control by glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13: 394–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boerboom, C. M., Doll, J. D., Flashinski, R. A., Grau, C. R., and Wedberg, J. L. 1999. 1999 Pest Management In Wisconsin Field Crops. Madison, WI: Cooperative Extension Services Bull. A3646. 196 p.Google Scholar
Brown, S. M., Chandler, J. M., and Morrison, J. E. Jr. 1987. Weed control in a conservation tillage rotation in the Texas Blacklands. Weed Sci. 35: 695–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruce, J. A. and Kells, J. J. 1990. Horseweed (Conyza canadensis) control in no-tillage soybean (Glycine max) with preplant and preemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 4: 642–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruff, S. A. and Shaw, D. R. 1992. Tank-mix combinations for weed control in stale seedbed soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 6: 45–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, D. D. and Oplinger, E. S. 1990. Influence of tillage systems on annual weed densities and control in solid-seeded soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 38: 158–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buhler, D. D., Gunsolus, J. L., and Ralston, D. F. 1993. Common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) control in soybean (Glycine max) with reduced rates of bentazon and cultivation. Weed Sci. 41: 447–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardina, J., Regnier, E., and Harrison, K. 1991. Long-term tillage effects on seed banks in three Ohio soils. Weed Sci. 39: 186–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, J. B. and DeFelice, M. S. 1991. Timing of chlorimuron and imazaquin application in no-till soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 39: 232–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlin, D. L., Long, J. H., and Maddox, L. D. 1991. Using reduced rates of postemergence herbicides in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 5: 834–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hydrick, D. E. and Shaw, D. R. 1994. Effects of tank-mix combinations of non-selective foliar and selective soil-applied herbicides on three weed species. Weed Technol. 8: 129–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. G., Kendig, J. A., Massey, R. E., DeFelice, M. S., and Becker, C. D. 1997. Weed control and economic returns with postemergence herbicides in narrow-row soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 11: 453–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapusta, G. and Krausz, R. F. 1993. Weed control and yield are equal in conventional, reduced-, and no-tillage soybean (Glycine max) after 11 years. Weed Technol. 7: 443–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knake, E. L. 1996. Phenoxy herbicide use in field corn, soybean, sorghum, and peanut production in the United States. In Burnside, O. C., ed. Biologic and Economic Assessment of Benefits from Use of Phenoxy Herbicides in the United States. Washington, D.C.: USDA National Pesticide Impact Assessment Program Report 1-PA-96. pp. 87–102.Google Scholar
Martin, A. R. and Wicks, G. A. 1992. Weed control. In Hoffman, C. J., ed. Conservation Tillage Systems and Management—Crop Residue Management with No-Till, Ridge-Till, Mulch-Till. Chapter 12. Ames, IA: Mid West Plan Service. pp. 57–66.Google Scholar
Mickelson, J. A. and Renner, K. A. 1997. Weed control using reduced rates of postemergence herbicides in narrow and wide row soybean. J. Prod. Agric. 10: 431–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulugeta, D. and Boerboom, C. M. 2000. Critical time of weed removal in glyphosate-resistant Glycine max . Weed Sci. 48: 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, T. R. and Gossett, B. J. 1981. Influence of shading by soybean (Glycine max) on weed suppression. Weed Sci. 29: 610–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muyonga, C. M., DeFelice, M. S., and Sims, B. D. 1996. Weed control with reduced rates of four soil applied soybean herbicides. Weed Sci. 44: 148–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oplinger, E. S. 1980. Seeding Soybean in Narrow Rows. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Extension Publ. A3079. 4 p.Google Scholar
Sandberg, C. L., Retzinger, E. J., Derting, C. W., and Wu, C. H. 1985. Glyphosate and other herbicides for reduced tillage. Proc South. Weed Sci. Soc. 38: 86–89.Google Scholar
Stougaard, R. N., Kapusta, G., and Roskamp, G. 1984. Early preplant herbicide applications for no-till soybean (Glycine max) weed control. Weed Sci. 32: 293–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wax, L. M., Nave, W. R., and Cooper, R. L. 1977. Weed control in narrow and wide row soybeans. Weed Sci. 25: 73–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar