Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T18:37:17.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of Weed Control and Crop Tolerance with Co-application of Glyphosate and Pyraflufen-ethyl in Glyphosate-resistant Soybean (Glycine Max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Derek M. Scroggs ,
Donnie K. Miller ,
Paul R. Vidrine  and
Robert G. Downer
Derek M. Scroggs*
Affiliation:
Dean Lee Research Station, LSU AgCenter, 8105 Tom Bowman Dr., Alexandria, LA 71302
Donnie K. Miller
Affiliation:
Northeast Research Station, LSU AgCenter, P. O. Box 438, St. Joseph, LA 71366
Paul R. Vidrine
Affiliation:
Dean Lee Research Station, LSU AgCenter, 8105 Tom Bowman Dr., Alexandria, LA 71302
Robert G. Downer
Affiliation:
Department of Experimental Statistics, LSU AgCenter, 161 Agriculture Administration Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field trials were conducted to evaluate weed control and soybean tolerance with co-application of pyraflufen-ethyl and glyphosate. Pyraflufen-ethyl applied at 11, 23, or 45 g ai/ha in combination with glyphosate did not affect control of barnyardgrass, browntop millet, redroot pigweed, sicklepod, or smellmelon compared to glyphosate alone or co-applied with chlorimuron. Initial benefit (7 DAT) to pitted morningglory control with pyraflufen-ethyl plus glyphosate compared to glyphosate alone or co-applied with chlorimuron was not observed 28 DAT. Hemp sesbania control was increased by pyraflufen-ethyl at 45 g/ha plus glyphosate and glyphosate plus chlorimuron relative to glyphosate applied alone. Pyraflufen-ethyl plus glyphosate resulted in significant visual soybean injury, and a reduction in soybean yield was observed with pyraflufen-ethyl at 45 g/ha relative to glyphosate applied alone or in combination with chlorimuron. Results from a weed-free study confirmed crop injury and yield reduction potential with pyraflufen-ethyl plus glyphosate. Overall results suggest no benefit with respect to weed control or crop tolerance to pyraflufen-ethyl inclusion in a glyphosate-resistant soybean weed control program over that observed with currently registered co-application of glyphosate and chlorimuron.

Keywords

Chlorimuronglyphosatepyraflufen-ethylbarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauv. #3 ECHCGbrowntop millet, Brachiaria ramosa (L.) Stapf. # PANRAhemp sesbania, Sesbania exaltata (Raf.) Rydb. ex A. W. Hill # SEBEXpitted morningglory, Ipomoea lacunosa L. # IPOLAredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. # AMAREsicklepod, Senna obtusifolia L. # SENOBsmellmelon, Cucumis melo L. var. dudaim Naud. # CUMMDsoybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrCo-applicationcrop responsecrop tolerancepostemergencelf, leafPDS, post-directed sprayPPO, protoporphyrinogen oxidase
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , December 2006 , pp. 1035 - 1039
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous, , 2004. Specimen label for ET herbicide. Nichino America, Inc., Wilmington, DE., 19808. EPA reg. num. 71711–7.Google Scholar
Anonymous, , 2005. Specimen label for AIM herbicide. FMC Corporation, Agricultural Products Group, Philadelphia, PA 19103. EPA reg. num. 279–3194.Google Scholar
Anonymous, , 2006. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. Available at http://www.weedscience.org/in.asp. Accessed: April 13, 2006.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., York, A. C., Batts, R. B., and Jennings, K. M. 2000. Weed management in glufosinate- and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Tech. 14:77–88.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. L. and Habetz, R. J. 1989. Soybean (Glycine max) tolerance to preemergence and postemergence herbicides. Weed Tech. 3:459–462.Google Scholar
Groves, F. E., Smith, K. L., Meier, J. R., and Kelley, M. B. 2005. The effectiveness of carfentrazone as a post-directed treatment in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 58:28.Google Scholar
Kelly, S. T., McKnight, T. B., Miller, D. K., Perrit, A. L., and Lee, D. R. 2002. Evaluation of carfentrazone for weed control in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 55:15–16.Google Scholar
Mabuchi, T., Miura, Y., and Ohtsuka, T. 2002. Herbicidal activity and characteristics of pyraflufen-ethyl for controlling broad-leaved weeds in cereals. J. Pest. Sci. 27:39.Google Scholar
Miura, Y., Mabuchi, T., Higashimura, M., and Amanuma, T. 2003. Development of a new herbicide, pyraflufen-ethyl. J. Pest. Sci. 28:219–220.Google Scholar
Murata, S., Yamashita, A., Kimura, Y., Motoba, K., Mabuchi, T., and Miura, Y. 2002. Mechanisms of selective action of a protoporphyrinogen oxidase-inhibiting herbicide pyraflufen-ethyl between wheat (Triticum aestivum) and cleavers (Galium aparine). J. Pest. Sci. 27:47.Google Scholar
Payne, S. A. and Oliver, L. R. 2000. Weed control programs in drilled glyphosate-resistant soybean. Weed Technol. 14:413–422.Google Scholar
Schabenberger, O. and Pierce, F. J. 2002. Contemporary statistical models for the plant and soil sciences. Washington, D.C. CRC. 504–512.Google Scholar
Vanlieshout, L. A. and Loux, M. M. 2000. Interactions of glyphosate with residual herbicides in no-till soybean (Glycine max) production. Weed Technol. 14:480–487.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K. 2002. Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Champaign, IL Weed Science Society of America. 71–374.Google Scholar
Vidrine, P. R., Griffin, J. L., and Blouin, D. C. 2002. Evaluation of reduced rates of glyphosate and chlorimuron in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 16:731–736.Google Scholar
Vidrine, P. R. and Scroggs, D. M. 2003. Evaluation of ET-751 in a cotton post-directed program. Weed Science Annual Progress Report. 2003. LAES Research Summary RS-148. Pages 111–113.Google Scholar
Wait, J. D., Johnson, W. G., and Massey, R. E. 1999. Weed management with residual rates of glyphosate in no-till, narrow-row, glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13:478–483.Google Scholar
Webster, E. P., Bryant, K. S., and Earnest, L. D. 1999. Weed control and economics in non-transgenic and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13:586–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar