Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T17:30:38.224Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effectiveness of Herbicides for Control of Hairy Vetch (Vicia villosa) in Winter Wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

William S. Curran
Affiliation:
Plant Science Department, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
John M. Wallace*
Affiliation:
Plant Science Department, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Steven Mirsky
Affiliation:
Sustainable Agricultural Systems Laboratory, USDA-Agricultural Research Service, BARC-W, Beltsville, MD 20705
Benjamin Crockett
Affiliation:
Plant Science Department, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in 2009–2010 at Pennsylvania and Maryland locations, and repeated it in 2010–2011 to test the effectiveness of POST-applied herbicides at fall and spring timings on seeded hairy vetch in winter wheat. A total of 16 herbicide treatment combinations was tested that included synthetic auxins, acetolactate synthase (ALS) inhibitors, and a protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitor. Spring applications tended to be more effective than fall applications. Among synthetic auxins, clopyralid (105 g ae ha−1) and treatments containing dicamba (140 g ae ha−1) were effective at both timings, resulting in greater than 90% hairy vetch control at wheat harvest. Pyroxsulam and prosulfuron applied at 18 g ai ha−1 provided the most effective hairy vetch control (> 90%) at both application timings among ALS inhibitors. Spring applications of several herbicides provided moderate (> 80%) to high (> 90%) levels of hairy vetch control, including: 2,4-D amine (140 g ae ha−1), mesosulfuron-methyl (15 g ai ha−1), tribenuron-methyl (13 g ai ha−1), and thifensulfuron/tribenuron-methyl treatments (16 and 32 g ai ha−1). Winter wheat injury was evaluated, but symptoms were negligible for most treatments. Winter wheat yields declined with increasing hairy vetch biomass. Fall herbicides may be prioritized to reduce hairy vetch competition during the fall and early spring growing season. Our research has established that several synthetic auxin and ALS-inhibiting herbicides, applied POST in fall or spring, can be safely used in winter wheat to control hairy vetch in an integrated weed management program.

En localidades de Pennsylvania y Maryland, se realizó un experimento de campo en 2009–2010, y se repitió en 2010–2011, para evaluar la eficacia de herbicidas aplicados POST en el otoño y la primavera sobre Vicia villosa sembrado en trigo de invierno. Se evaluó un total de 16 tratamientos de combinaciones de herbicidas, los cuales incluyeron auxinas sintéticas, inhibidores de acetolactate synthase (ALS), e inhibidores de protoporphyrinogen oxidase. Las aplicaciones de primavera tendieron a ser más efectivas que de otoño. Entre las auxinas sintéticas, clopyralid (105 g ae ha−1) y los tratamientos que contenían dicamba (140 g ae ha−1) fueron efectivos en ambos momentos de aplicación, y resultaron en más de 90% de control de V. villosa al momento de la cosecha del trigo. Pyroxsulam y prosulfuron, aplicados a 18 g ai ha−1, brindaron el control más efectivo de V. villosa (> 90%) en ambos momentos de aplicación, entre los inhibidores de ALS. Las aplicaciones en la primavera de varios herbicidas brindaron niveles de control de V. villosa de moderados (> 80%) a altos (> 90%), y los tratamientos incluyeron: 2,4-D amine (140 g ae ha−1), mesosulfuron-methyl (15 g ai ha−1), tribenuron-methyl (13 g ai ha−1), y thifensulfuron/tribenuron-methyl (16 a 32 g ai ha−1). El daño en el trigo de invierno fue evaluado, pero los síntomas fueron mínimos para la mayoría de los tratamientos. Los rendimientos del trigo de invierno disminuyeron con el aumento de la biomasa de V. villosa. Los herbicidas aplicados en el otoño podrían ser priorizados para reducir la competencia de V. villosa en el otoño y temprano en la primavera durante la temporada de producción. Nuestra investigación ha establecido que varios herbicidas auxinas sintéticas e inhibidores de ALS, aplicados POST en el otoño o la primavera, pueden ser usados en forma segura en trigo de invierno para controlar V. villosa en un programa de manejo integrado de malezas.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Aarssen, LW, Hall, IV, Jensen, K (1986) The biology of Canadian weeds. 76. Vicia angustifolia L., V. cracca L., V. sativa L., V. tetrasperma (L.) Schreb and V. villosa Roth. Can J Plant Sci 66:711737 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baskin, CC, Baskin, JM (2006) The natural history of soil seed banks of arable land. Weed Sci 54:549557 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackshaw, RE, Hamman, WH (1998) Control of downy brome (Bromus tectorum) in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) with MON 37500. Weed Technol 12:421425 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blevins, RL, Herbek, JH, Frye, WW (1990) Legume cover crops as a nitrogen source for no-till corn and grain sorghum. Agron J 82:769772 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A, ed (2007) Managing Cover Crops Profitably. 3rd edn. Sustainable Agriculture Network Handbook Series 9. Beltsville, MD: Sustainable Agriculture Network Google Scholar
Curran, WS, Hoffman, LD, Werner, EL (1994) The influence of a hairy vetch (Vicia villosa) cover crop on weed control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 8:777784 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, WS, Lingenfelter, DD, Tooker, JF (2012). Small grains pest management. Pages 313331 in Penn State Agronomy Guide. University Park, PA: College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University Google Scholar
Davis, AS (2010) Cover-crop roller-crimper contributes to weed management in no-till soybean. Weed Sci 58:300309 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derksen, DA, Kirkland, KJ, McLennan, BR, Hunter, JH, Loeppky, HA, Bowren, KE (1989) Influence of fall and spring herbicide application on winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ‘Norstar'). Can J Plant Sci 69:881888 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, RS, Cardina, J, Loux, M (2003) Integration of cover crops with postemergence herbicides in no-till corn and soybean. Weed Sci 51:9951001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geier, P, Stahlman, PW, Peterson, DE, Miller, SD (2002) Application timing effects BAY MKH 6561 and MON 37500 efficacy and crop response in wheat. Weed Technol 16:800806 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geier, PW, Stahlman, PW, Peterson, DE, Claassen, MM (2011) Pyroxsulam compared with competitive standards for efficacy in winter wheat. Weed Technol 25:316321 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, KL, Gallagher, RS, Burnham, M, Bradley, BB, Larson, ZM, Walker, CW, Watson, CJ (2010) Mitigation of seed germination impediments in hairy vetch. Agron J 102:13461351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNaughton, KE, Brown, LR, Sikkema, PH (2014) Tolerance of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and underseeded red clover (Trifolium pretense L.) to fall-applied post-emergent broadleaf herbicides. Am J Plant Sci 5:12651271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mischler, RD, Duiker, SW, Curran, WS, Wilson, D (2010) Hairy vetch management for no-till organic corn production. Agron J 102:355362 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosjidis, JA, Owsley, CM, Lirkland, MS, Rogers, KM (1995) Registration ‘AU Early Cover' hairy vetch. Crop Sci 35:1509 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, MA, Cowbrough, MJ, Sikkema, PH, Tardif, FJ (2013) Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) tolerance to mixtures of herbicides and fungicides applied at different timings. Can J Plant Sci 93:491501 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seefeldt, SS, Conn, JS, Jackson, BE, Sparrow, SD (2007) Response of seedling bird vetch (Vicia cracca) to six herbicides. Weed Technol 21:692694 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snapp, SS, Swinton, SM, Labarta, R, Mutch, D, Black, JR, Leep, R, Nyiraneza, J, O'Neil, K (2005) Evaluating cover crops for benefits, costs and performance within cropping system niches. Agron J 97:322332 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soltani, N, Brown, LR, Cowan, T, Sikkema, PH (2014) Weed management in spring seeded barley, oats and wheat with prosulfuron. Int J Agron. DOI: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soltani, N, Shropshire, C, Sikkema, PH (2006) Responses of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to autumn applied post-emergence herbicides. Crop Prot 25:346349 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stougaard, RN, Mallory-Smith, CA, Mickelson, JA (2004) Downy brome (Bromus tectorum) response to imazamox rate and application timing in herbicide-resistant winter wheat. Weed Technol 23:202205 Google Scholar
Teasdale, JR, Devine, TE, Mosjidis, JA, Bellinder, RR, Beste, CE (2004) Growth and development of hairy vetch cultivars in the northeastern United States as influenced by planting and harvesting date. Agron J 96:12661271 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teasdale, JR, Pillai, P, Collins, RT (2005) Synergism between cover crop residue and herbicide activity on emergence and early growth of weeds. Weed Sci 53:521527 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teasdale, JR, Rosecrance, RC (2003) Mechanical versus herbicidal strategies for killing a hairy vetch cover crop and controlling weeds in minimum-tillage corn production. Am J Alt Agric 18:95102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tonitto, C, David, MB, Drinkwater, LE (2006) Replacing bare fallows with cover crops in fertilizer-intensive cropping systems: a meta-analysis of crop yield and N dynamics. Agric Ecosyst Environ 112:5872 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tottman, DR (1978) The effects of a dicamba herbicide mixture on the grain yield components of winter wheat. Weed Res 18:335339 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, JM, Mirsky, S, Curran, WS, Crockett, (2014) Hairy vetch (Vicia villosa) seedbank dynamics and implications for cover crop management. Proc Northeast Weed Sci Soc 69 Google Scholar
Yeo, IY, Lee, S, Sadeghi, AM, Beeson, PC, Hively, WD, McCarty, GW, Lang, MW (2013) Assessing winter cover crop nutrient uptake efficiency using a water quality simulation model. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 10:1422914263 Google Scholar