Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:59:04.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Nicosulfuron Mixtures and Time of Application on Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Cultivars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Terry A. Littlefield ,
Daniel L. Colvin ,
Barry J. Brecke  and
Lambert B. McCarty
Terry A. Littlefield
Affiliation:
Agron. Dept., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
Daniel L. Colvin
Affiliation:
Agron. Dept., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
Barry J. Brecke
Affiliation:
Agron. Dept., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
Lambert B. McCarty
Affiliation:
Env. Hort. Dept., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted near Marianna, Trenton, and Archer, FL in 1990 and 1991 to investigate the effect of nicosulfuron mixtures and time of application on five peanut cultivars. Nicosulfuron at 54 g ai/ha was applied alone or in mixture with 2,4-DB at 280 g ai/ha 5 weeks after planting (WAP), 9 WAP, or 5 plus 9 WAP. Injury was greater from early and sequential nicosulfuron applications while a single application 9 WAP typically did not cause significant injury or reduce peanut yield. The 5 WAP and 5 plus 9 WAP applications often caused early visible injury and sometimes reduced peanut yield. When peanut yields were compared, ‘Florigiant’ was the most sensitive cultivar while ‘Southern Runner’ and ‘Valencia’ were more tolerant to nicosulfuron. ‘Sunrunner’ and ‘NC-7’ were intermediate in tolerance to nicosulfuron. In several instances, the addition of 2,4-DB to nicosulfuron reduced initial crop injury and ameliorated yield losses resulting from nicosulfuron applied alone.

Keywords

Nicosulfuron, 2-[[[[(4,6-dimethoxy-2-pyrimidinyl)amino]carbonyl]amino]sulfonyl]-N,N-dimethyl-3-pyridinecarboxamide2,4-DB, 4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)butanoic acidpeanut, Arachis hypogaea L.
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , March 1997 , pp. 1 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1993. Farmerstock peanuts inspection instructions. U.S. Dep. Agric., Washington, D.C. 93 p.Google Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1994. Product manual. E.I. duPont Nemours and Company. Wilmington, DE. p. 29–36 and 113–122.Google Scholar
3. Bhowmik, P. C., O'Toole, B. M., and Andaloro, J. 1992. Effects of nicosulfuron on quackgrass (Elytrigia repens) control in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 6:52–56.Google Scholar
4. Carver, W. A., 1961. Florigiant: A jumbo runner peanut. Cir. S-129, Agric. Exp. Stn. Univ. of Florida. 6 p.Google Scholar
5. Colvin, D. L., and Brecke, B. J. 1992. Weed control in peanuts. Weeds in the Sunshine Fact Sheet. Univ. of Florida. Gainesville, FL.Google Scholar
6. Dobbels, A. F., and Kapusta, G. 1993. Postemergence weed control in corn (Zea mays) with nicosulfuron combinations. Weed Technol. 7:844–850.Google Scholar
7. Dowler, C. C., 1992. Weed survey—southern states. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 45:397–399.Google Scholar
8. Eberlein, C. V., and Miller, T. L. 1989. Corn (Zea mays) tolerance and weed control with thiameturon. Weed Technol. 3:255–260.Google Scholar
9. Gorbet, D. W., Norden, A. J., Shokes, F. M., and Knauft, D. A. 1986. Southern Runner: A new leafspot-resistant peanut variety. Cir. S-324, Agric. Exp. Stn. Univ. of Florida, Gainesville. 13 p.Google Scholar
10. Green, J. M., and Ulrich, J. F. 1993. Response of corn (Zea mays L.) inbreds and hybrids to sulfonylurea herbicides. Weed Sci. 41:508–516.Google Scholar
12. Hsi, D.C.H., 1980. New Mexico Valencia C Peanut. Bull. 672, New Mexico Agric. Exp. Stn. 15 p.Google Scholar
13. Johnson, W. C. III, Holbrook, C. C., Mulilinix, B. G. Jr., and Cardina, J. 1992. Response of eight genetically diverse peanut genotypes to chlorimuron. Peanut Sci. 19:111–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Mekki, M., and Leroux, G. D. 1994. Activity of nicosulfuron, primisulfuron and their mixture on field corn (Zea mays), soybean (Glycine max) and seven weed species. Weed Technol. 8:436–440.Google Scholar
15. Monks, D. W., Mullins, C. A., and Johnson, K. E. 1992. Response of sweet corn (Zea mays) to nicosulfuron and primisulfuron. Weed Technol. 6:280–283.Google Scholar
16. Morton, C. A., and Harvey, R. G. 1992. Sweet corn (Zea mays) hybrid tolerance to nicosulfuron. Weed Technol. 6:91–96.Google Scholar
17. Mueller, T. C., Hays, R. M., and Krueger, W. A. 1993. Nicosulfuron and primisulfuron activity in two Tennessee soils. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 46:351.Google Scholar
18. Norden, A. J., Gorbet, D. W., and Knauft, D. A. 1983. Sunrunner: A runner market-type peanut. Cir. S-303. Agric. Exp. Stn. Univ. of Florida, Gainesville. 8 p.Google Scholar
19. Rosales-Robles, E. R., 1993. Postemergence shattercane (Sorghum bicolor) control in corn (Zea mays) in northern Tamaulipas, Mexico. Weed Technol. 7:830–834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Simpson, D. M., Diehl, K. E., and Stoller, E. W. 1994. 2,4-D safening of nicosulfuron and terbufos interaction in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 8:547–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Wilcut, J. W., Wehtje, G. R., Patterson, M. G., Cole, T. A., and Hicks, T. V. 1989. Absorption, translocation and metabolism of foliar-applied chlorimuron in soybeans (Glycine max), peanuts (Arachis hypogaea), and selected weeds. Weed Sci. 37:175–180.Google Scholar
22. Wynne, J. C., and Mozingo, R. W. 1978. NC-7: An early maturing peanut variety. North Carolina Agric. Exp. Stn. 14 p.Google Scholar