Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:22:31.499Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficacy of Propoxycarbazone-sodium for Cheat (Bromus secalinus) Control in Winter Wheat and Carryover on Double-Cropped Grain Sorghum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Thomas F. Peeper ,
Amanda E. Stone  and
Jason P. Kelley
Thomas F. Peeper
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078
Amanda E. Stone*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078
Jason P. Kelley
Affiliation:
Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Southern Great Plains wheat growers typically apply either sulfosulfuron or propoxycarbazone-sodium for selective control of cheat. Although astute growers apply herbicides early in the growing season, herbicide application is often delayed until mid-winter or later. The effects of application timing of propoxycarbazone-sodium on cheat efficacy and on injury to the following grain sorghum crop have not been documented. Application of each herbicide at 17 intervals throughout the growing season indicated that cheat control with propoxycarbazone-sodium was greater than or equal to 90% even when application was delayed for several months after seeding. In contrast, cheat control with sulfosulfuron was variable when application was delayed more than 6 wk after wheat was seeded. Delaying sulfosulfuron application decreased wheat yield. Grain sorghum was not affected by propoxycarbazone-sodium residues regardless of application timing to wheat. Conversely, grain sorghum was severely injured by sulfosulfuron residues regardless of herbicide application timing.

Keywords

Propoxycarbazone-sodiumsulfosulfuroncheat, Bromus secalinus L. BROSEgrain sorghum, Sorghum bicolor L.wheat, Triticum aestivium L.Carryoverherbicide injury
Type
Weed Management—Major Crops
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , June 2009 , pp. 202 - 205
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous 2005. Maverick® product label. St. Louis, MO: Monsanto Company. 5.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2006. Olympus™ product label. Research Triangle Park, NC: Bayer CropScience LP. 11.Google Scholar
[EPA] Environmental Protection Agency 2004. EPA Pesticide Fact Sheet. Propoxycarbazone-sodium conditional registration June 30, 2004. Washington, DC: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 8.Google Scholar
Geier, P. W., Stahlman, P. W., and Hargett, J. G. 2001. Dose response of weeds and winter wheat to MKH 6561. Weed Sci 49:788–791.Google Scholar
Johnson, G., Basta, N., Hattey, J., Raun, B., and Zhang, H. 1998. OSU Soil Test Interpretations. OSU Ext. Facts No. 2225. Stillwater, OK: Cooperative Extension Service, Oklahoma State University. 8.Google Scholar
Kelley, J. P. and Peeper, T. F. 2003a. MON 37500 application timing affects cheat (Bromus secalinus) control and winter wheat. Weed Sci 51:231–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, J. P. and Peeper, T. F. 2003b. Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and rotational crop response to MON 37500. Weed Technol 17:55–59.Google Scholar
Krenzer, G. and Peeper, T. 1998. Use of maverick in wheat under section 18 specific exemption. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State University, PT98-30. 2.Google Scholar
Lyon, D. J., Miller, S. D., and Siefert-Huggins, S. 2003. Mon 37500 soil residues affect rotational crops in the high plains. Weed Technol 17:792–798.Google Scholar
Peterson, D. E. and Regehr, D. L. 2005. Rotational crop response to flucarbzaone, flucarbazone plus chlorsulfuron, sulfulfuron, propoxycarbazone, and propoxycarbazone plus mesosulfuron. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc 60:7.Google Scholar
SAS 1988. SAS/STAT® User's Guide, Release 6.03 Edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. 1028.Google Scholar
Stone, J. C., Peeper, T. F., and Stone, A. E. 2006. Rotational cropping systems to reduce cheat (Bromus secalinus) densities. Weed Technol 20:445–452.Google Scholar
Weimer, M. R., Oemichen, B., Gast, R., and Peterson, M. 2007. Rotational crop response following application of pyroxsulam in wheat. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Sci. Soc 62:96.Google Scholar