Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:04:08.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Duration of Green Foxtail (Setaria viridis) Competition on Potato (Solanum tuberosum) Yield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David A. Wall
Affiliation:
Agric. Can. Res. Stn., P.O. Box 3001, Morden, Mb., Canada R0G 1J0
George H. Friesen
Affiliation:
Agric. Can. Res. Stn., P.O. Box 3001, Morden, Mb., Canada R0G 1J0

Abstract

The effects of different periods of green foxtail competition on the components of potato yield were investigated. Delaying the removal of green foxtail for 2 wk following crop emergence reduced total and marketable tuber yield by 19 and 29%, respectively, when averaged over 2 yr. Similarly, the number and average weight of marketable tubers were reduced by 24 and 6%, respectively. The proportion of unmarketable tubers comprising the total yield increased as the duration of weed competition was increased. Successively longer periods of green foxtail competition further decreased the measured parameters.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Blackshaw, R. E., Stobbe, E. H., and Sturko, R. W. 1981. Effect of seeding dates and densities of green foxtail (Setaria viridis) on the growth and productivity of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 29:212217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Brimhall, P. B., Chamberlain, E. W., and Alley, H. P. 1965. Competition of annual weeds and sugar beet. Weeds 13:3335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Chitsaz, M., and Nelson, D. C. 1983. Comparisons of various weed control programs for potatoes. Am. Potato J. 60:271280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Douglas, B. J., Thomas, A. G., Morrison, I. N., and Maw, M. G. 1985. The biology of Canadian weeds. 70. Setaria viridis (L.) Beauv. Can. J. Plant Sci. 65:669690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Friesen, G. H., and Shebeski, L. H. 1960. Economic losses caused by weed competition in Manitoba grain fields. I. Weed species, their relative abundance and their effect on crop yields. Can. J. Plant Sci. 40:457467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Ivany, J. A. 1986. Quackgrass competition effect on potato yield. Can. J. Plant Sci. 66:185187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Nelson, D. C., and Thoreson, M. C. 1981. Competition between potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) and weeds. Weed Sci. 29:672677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. O'Donovan, J. T., de St. Remy, E. A., O'Sullivan, P. A., Dew, D. A., and Sharma, A. K. 1985. Influence of the relative time of emergence of wild oat (Avena fatua) on yield loss of barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 33:498503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Saghir, A. R., and Markoullis, G. 1974. Effects of weed competition and herbicides on yield and quality of potatoes. Proc. 12th Br. Weed Control Conf. 2:533539.Google Scholar
10. Sahota, T. S., and Govindakrishnan, P. M. 1982. Critical period of crop weed competition in potato. Bangladesh Hortic. 10:1518.Google Scholar
11. Sonmez, S., and Karaca, I. 1975. Competition between annual weeds and potatoes and weed control. Turk. Phytopathol. 4:3546.Google Scholar
12. Thakral, K. K., Pandita, M. L., Khurana, S. C., and Kalloo, G. 1989. Effect of time of weed removal on growth and yield of potato. Weed Res. 29:1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Thomas, A. B., and Wise, R. F. 1984. Manitoba weed surveys: Cereal and oilseed crops from 1978, 1979 and 1981. Agric. Can. Weed Survey Ser., Publ. 84–1.Google Scholar
14. Thomas, A. B., and Wise, R. F. 1987. Weed survey of Saskatchewan cereal and oilseed crops, 1986. Agric. Can. Weed Survey Ser., Publ. 87–1.Google Scholar