Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T13:19:46.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficacy of Reduced Sulfentrazone Rates Applied Preemergence with Metribuzin in Potato (Solanum tuberosum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Pamela J. S. Hutchinson ,
Daniel M. Hancock  and
Brent R. Beutler
Pamela J. S. Hutchinson*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant, Soil, and Entomological Sciences, University of Idaho, Aberdeen, ID 83210
Daniel M. Hancock
Affiliation:
Aberdeen Research and Extension Center, University of Idaho, Aberdeen, ID 83210
Brent R. Beutler
Affiliation:
Aberdeen Research and Extension Center, University of Idaho, Aberdeen, ID 83210
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field trials were conducted with sulfentrazone at 53, 80, and 105 g ai/ha combined with 0, 420, and 560 g ai/ha metribuzin in a 3 by 3 factorial arrangement. Sulfentrazone and metribuzin combinations improved control of redroot pigweed, common lambsquarters, hairy nightshade, and volunteer oat compared with sulfentrazone applied alone. Kochia control was more than 90% regardless of metribuzin presence in the treatment. Sulfentrazone at 105 g/ha was needed for greater than 90% hairy nightshade control. Sulfentrazone alone or in combination with metribuzin did not provide greater than 89% volunteer oat control. Potato crop injury was less than 5% and total tuber yields increased as metribuzin rate increased from 0 to 560 g/ha, reflecting improved weed control as metribuzin rate increased.

Keywords

Metribuzinsulfentrazonepotato, Solanum tuberosum L. ‘Russet Burbank’common lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. #CHEALhairy nightshade, Solanum sarrachoides Sendter # SOLSAkochia, Kochia scoparia L. Shrad. # KCHSCredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. # AMAREvolunteer oats, Avena sativa L. # AVESACrop safetyherbicide injuryreduced ratesOM, organic matterWAT, weeks after treatment
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , December 2005 , pp. 954 - 958
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Allen, T. C. and Davis, J. R. 1982. Distribution of tobacco rattle virus and potato virus X in leaves, roots and fruits and/or seeds of naturally infected weeds. Am. Potato J. 59:149–153.Google Scholar
Alvarez, J. M., Stoltz, R. L., Baird, C. R., and Sandvol, L. E. 2003. Insects and their management. in Stark, J. C. and Love, S. L., eds. Potato Production Systems. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho Agricultural Communications. Pp. 205–239.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1991. United States Standards for Grades of Potatoes. F R Doc. 91-4371. Washington, DC. 7 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2001. Sencor DF 75% dry flowable herbicide label. EPA Reg. 264-738. Research Triangle Park, NC: Bayer CropScience. 22 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2004a. Spartan herbicide label. EPA Reg. 279-3189. Philadelphia, PA: FMC Corp. 13 p.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2004b. Spartan herbicide supplemental label. EPA Reg. 279-3189. Philadelphia, PA: FMC Corp. 7 p.Google Scholar
Bailey, W. A., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 2002. Response of potato (Solanum tuberosum) and selected weeds to sulfentrazone. Weed Technol. 16:651–658.Google Scholar
Boydston, R. A., Hutchinson, P. J. S., Ransom, C. V., Welch, L. L., and Knabke, J. J. 2001. Weed control with flumioxazin and sulfentrazone in Pacific Northwest potato production. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 54:3.Google Scholar
Dirks, J. T., Johnson, W. G., Smeda, R. J., Wiebold, W. J., and Massey, R. E. 2000. Reduced rates of sulfentrazone plus chlorimuron and glyphosate in no-till, narrow-row, glyphosate-resistant Glycine max . Weed Sci. 48:618–627.Google Scholar
Eberlein, C. V., Guttieri, M. J., and Schaffers, W. C. 1992. Hairy nightshade (Solanum sarrachoides) control in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) with bentazon plus additives. Weed Technol. 6:85–90.Google Scholar
Grey, T. L., Bridges, D. C., Hancock, H. G., and Davis, J. W. 2004. Influence of sulfentrazone rate and application method on peanut weed control. Weed Technol. 18:619–625.Google Scholar
Grey, T. L., Walker, R. H., Wehtje, G. R., and Hancock, H. G. 1997. Sulfentrazone adsorption and mobility as affected by soil and pH. Weed Sci. 45:733–738.Google Scholar
Grichar, W. J., Beslar, B. A., and Brewer, K. D. 2003. Purple nutsedge control and potato (Solanum tuberosum) tolerance to sulfentrazone and halosulfuron. Weed Technol. 17:485–490.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, P. J. S., Boydston, R. A., and Ransom, C. V. 2005a. Weed Management in Potatoes with Spartan Herbicide. PNW Bulletin 577. University of Idaho Educational Communications, Moscow, ID. 6 p.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, P. J. S., Boydston, R. A., Ransom, C. V., Tonks, D. J., and Beutler, B. R. 2005b. Potato (Solanum tuberosum) variety tolerance to flumioxazin and sulfentrazone. Weed Technol. 19:704–717.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, P. J. S. and Eberlein, C. V. 2003. Weed management. in Stark, J. C. and Love, S. L., eds. Potato Production Systems. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho Agricultural Communications. Pp. 240–283.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, P. J. S., Fletcher, F. E., and Beutler, B. R. 2003. Weed control with preemergence flumioxazin and sulfentrazone herbicides in potatoes. Western Soc. Weed Sci. 2003 Research Progress Report. Pp. 48–51.Google Scholar
Krausz, R. F., Kapusta, G., and Matthews, J. L. 1998. Sulfentrazone for weed control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 12:684–689.Google Scholar
Krausz, R. F. and Young, B. G. 2003. Sulfentrazone enhances weed control of glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 17:249–255.Google Scholar
Miller, T. W. and Libbey, C. R. 2002. Sulfentrazone tolerance in selected potato cultivars. Western Soc. Weed Sci. Res. Progress Report. P. 40.Google Scholar
Niekamp, J. W., Johnson, W. G., and Smeda, R. J. 1999. Broadleaf control with sulfentrazone and flumioxazin in no-tillage soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 13:233–238.Google Scholar
Ogg, A. G. Jr. and Rogers, B. S. 1989. Taxonomy, distribution, biology, and control of black nightshade (Solanum nigrum) and related species in the United States and Canada. Rev. Weed Sci. 4:25–58.Google Scholar
Swantek, J. M., Sneller, C. H., and Oliver, L. R. 1998. Evaluation of soybean injury from sulfentrazone and inheritance of tolerance. Weed Sci. 46:271–277.Google Scholar
Taylor-Lovell, S., Wax, L. M., and Nelson, R. 2001. Phytotoxic response and yield of soybean (Glycine max) varieties treated with sulfentrazone or flumioxazin. Weed Technol. 15:95–102.Google Scholar
Tonks, D. J., Hutchinson, P. J. S., Ransom, C. V., Boydston, R. A., and Ross, C. G. 2001. Pacific Northwest potato tolerance and varietal response to sulfentrazone. Proc. Western Soc. Weed Sci. 54:43.Google Scholar
Viator, B. J., Griffen, J. L., and Ellis, J. M. 2002. Red morningglory (Ipomoea coccinea) control with sulfentrazone and azafeniden applied layby in sugarcane (Saccharum spp). Weed Technol. 16:142–148.Google Scholar
Vidrine, P. R., Griffen, J. L., Jordan, D. L., and Reynolds, D. B. 1996. Broadleaf weed control in soybean (Glycine max) with sulfentrazone. Weed Technol. 10:762–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wehtje, G. R., Walker, R. H., Grey, T. L., and Hancock, H. G. 1997. Response of purple (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow nutsedges (C. esculentus) to selective placement of sulfentrazone. Weed Sci. 45:382–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. E., Nissen, S. J., and Thompson, A. 2002. Potato (Solanum tuberosum) variety and weed response to sulfentrazone and flumioxazin. Weed Technol. 16:567–574.Google Scholar