Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T22:21:51.485Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Additives and Small Grain Herbicides on the Efficacy of AE F130060 03 plus AE F107892 in Barley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Steven R. King  and
Edward S. Hagood Jr.
Steven R. King*
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0331
Edward S. Hagood Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology, Physiology, and Weed Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24061-0331
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Experiments were conducted in the 2000 to 2001 and 2001 to 2002 growing seasons to evaluate the efficacy of AE F130060 03 plus AE F107892 with nonionic surfactant (NIS) or methylated seed oil (MSO) plus urea ammonium nitrate (UAN) applied in November (early postemergence, EP), January (middle postemergence, MP), and March (late postemergence, LP) for control of Italian ryegrass in barley. AE F130060 03 plus AE F107892 was also combined with MSO and UAN and various postemergence (POST) small grain herbicides at the three application timings. All AE F130060 03 plus AE F107892 treatment combinations controlled Italian ryegrass at least 84% at the three application timings. Treatment combinations of AE F130060 03 plus AE F107892 applied LP generally resulted in lower yields because of increased duration of Italian ryegrass competition, increased barley injury, and insufficient time for barley to recover from the injury. Transient phytotoxicity to barley occurred after EP and MP applications of all AE F130060 03 plus AE F107892 treatment combinations. LP applications of MSO and UAN or other POST small grain herbicides combined with MSO and UAN increased barley injury compared with injury from AE F130060 03 plus AE F107892 applied with NIS. Results indicate that AE F130060 03 plus AE F107892 treatments are an effective method for control of Italian ryegrass in barley; however, treatments should be applied either EP or MP to reduce early Italian ryegrass competition and allow sufficient time for barley recovery from injury before harvest.

Keywords

AE F107892, [diethyl 1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-5-methyl-2-pyrazoline-3, 5-dicarboxylate]AE F115008 00, [methyl 4-iodo-2-[3-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-ureidosulfonyl]benzoate, sodium salt]AE F130060 00, [methyl-2-[3-(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin-2-yl)ureidosulfonyl]-4-methane-sulfonamidomethylbenzoate]AE F130060 03 is a mixture of AE F130060 00 and AE F 115008 00Italian ryegrass, Lolium multiflorum (Lam.) # LOLMUbarley, Hordeum vulgare (L.) # HORVX, ‘Nomini’Bromoxynilchlorsulfuroncrop tolerancedicambadiclofopdiclofop resistancemetsulfuronthifensulfurontribenuronTriticum aestivum, TRZAWEP, early postemergenceLP, late postemergenceMP, middle postemergenceMSO, methylated seed oilNIS, nonionic surfactantPOST, postemergenceUAN, urea ammonium nitrateWAT, weeks after treatment
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 372 - 379
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. 2002a. Iodosulfuron-methyl-sodium Technical Bulletin. Lyon, France: Aventis CropScience S. A. Pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 2002b. Mesomaxx Technical Bulletin. Lyon, France: Aventis CropScience S. A. Pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Bailey, W. A., Hatzios, K. K., and Wilson, H. P. 2003a. Responses of winter wheat and diclofop-methyl-sensitive and -resistant Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) to AE F130060 03. Weed Sci. 51:515–522.Google Scholar
Bailey, W. A., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 2002. Mesosulfuron/iodosulfuron (AE F130060) for Italian ryegrass control in VA wheat. Proc South. Weed Sci. Soc. 55:21–22.Google Scholar
Bailey, W. A., Wilson, H. P., and Hines, T. E. 2003b. Influence of AE F130060 03 application timing on Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) control. Weed Technol. 17:842–853.Google Scholar
Barnes, M. A., Peeper, T. F., Epplin, F. M., and Krenzer, E. G. Jr. 2001. Effects of herbicides on Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum), forage production, and economic returns from dual-purpose winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 15:264–270.Google Scholar
Brann, D. E., Holshouser, D. L., and Mullins, G. L. 2000. Agronomy Handbook. Blacksburg, Va: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Cooperative Extension Publ. 424-100. Pp. 3–29.Google Scholar
Brewster, B. D., Kloft, D. L., Appleby, A. D., Aldrich-Markham, S., and Gingrich, G. 1991. Control of diclofop-resistant Italian ryegrass in winter wheat. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 304 p.Google Scholar
Cole, C. M., Mallory-Smith, C. A., Affeldt, R. P., and Colquhoun, J. B. 2004. Reduced wild oat (Avena fatua) control in winter wheat with mesosulfuron-methyl (AE F130060) and broadleaf herbicides. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 44:2.Google Scholar
Cralle, H. T., Fojtasek, T. B., Carson, K. H., Chandler, J. M., Miller, T. D., Senseman, S. A., Bovey, R. W., and Stone, M. J. 2003. Wheat and Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) competition as affected by phosphorous nutrition. Weed Sci. 51:425–429.Google Scholar
Crooks, H. L. and York, A. C. 2002. Italian ryegrass control in wheat with mesosulfuron-methyl. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 55:22–23.Google Scholar
Crooks, H. L., York, A. C., and Jordan, D. L. 2003. Wheat (Triticum aestivum) tolerance and Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) control by AE F130060 00 plus AE F115008 mixed with other herbicides. Weed Technol. 17:881–889.Google Scholar
Heap, I. 2003. International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds: Web page: http://www.weedscience.org. Accessed: July 29, 2003.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. P. and Peeper, T. F. 2002. Performance of new herbicides for winter annual grass control in winter wheat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 55:22.Google Scholar
King, S. R. and Hagood, E. S. 2002. Italian ryegrass control in small grains in Virginia. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 56:101.Google Scholar
King, S. R. and Hagood, E. S. Jr. 2003. Effect of application rate and timing of AE F130060 03 plus AE F107892 for control of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in barley (Hordeum vulgare). Weed Technol. 17:866–870.Google Scholar
King, S. R., Hagood, E. S. Jr., Bradley, K. W., and Hatzios, K. K. 2003. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of AE F130060 03 in wheat, barley, and Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) with or without dicamba. Weed Sci. 51:509–514.Google Scholar
Miller, P. A., Westra, P., and Nissen, S. J. 1999. The influence of surfactant and UAN on foliar absorption of MON 37500. Weed Sci. 47:270–274.Google Scholar
Morozov, I. V., Hagood, E. S., and Hipkins, P. L. 1999. Response of Virginia collections of diclofop-resistant Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) to preemergence and postemergence herbicides. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 52:40.Google Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D., Palczynski, J., and Manthey, F. A. 1990. Imazethapyr efficacy with adjuvants and environments. Weed Technol. 4:765–770.Google Scholar
Stahlman, P. W., Currie, R. S., and El-Hamid, M. A. 1997. UAN carrier and surfactant increase foliar herbicide injury in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Technol. 11:7–12.Google Scholar
Stanger, C. E. and Appleby, A. P. 1989. Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) accessions tolerant to diclofop. Weed Sci. 37:350–352.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. 2000. Weed survey- southern states grass crops subsection. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 53:247–274.Google Scholar