Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T12:22:54.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of bicyclopyrone herbicide on sweetpotato and Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2020

Jennifer J. Lindley ,
Katherine M. Jennings ,
David W. Monks ,
Sushila Chaudhari Open the ORCID record for Sushila Chaudhari [Opens in a new window] ,
Jonathan R. Schultheis ,
Matthew Waldschmidt  and
Cavell Brownie
Jennifer J. Lindley
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Katherine M. Jennings
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
David W. Monks
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Sushila Chaudhari*
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Research Scholar, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC; current: Assistant Professor, Department of Horticulture, Plant and Soil Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
Jonathan R. Schultheis
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Matthew Waldschmidt
Affiliation:
Research Technician, Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Cavell Brownie
Affiliation:
Professor Emeritus, Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
*
Author for Correspondence: Sushila Chaudhari, Assistant Professor, Department of Horticulture, Plant and Soil Science Building, Office A440-B, 1066 Bogue Street, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI4882. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Management options are needed to limit sweetpotato yield loss due to weeds. Greenhouse studies were conducted in 2018 in Greensboro, NC, and in the field from 2016 to 2018 in Clinton, NC, to evaluate the effect of bicyclopyrone on sweetpotato and Palmer amaranth (field only). In greenhouse studies, Covington and NC04-531 clones were treated with bicyclopyrone (0, 25, 50, 100, or 150 g ai ha−1) either preplant (PP; i.e., immediately before transplanting) or post-transplant (PT; i.e., on the same day after transplanting). Sweetpotato plant injury and stunting increased, and vine length and shoot dry weight decreased with increasing rate of bicyclopyrone regardless of clone or application timing. In field studies, Beauregard (2016) or Covington (2017 and 2018) sweetpotato clones were treated with bicyclopyrone at 50 g ha−1 PP, flumioxazin at 107 g ai ha−1 PP, bicyclopyrone at 50 or 100 g ha−1 PP followed by (fb) S-metolachlor at 800 g ai ha−1 PT, flumioxazin at 107 g ha−1 PP fb S-metolachlor at 800 g ha−1 PT, flumioxazin at 107 g ha−1 PP fb S-metolachlor at 800 g ha−1 PT fb bicyclopyrone at 50 g ha−1 PT-directed, and clomazone at 420 g ai ha−1 PP fb S-metolachlor at 800 g ha−1 PT. Bicyclopyrone PP at 100 g ha−1 fb S-metolachlor PT caused 33% or greater crop stunting and 44% or greater marketable yield reduction compared with the weed-free check in 2016 (Beauregard) and 2017 (Covington). Bicyclopyrone PP at 50 g ha−1 alone or fb S-metolachlor PT resulted in 12% or less injury and similar no. 1 and jumbo yields as the weed-free check in 2 of 3 yr. Injury to Covington from bicyclopyrone PT-directed was 4% or less at 4 or 5 wk after transplanting and marketable yield was similar to that of the weed-free check in 2017 and 2018.

Keywords

Greenhouseweed controlcrop injuryinterferenceBicyclopyronePalmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Watsonsweetpotato, Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , August 2020 , pp. 552 - 559
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: Peter J. Dittmar, University of Florida

References

Accinelli, C, Mencarelli, M, Balogh, A, Ulmer, BJ, Screpanti, C (2015) Evaluation of field application of fungi-inoculated bioplastic granules for reducing herbicide carry over risk. Crop Prot 67:243–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (2018) Acuron® herbicide product label. Greensboro, NC: Syngenta Crop Production. 23 pGoogle Scholar
Anonymous (2010) Sandea® herbicide supplemental labeling. Yuma, AZ: Gowan Company. https://www3.epa.gov/pesticides/chem_search/ppls/081880-00018-20101101.pdf. Accessed: December 05, 2019Google Scholar
[APVMA] Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority (2017) Public Release Summary on the Evaluation of the New Active Bicyclopyrone in the Product Talinor Herbicide. https://apvma.gov.au/sites/default/files/publication/26736-prs-bicyclopyrone-talinor-herbicide.pdf. Accessed: November 22, 2017Google Scholar
Barkley, SL, Chaudhari, S, Jennings, KM, Schultheis, JR, Meyers, SL, Monks, DW (2016) Fomesafen programs for palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control in sweetpotato. Weed Technol 30:506–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beam, SC, Chaudhari, S, Jennings, KM, Monks, DW, Meyers, SL, Schultheis, JR, Waldschmidt, M, Main, JL (2018b) Response of Palmer amaranth and sweetpotato to flumioxazin/pyroxasulfone. Weed Technol 33:128–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beam, SC, Jennings, KM, Chaudhari, S, Monks, DW, Schultheis, JR, Waldschmidt, M (2018a) Response of sweetpotato cultivars to linuron rate and application time. Weed Technol 32:665–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhari, S, Jennings, KM, Meyers, SL (2018) Response of sweetpotato to oryzalin application rate and timing. Weed Technol 32:722–725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y, Hu, C, Doohan, D (2018) Safety of bicyclopyrone on several vegetable crops and efficacy of weed control. Weed Technol 32:498–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, LB, Chaudhari, S, Jennings, KM, Schultheis, JR, Meyers, SL, Monks, DW (2016) Evaluation of herbicide timings for Palmer amaranth control in a stale seedbed sweetpotato production system. Weed Technol 30:725–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunne, CL (2012) Environmental effects on an HPPD inhibiting herbicide’s persistence in different soils over a four-year period. https://soils.ifas.ufl.edu/media/soilsifasufledu/sws-main-site/pdf/technical-papers/Dunne_Cheryl_One_Year_Embargo.pdf. Accessed: November 22, 2017Google Scholar
Felix, J, Ishida, J (2013) Evaluation of preemergence and postemergence herbicides for weed control in direct-seeded onion. Pages 102–106. https://agsci.oregonstate.edu/sites/agscid7/files/malheur/attachments/ar/2013-000-CompleteReport.pdf. Accessed: November 22, 2017Google Scholar
Felix, J, Ishida, J (2015) Evaluation of Reflex® and Bicyclopyrone for Weed Control in Direct-seeded Onion. Pages 69–76. https://agsci.oregonstate.edu/sites/agscid7/files/malheur/attachments/ar/2015-000-CompleteReport.pdf http://www.cropinfo.net/pdf/ar/2015/2015-009-EvaluationOfReflex.pdf. Accessed: November 22, 2017Google Scholar
Fennimore, SA, Doohan, DJ (2008) The challenges of specialty crop weed control, future directions. Weed Technol 22:364–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gage, KL (2016) Bicyclopyrone: tolerance and efficacy in horseradish, Southern Illinois University. http://www.siu-weeds.com/research/2016/504.pdf. Accessed: November 22, 2017Google Scholar
Hand, LH, Nichols, C, Kuet, SF, Oliver, RG, Harbourt, CM, El‐Naggar, EM (2015) Quantifying soil surface photolysis under conditions simulating water movement in the field: a new laboratory test design. Environ Toxicol Chem 34:2236–2243CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrison, HF, Jackson, DM (2011) Response of two sweet potato cultivars to weed interference. Crop Prot 30:1291–1296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartzler, B (2015) Acuron—4 Actives, 3 Herbicide Groups. Iowa State University Extension and Outreach. http://extension.agron.iastate.edu/weeds/mgmt/2015/acuron.pdf. Accessed: February 20, 2019Google Scholar
Heap, I (2019) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org/summary/MOA.aspx. Accessed: January 8, 2019Google Scholar
Kemble, JM, ed. (2019) 2019 Southeastern U.S. Vegetable Handbook. https://s3.amazonaws.com/files.growingproduce.com/files/pdf/SOUTHEASTERNU.S.2019VEGETABLECROPHANDBOOK.pdf. Accessed: March 9, 2019Google Scholar
Knezevic, SZ, Evans, SP, Blankenship, EE, Van Acker, RC, Lindquist, JL (2002) Critical period for weed control: the concept and data analysis. Weed Sci 50:773–786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Bonte, DR, Harrison, HF, Motsenbocker, CE (1999) Sweetpotato clone tolerance to weed interference. HortSci 34:229–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, SL, Jennings, KM, Schultheis, JR, Monks, DW (2010a) Evaluation of flumioxazin and S-metolachlor rate and timing for palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) control in sweetpotato. Weed Technol 24:495–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, SL, Jennings, KM, Schultheis, JR, Monks, DW (2010b) Interference of palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in sweetpotato. Weed Sci 58:199–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monks, DW, Jennings, KM, Meyers, SL, Smith, TP, Korres, NE (2019) Sweetpotato: important weeds and sustainable weed management. Pages 554–579in Korres, NE, Burgos, NR, Duke, SO, eds. Weed Control: Sustainability, Hazards, and Risks in Cropping Systems Worldwide. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. 664 pGoogle Scholar
Peachey, E (2015) Preliminary screen for potential herbicides in direct-seeded vegetable and seed crops. http://ir4.rutgers.edu/Fooduse/PerfData/4032.pdf. Accessed: May 12, 2019Google Scholar
Schultheis, JR, Sorensen, KA, Monks, DW, Holmes, GJ, Thornton, AC, , Toth Jr, SJ (eds.) (2005) Crop profile for sweetpotatoes in North Carolina. https://ipmdata.ipmcenters.org/documents/cropprofiles/NCsweetpotato1999.pdf. Accessed: December 5, 2018Google Scholar
Smith, SC, Jennings, KM, Monks, DW, Schultheis, JR, Reberg-Horton, SC (2019) Tolerance of sweetpotato to herbicides applied in plant propagation beds. Weed Technol 33:147–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, TP, Stoddard, S, Shankle, M, Schultheis, J (2009) Sweetpotato production in the United States. Pages 287–323in Loebenstein, G, Thottappilly, G, eds. The Sweetpotato. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. 522 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture (2005) United States Standards for Grades of Sweet Potatoes. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture. 4 pGoogle Scholar
[USDA-NASS] U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service (2017) 2017 North Carolina State Agriculture Review. https://www.nass.usda.gov/Quick_Stats/Ag_Overview/stateOverview.php?state=NORTH%20CAROLINA. Accessed: December 11, 2018Google Scholar
[US EPA] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1999) Reregistration Eligibility Decision: EPTC. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/20000SBW.PDF?Dockey=20000SBW.PDF Accessed: December 5, 2019Google Scholar
Yencho, GC, Pecota, KV, Schultheis, JR, Zvezdana-Pesic, V, Holmes, GJ, Little, BE, Thornton, AC, Truong, VD (2008) Covington sweetpotato. HortSci 43:1911–1914CrossRefGoogle Scholar