Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:33:17.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of Flumioxazin and Other Herbicides for Weed Control in Gladiolus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Robert J. Richardson  and
Bernard H. Zandstra
Robert J. Richardson*
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
Bernard H. Zandstra
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two studies were conducted near Bronson, MI, to determine gladiolus tolerance and weed control with flumioxazin and other herbicide treatments. The first study was conducted in 2002, 2003, and 2004 to evaluate weed control and gladiolus injury with flumioxazin and 14 other preemergence treatments. Crop injury over the 3-yr period was less than 6% and was considered commercially acceptable with flumioxazin, linuron, oryzalin, pendimethalin, prometryn, S-metolachlor, and sulfentrazone. Gladiolus stand count, height, and flower count were similar to those of the nontreated control with these treatments. Clomazone, halosulfuron, imazamox, imazapic, mesotrione, oxyfluorfen, rimsulfuron, and trifloxysulfuron resulted in unacceptable crop injury. Of the acceptable treatments, only flumioxazin controlled common ragweed, yellow nutsedge, and foxtail species at least 68%. The second study was conducted in 2003 and 2004. Flumioxazin was evaluated at four rates, in mixtures with S-metolachlor and oryzalin, and in comparison with isoxaben plus oryzalin. Gladiolus injury did not exceed 6%. Common ragweed, annual grass, and yellow nutsedge control were at least 63% with all flumioxazin treatments.

Keywords

ClomazoneflumioxazinhalosulfuronimazamoximazapicisoxabenlinuronmesotrioneoryzalinoxyfluorfenpendimethalinprometrynrimsulfuronS-metolachlorsulfentrazonetrifloxysulfuroncommon ragweed, Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. # AMBELgiant foxtail, Setaria faberi Herrm. # SETFAlarge crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. # DIGSApurple robust foxtail, Setaria viridis var. robusta-purpurea Schr. # SETVIstinkgrass, Eragrostis cilianensis (All.) E. Mosher # ERACNyellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L. # CYPESgladiolus, Gladiolus sppCrop tolerancefloricultureherbicide efficacyWATweeks after treatment
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , June 2006 , pp. 394 - 398
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Altland, J. E., Gillam, C. H., and Wehtje, G. 2003. Weed control in field nurseries. Hortic. Technol. 13:9–14.Google Scholar
Altom, J. V., Cranmer, J. R., and Pawlek, J. W. 2000. Valor herbicide—the new standard for layby applications in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:159.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2004a. Agricultural Chemical Usage: 2003 Nursery and Floriculture Survey. United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Survey: Web page: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/nassr/other/pcu-bb/agcn0904.pdf. Accessed: August 7, 2005.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2004b. SureGuard herbicide product label. Walnut Creek, CA: Valent U.S.A. Corporation. 9 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2005a. Chateau WDG herbicide product label. Walnut Creek, CA: Valent U.S.A. Corporation. 15 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2005b. National Pesticide Information Retrieval System. Web page: http://state.ceris.purdue.edu/doc/mi/statemi.html. Accessed: August 8, 2005.Google Scholar
Armitage, A. M. and Laushman, J. M. 2003. Specialty Cut Flowers: The Production of Annuals, Perennials, Bulbs, and Woody Plants for Fresh and Dried Cut Flowers. Portland, OR: Timber Press. 636 p.Google Scholar
Askew, S. D., Wilcut, J. W., and Cranmer, J. R. 2002. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) and weed response to flumioxazin applied preplant and postemergence directed. Weed Technol. 16:184–190.Google Scholar
Belcher, J. L., Walker, R. H., Santen, E. V., and Wehtje, G. H. 2002. Nontuberous sedge and kyllinga species' response to herbicides. Weed Technol. 16:575–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, I. C., Askew, S. D., and Wilcut, J. W. 2002. Flumioxazin systems for weed management in North Carolina peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 16:184–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cranmer, J. R., Altom, J. V., Braun, J. C., and Pawlak, J. A. 2000. Valor herbicide: a new herbicide for weed control in cotton, peanuts, soybeans, and sugarcane. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:158.Google Scholar
Dunst, R. M., Bates, T. R., and Kirfman, G. W. 2004. Effectiveness of flumioxazin for weed control in vineyards. Proc. Northeast Weed Sci. Soc. 58:142.Google Scholar
Grey, T. L., Bridges, D. C., Hancock, H. G., and Davis, J. W. 2004. Influence of sulfentrazone rate and application method on peanut weed control. Weed Technol. 18:619–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, C. A., Neal, J. C., and Derr, J. F. 2005. Preemergence and postemergence control of Japanese stiltgrass (Microstegium vimineum). Weed Technol. 19:183–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, A. J., Wilcut, J. W., and Cranmer, J. R. 2002. Flumioxazin preplant burndown weed management in strip-tillage cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) planted into wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 16:762–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, A. J., Pline, W. A., Wilcut, J. W., Cranmer, J. R., and Danehower, D. 2004a. Physiological basis for cotton tolerance to flumioxazin applied postemergence directed. Weed Sci. 52:1–7.Google Scholar
Price, A. J., Wilcut, J. W., and Cranmer, J. R. 2004b. Physiological behavior of root-absorbed flumioxazin in peanut, ivyleaf morningglory (Ipomoea hederacea), and sicklepod (Senna obtusifolia). Weed Sci. 52:718–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, G. H., Askew, S. D., and Wilcut, J. W. 2001. Economic evaluation of diclosulam and flumioxazin systems in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Weed Technol. 15:360–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor-Lovell, S., Wax, L. M., and Bollero, G. 2002. Preemergence flumioxazin and pendimethalin and postemergence herbicide systems for soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 16:502–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unruh, J. B., Brecke, B. J., Dusky, J. A., and Godbehere, J. S. 2002. Fumigant alternatives for methyl bromide prior to turfgrass establishment. Weed Technol. 16:379–387.Google Scholar
[USDA] United States Department of Agriculture, NRCS. 2004. The PLANTS Database, Version 3.5. National Plant Data Center, Baton Rouge, LA: National Plant Data Center. Web page: http://plants.usda.gov/. Accessed: August 5, 2005.Google Scholar
Vencill, W. K. ed. 2002. Herbicide Handbook. 7th ed. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America. 352 p.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. W. and Hodges, J. C. 2005. Crop injury and nutsedge (Cyperus spp.) control in field-grown canna lilies (Canna × generalis). Proc. Weed Sci. Soc. Amer. 45:31–32.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. E., Nissen, S. J., and Thompson, A. 2002. Potato (Solanum tuberosum) variety and weed response to sulfentrazone and flumioxazin. Weed Technol. 16:567–574.Google Scholar
Woodland, D. W. 1991. Contemporary Plant Systematics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 582 p.Google Scholar
Yoshida, R., Sakaki, M., Sato, R., Haga, T., Nagano, E., Oshio, H., and Kamoshita, K. 1991. S-53482: a new N-phenyl phthalimide herbicide. Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf. Weeds 1:69–75.Google Scholar
Zandstra, B. H. and Particka, M. G. 2004. New herbicides for weed control in fruit trees. Proc. Northcentral Weed Sci. Soc. 59:161.Google Scholar