Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:59:30.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Application Factors on Efficacy of Fluazifop-P-Butyl in Flax

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

George H. Friesen
Affiliation:
Morden, MB, Canada, R0G 1J0
David A. Wall
Affiliation:
Morden, MB, Canada, R0G 1J0

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to determine the efficacy of fluazifop-P-butyl for the control of green foxtail, wild oat, barley, and wheat in flax as influenced by spray nozzle orientation, time of day, and growth stage. Under drought conditions in 1988, control of wild oat, wheat, and barley with fluazifop-P-butyl was enhanced 75%, 53% and 78%, respectively, when nozzles were oriented to spray forward 45°. Under adequate soil moisture conditions enhancement of control was minimal. Green foxtail control improved when fluazifop-P-butyl was applied from 1700 to 2100 h, but time of day had no effect on control of wild oat, barley, or wheat. Fluazifop-P-butyl effectiveness was reduced when applied 4 d after flax emergence due to late emerging grass seedlings. Green foxtail was the most tolerant to fluazifop-P-butyl, whereas wild oat, wheat, and barley were the most susceptible.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Chandrasena, N. R., and Sagar, G. R. 1987. The effect of site of application of 14C-fluazifop on its uptake and translocation by quackgrass (Agropyron repens). Weed Sci 35:457562.Google Scholar
2. Colby, S. R., Bone, J. R., and Akhavein, A. A. 1982. PP009, a selective herbicide for control of perennial and annual grasses. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., p. 1415.Google Scholar
3. Coupland, D. 1988. Pre-treatment environmental effects on the uptake, translocation, metabolism and performance of fluazifop-P-butyl in Elymus repens . Weed Res. 29:289297.Google Scholar
4. Dorrell, D. G. 1973. Effects of unusual field weathering on the quality of flax seed. Can. J. Plant Sci. 53:907910.Google Scholar
5. Ennis, B. G., and Ashley, R. A. 1983. Effect of morning, mid-day and evening application on control of large crabgrass by several postemergence herbicides. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 37:155160.Google Scholar
6. Friesen, G. H. 1986. Effect of weed interference on yield and quality of flax seed oil. Can. J. Plant Sci. 66:10371040.Google Scholar
7. Friesen, G. H., and Wall, D. A. 1990. Improving the efficiency of sethoxydim in flax. Weed Technol. 4:749753.Google Scholar
8. Hamill, A. S., Marriage, P. B., and Friesen, G. H. 1977. A method for assessing herbicide performance in small plot experiments. Weed Sci. 25:386389.Google Scholar
9. Kells, J. J., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1984. Absorption, translocation, and activity of fluazifop-butyl as influenced by plant growth stage and environment. Weed Sci. 32:143149.Google Scholar
10. Plowman, R. E., Stonebridge, W. C., and Hawtree, J. N. 1989. Fluazifop-butyl–a new selective herbicide for the control of annual and perennial grass weeds. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf.–Weeds 17:2937.Google Scholar
11. Smeda, R. J., and Putnam, A. R. 1990. Influence of temperature, rainfall, grass species, and growth stage on efficacy of fluazifop. Weed Technol. 4:349355.Google Scholar
12. Swern, D. 1964. Bailey's Industrial Oil and Fat Products. 3rd ed., Interscience Publ., New York, p. 128131.Google Scholar