Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T22:53:52.295Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Adjuvants on Weed Control and Soybean (Glycine max) Tolerance with AC 263,222

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Marshall B. Wixson
Affiliation:
Dept. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
David R. Shaw
Affiliation:
Dept. Plant Pathol. Weed Sci., Miss. State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762

Abstract

Field experiments were established to observe the effects of adjuvants and time of application on weed control and ‘Terra-Vig 515’ soybean tolerance with POST applications of AC 263,222. A nonionic surfactant or a crop oil concentrate increased sicklepod control with AC 263,222 applied at either V2 or V6 soybean growth stages. Sicklepod control increased as AC 263,222 was increased from 35 to 70 g ai ha–1 only when applied without an adjuvant. Late in the season, there was no difference in sicklepod control between V2 and V6 applications. Adjuvants and application timing within herbicide treatments had no effect on pitted morningglory control, and, though adjuvants increased common cocklebur control, all treatments controlled more than 85% of both species. AC 263,222 with adjuvants at all rates and timings injured and stunted soybean more 2 wk after treatment compared to AC 263,222 alone. AC 263,222 at 35 or 70 g ha–1 with crop oil concentrate reduced yields more than AC 263,222, with either a surfactant or no adjuvant when applied to V2 soybeans.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bredehoeft, M., and Nalewaja, J. D. 1987. Adjuvants with postemergence herbicides for wild mustard control. Proc. North Cent. Weed Cont. Conf. 42:38.Google Scholar
2. Edmund, R. E. Jr., and York, A. C. 1987. Factors affecting postemergence control of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) with imazaquin and DPX-F6025: spray volume, growth stage, and soil applied alachlor and vernolate. Weed Sci. 35:216218.Google Scholar
3. Fehr, W. R., Caviness, C. E., Burmood, D. T., and Pennington, J. D. 1971. Stage of development descriptions for soybeans, Glycine max (L.) Merr. Crop Sci. 11:2526.Google Scholar
4. Harrison, S. K., and Wax, L. M. 1986. Adjuvant effects on absorption, translocation, and metabolism of haloxyfop-methyl in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 34:185195.Google Scholar
5. Hogue, C. W. 1974. Response of cotton and weeds to herbicides with phytobland oil or surfactant. Weed Sci. 22:97101.Google Scholar
6. Kollman, G. E., and Yih, R. Y. 1978. Effects of spray adjuvants on the postemergence activity of acifluorfen. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 18:13.Google Scholar
7. Lee, S. D., and Oliver, L. R. 1982. Efficacy of acifluorfen on broadleaf weeds, times and methods of application. Weed Sci. 30:520526.Google Scholar
8. McWhorter, C. G., and Azlin, W. R. 1978. Effects of environment on the toxicity of glyphosate to johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 26:605608.Google Scholar
9. Nalewaja, J. D., and Woznica, Z. 1985. Environment and chlorsulfuron phytotoxicity. Weed Sci. 33:395399.Google Scholar
10. Nalewaja, J. D., and Adamczewski, K. A. 1977. Uptake and translocation of bentazon with adjuvants. Weed Sci. 25:309315.Google Scholar
11. Nalewaja, J. D., and Adamczewski, K. A. 1977. Redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) control with bentazon plus adjuvants. Weed Sci. 25:506514.Google Scholar
12. Shaw, D. R., Cole, A. W., Coats, G. E., Smith, C. A., Holloway, J., Rainero, H. P., Wixson, M. B., Bruff, S. A., and Ratnayake, W.R.A.S. 1989. Weed control investigations in non-delta soybeans, wheat, and pastures–1988. Miss. Agric. For. Exp. Stn. Info. Bull. 143. 122 p.Google Scholar
13. Sims, B. D., DeFelice, M. S., Guethle, D. R., and Brown, W. B. 1989. Influence of liquid fertilizers on postemergence herbicide activity in soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:83.Google Scholar
14. Smith, R. J. Jr. 1974. Propanil and adjuvants for barnyardgrass control in rice. Weed Sci. 22:419426.Google Scholar
15. Varshney, J. G., and Singh, H. G. 1990. Effect of adjuvants on herbicide efficacy in controlling weeds in wheat. Weed Sci. 38:229236.Google Scholar
16. Weis, M. E. 1987. Imazethapyr applied postemergence in soybeans with non-ionic surfactants and fertilizer solutions. Proc. North Cent. Weed Cont. Conf. 42:44.Google Scholar
17. Willard, T. S., Griffin, J. L., Reynolds, D. B., Vidrine, P. R., and Habetz, R. J. 1990. Evaluation of AC 263,222 in soybeans in Louisiana. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 43:29.Google Scholar
18. Wixson, M. B., and Shaw, D. R. 1989. Weed control and soybean tolerance with AC 263,222. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 42:60.Google Scholar
19. Wixson, M. B., and Shaw, D. R. 1990. Development of AC 263,222 as a postemergence soybean herbicide. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Sc. 43:46.Google Scholar