Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:28:44.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of Herbicides for Weed Control in Chicory (Cichorium intybus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Robert G. Wilson ,
John A. Smith  and
C. Dean Yonts
Robert G. Wilson*
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Scottsbluff, NE 69361
John A. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska, Scottsbluff, NE 69361
C. Dean Yonts
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Nebraska, Scottsbluff, NE 69361
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field trials were conducted in 1995 through 2002 to expand the development of chicory by determining the potential for tank mixtures of benefin, trifluralin, or pronamide applied preplant incorporated (PPI) and triflusulfuron methyl or imazamox postemergence (POST) for selective weed control in chicory. Lack of early-season weed control resulted in an 88% reduction in chicory root yield in 1995 to 1996 and an 85% reduction in 2001 to 2002 and demonstrated the susceptibility of chicory plants to early-season weed competition. In the first experiment, pronamide at 1.1 kg ai/ha PPI plus benefin at 1.3 kg ai/ha or trifluralin at 0.56 kg/ha were selective for chicory and controlled weed populations 90% on average with root yields that were 89% of the hand-weeded treatment. Triflusulfuron methyl POST at 17 g/ha caused early-season chicory injury. In the second experiment, trifluralin PPI at 0.56 kg/ha followed by imazamox POST at 36 g/ha controlled weeds 95% on average with a chicory root yield of 74 t/ha, which was 109% of the yield of the hand-weeded treatment.

Keywords

Benefinimazamoxpronamidetrifluralintriflusulfuron methylchicory, Cichorium intybus L. ‘Orchies’Belgium endivecompetitionroot yieldfb, followed byPOST, postemergencePPI, preplant incorporatedPRE, preemergence
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , September 2004 , pp. 540 - 544
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

∗ Published with the approval of the Director as paper 14017 Journal Series, Nebraska Agricultural Experiment Station.

References

Literature Cited

Baert, J. R. and Van Bockstaele, E. J. 1993. Cultivation and breeding of root chicory for inulin production. Ind. Crops Prod 1:229–234.Google Scholar
Corey, K. A. and Whitney, L. F. 1987. Production of Belgian endive: description and prospects for the United States. Hortic. Sci 22:1044. [Abstract].Google Scholar
Dewaele, E., Forlanti, G., Degrande, D., Nielsen, E., and Rambour, S. 1997. Biochemical characterization of chlorsulfuron resistance in Cichorium intybus L. var. Witloof. J. Plant Physiol 151:109–144.Google Scholar
Dusky, J. A. and Stall, W. M. 1996. Evaluation of imazethapyr for weed control in leafy vegetable crops. Weed Technol. 10:253–257.Google Scholar
Martin, A. R., Comfort, S. D., and Gaussoin, R. E. et al. 2003. Guide for Weed Management in Nebraska. Nebraska Cooperative Extension EC02-130-D. 144 p.Google Scholar
Mersie, W. and Elliott, J. 1993. Selectivity of pronamide and trifluralin in Belgian endive (Cichorium intybus). Weed Technol. 7:226–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Ende, W., Michiels, A., DeRoover, J., and Van Laere, A. 2002. Fructan biosynthetic and breakdown enzymes in dicots evolved from different invertases. Expression of fructan genes throughout chicory development. Sci. World J 2:1273–1287.Google Scholar
Van Waes, C., Baert, J. B., Carlier, L., and Van Bockstaele, E. 1998. A rapid determination of the total sugar content and the average inulin chain length in roots of chicory (Cichorium intybus L). J. Sci. Food Agric 76:107–110.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K. ed. 2002. Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. 493 pp.Google Scholar