Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T02:58:57.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of broadcast and spot herbicide applications for narrowleaf goldenrod [Euthamia graminifolia (L.) Nutt.] management in lowbush blueberry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 July 2019

Muhammad H. Farooq ,
Qamar U. Zaman ,
Nathan S. Boyd  and
Scott N. White Open the ORCID record for Scott N. White [Opens in a new window]
Muhammad H. Farooq
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Department of Plant, Food, and Environmental Sciences, Dalhousie University Faculty of Agriculture, Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada
Qamar U. Zaman
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Engineering, Dalhousie University Faculty of Agriculture, Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada
Nathan S. Boyd
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, University of Florida Gulf Coast Research and Education Center, Wimauma, FL, USA
Scott N. White*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Plant, Food, and Environmental Sciences, Dalhousie University Faculty of Agriculture, Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada
*
Author for correspondence: Scott White, Department of Plant, Food, and Environmental Sciences, Dalhousie University, 50 Pictou Road, Truro, Nova Scotia B2N 5E3, Canada. (Email: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Goldenrods are common perennial weeds in lowbush blueberry fields in Nova Scotia. Management options are limited to mowing and suppression with POST mesotrione applications. The objectives of this research were to (1) compare efficacy of single versus sequential nonbearing-year POST mesotrione applications on goldenrod (2) identify the optimal interval between sequential POST mesotrione applications (3) evaluate nonbearing-year POST bicyclopyrone applications on goldenrod, and (4) evaluate nonbearing-year summer and fall herbicide spot treatments on goldenrod. POST mesotrione applications at 144 g ai ha−1 caused 39% to 77% injury but did not reduce goldenrod shoot density. In contrast, mesotrione applications at 144 g ai ha−1 followed by sequential mesotrione application at 14, 21, or 28 days after initial treatment caused greater than 90% injury to goldenrod and reduced both nonbearing- and bearing-year shoot density. POST bicyclopyrone applications at 50 g ai ha−1 caused 69% to 80% injury to goldenrod but did not reduce shoot density. A bicyclopyrone plus mesotrione tank mixture did not improve goldenrod control relative to mesotrione or bicyclopyrone alone. Summer spot applications of glyphosate (7.24 g ae L water−1), glufosinate (0.75 g ai L water−1), and mesotrione (0.72 g ai L water−1) consistently injured goldenrod and reduced both nonbearing- and bearing-year shoot density. Summer spot applications of bicyclopyrone (0.25 g ai L water−1), flazasulfuron (0.31 g ai L water−1), dicamba (1 g ae L water−1), dicamba plus diflufenzopyr (0.7 g ae L water−1 plus 0.3 g ai L water−1), triclopyr (1.68 g ai L water−1), clopyralid (0.08 g ai L water−1), tribenuron methyl (0.2 g ai L water−1), and foramsulfuron (0.2 g ai L water−1) injured goldenrod but did not consistently reduce shoot density. When these herbicides were evaluated as fall spot applications, only glyphosate reduced goldenrod shoot density in the year after application.

Keywords

Bradley Hanson, University of California, DavisBicyclopyroneclopyraliddicambadiflufenzopyrflazasulfuronforamsulfuronglufosinateglyphosatemesotrionetribenuron methyltriclopyrnarrowleaf goldenrod, Euthamia graminifolia (L.) Nutt.lowbush blueberry, Vaccinium angustifolium AitonCreeping herbaceous perennialsequential herbicideshoot densityvisual injury
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 33 , Issue 5 , October 2019 , pp. 739 - 747
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[AAFC] Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Pest Management Centre (2005) Crop Profile for Wild Blueberry in Canada. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. 39 pGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (2017) Wild Blueberry Factsheet C, 4, 2.0. Wild Blueberry IPM Weed Management Guide. Fredericton, NB, Canada: New Brunswick Department of Agriculture, Aquaculture, and Fisheries. 32 pGoogle Scholar
Armel, GR, Wilson, HP, Richardson, RJ, Hines, TE (2003) Mesotrione combinations for postemergence control of horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 17:65–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackshaw, RE (2005) Tillage intensity affects weed communities in agroecosystems. Pages 209–221 in Inderjit, S, ed. Invasive Plants: Ecological and Agricultural Aspects. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, NS, White, S (2010) PRE and POST herbicides for management of goldenrods (Solidago spp.) and black bulrush (Scirpus atrovirens) in wild blueberry. Weed Technol 24:446–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boydston, RA, Al-Khatib, K (2008) Exudation of mesotrione from potato roots injures neighboring plants. Weed Sci 56:852–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boydston, RA, Collins, HP, Alva, AK (2008) Control of volunteer potato (Solanum tuberosum) in sweet corn with mesotrione is unaffected by atrazine and tillage. Weed Technol 22:654–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, KW, Hagood, ES Jr (2002) Influence of sequential herbicide treatment, herbicide application timing, and mowing on mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris) control. Weed Technol 16:346–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, SJ, Donald, WW (1988) Fall-applied glyphosate for Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) control in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol 2:445–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claus, J, Behrens, R (1976) Glyphosate translocation and quackgrass rhizome bud kill. Weed Sci 24:149–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, C (2000) Herbicide fact sheet: triclopyr. J Pest Ref 20:12–19Google Scholar
Glass, VM, Percival, DC (2000) Challenges facing the pollination and fruit set in indigenous blueberries (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.). Fruit Var J 54:44–47Google Scholar
Hall, IV (1959) Plant populations in blueberry stands developed from abandoned hayfields and woodlots. Eco 40:742–743Google Scholar
Hartnett, D, Bazzaz, F (1985) The genet and ramet population dynamics of Solidago canadensis in an abandoned field. J Ecol 45:407–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivany, JA (1981) Quackgrass (Agropyron repens) control with fall-applied glyphosate and other herbicides. Weed Sci 29:382–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffery, LS, English, JR, Connell, J (1981) The effects of fall application of glyphosate on corn (Zea mays), soybeans (Glycine max), and johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense). Weed Sci 1:190–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, KIN (1985) Weed control in lowbush blueberries in Eastern Canada. Acta Hort 165:259–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, K, Kimball, E (1985) Tolerance and residues of hexazinone in lowbush blueberries. Can J Plant Sci 65:223–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, K, Specht, E (2002) Response of lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium) to hexazinone applied early in the fruiting year. Can J Plant Sci 82:781–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, KIN, Specht, EG (2004) Use of two sulfonyl urea herbicides in lowbush blueberry. Small Fruits Rev 3:257–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, KIN, Yarborough, DE (2004) An overview of weed management in the wild lowbush blueberry – past and present. Small Fruits Rev 3:229–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, MA, Christian, NE (2007) Mesotrione controls creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera) in Kentucky bluegrass. Weed Technol 21:402–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapusta, G, Krausz, RF (1993) Weed control and yield are equal in conventional, reduced-, and no-tillage soybean (Glycine max) after 11 years. Weed Technol 7:443–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lapointe, L, Rochefort, L (2001) Weed survey of lowbush blueberry fields in Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean, Québec, following eight years of herbicide application. Can J Plant Sci 81: 471–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCully, KV, Sampson, MG, Watson, AK (1991) Weed survey of Nova Scotia lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium) fields. Weed Sci 39:180–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, T, Libbey, C, Maupin, B (2012) Comparison of four management programs for control of established perennial weeds in blueberry. Acta Hortic 1017:147–152Google Scholar
Mitchell, G, Bartlett, DW, Fraser, TEM, Hawkes, TR, Holt, DC, Townson, JK, Wichert, RA (2001) Mesotrione: a new selective herbicide for use in maize. Pest Manag Sci 57:120–1283.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, KA, Renner, KA, Penner, D (2002) Yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) control and tuber yield with glyphosate and glufosinate. Weed Technol 16:360–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, LR, Ezell, AW, Yeiser, JL (2006) Imazapyr and triclopyr tank mixtures for basal bark control of woody brush in the southeastern United States. New Forests 31:173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, BD, Mackasey, MM (1989) Control of broadleaf weeds in turf with clopyralid and triclopyr combinations. Proc Northeast Weed Sci Soc 43:105–106Google Scholar
Payne, KK, Bradley, KW (2010) Herbicidal control of tall goldenrod in tall fescue hayfields. Forage Grazinglands 8:10–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pline, WA, Hatzios, KK, Hagood, ES (2000) Weed and herbicide-resistant soybean (Glycine max) response to glufosinate and glyphosate plus ammonium sulfate and pelargonic acid. Weed Technol 14:667–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pline, WA, Wu, J, Hatzios, KK (1999) Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of glufosinate in five weed species as influenced by ammonium sulfate and pelargonic acid. Weed Sci 1:636–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reicher, Z, Weisenberger, D, Morton, D, Branham, B, Sharp, W (2011) Fall applications of mesotrione for annual bluegrass control in Kentucky bluegrass. Appl Turf Grass Sci 81:80–90Google Scholar
Shaw, DR, Mack, RE (1991) Application timing of herbicides for the control of redvine (Brunnichia ovata). Weed Technol 5:125–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skelton, JJ, Sharp, W, Branham, BE (2012) Postemergence control of annual bluegrass with mesotrione in Kentucky bluegrass. HortScience 47:522–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprankle, P, Meggitt, WF, Penner, D (1975) Absorption, action, and translocation of glyphosate. Weed Sci 23:235–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steckel, GJ, Wax, LM, Simmons, FW, Phillips, WH (1997) Glufosinate efficacy on annual weeds is influenced by rate and growth stage. Weed Technol 1:484–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Almsick, A (2009) New HPPD-inhibitors–a proven mode of action as a new hope to solve current weed problems. Pest Man Sci 20:27–30Google Scholar
Vander Kloet, SP (1988) The Genus Vaccinium in North America. Ottawa ON, Canada: Agriculture CanadaGoogle Scholar
Werner, PA, Gross, RS, Bradbury, IK (1980) The biology of Canadian weeds: 45. Solidago canadensis L. Can J Plant Sci 60:1393–1409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whaley, CM, VanGessel, MJ (2002) Effect of fall herbicide treatments and stage of horsenettle (Solanum carolinense) senescence on control. Weed Technol 16:301–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, SN, Boyd, NS, Van Acker, RC (2016). Evaluation of aminocyclopyrachlor applied alone and in combination with registered herbicides for crop tolerance and weed control in wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.). Can J Plant Sci 96:11–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, SN, Webb, C (2018) Susceptibility of American burnweed (Erechtities hieraciifolius) to herbicides and clipping in wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.). Can J Plant Sci 98:147–154Google Scholar
Wilson, RG, Michiels, A (2003) Fall herbicide treatments affect carbohydrate content in roots of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) and dandelion (Taraxacum officinale). Weed Sci 51:299–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, L, Boyd, NS (2012) Management of spreading dogbane (Apocynum androsaemifolium) in wild blueberry fields. Weed Technol 26:777–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarborough, D, Bhowmik, P (1989) Effect of hexazinone on weed populations and on lowbush blueberries in Maine. Acta Hort 241:344–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarborough, DE (2009) 220-Wild Blueberry Culture in Maine. Fact Sheet No. 220, UMaine Extension No. 2088. https://extension.umaine.edu/blueberries/factsheets/production/wild-blueberry-culture-in-maine/. Accessed: April 15, 2017Google Scholar
Yarborough, DE, D’Appollonio, J (2009) 256-Mesotrione Use in Wild Blueberries. Fact Sheet No. 256, UMaine Extension No. 2147. https://extension.umaine.edu/blueberries/factsheets/weeds/256-mesotrione-use-in-wild-blueberries/. Accessed: June 9, 2019Google Scholar
Yarborough, DE, Hess, TM (1995) Control of bunchberry in wild blueberry fields. J Small Fruit Vit 3:125–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarborough, DE, Marra, MC (1997). Economic thresholds for weeds in wild blueberry fields. Acta Hort 446:293–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L, White, SN, Randall Olson, A, Pruski, K (2018). Evaluation of flazasulfuron for hair fescue (Festuca filiformis) suppression and wild blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.) tolerance. Can J Plant Sci 98:1293–1303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zollinger, RK, Penner, D, Kells, JJ (1992) Absorption, translocation, and foliar activity of clopyralid and tribenuron in perennial sowthistle (Sonchus arvensis). Weed Sci 40:528–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuris, NK, Wilson, RG, Nelson, LA (1987) Effects of plant growth stage on chlorsulfuron suppression of Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense) shoots and roots. Weed Technol 1:10–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar