Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T00:18:48.376Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Economic Comparison of Herbicides for Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) Control in Glyphosate-Tolerant Soybean (Glycine max)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Tammy L. Mckinley
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37901-1071
Roland K. Roberts
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37901-1071
Robert M. Hayes
Affiliation:
Plant and Soil Science, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37901-1071
Burton C. English
Affiliation:
Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37901-1071

Abstract

Returns to land, management, and risk were compared where glyphosate and four graminicides (quizalofop-P, fluazifop-P, sethoxydim, and clethodim) were used for johnsongrass control in glyphosate-tolerant soybean. In 1994 and 1995, returns to land, management, and risk for glyphosate-tolerant soybean were highest using glyphosate and lowest using sethoxydim. Break-even analysis showed that yields needed for equivalent returns with any nontransgenic soybean cultivar treated with any of the graminicides could range from 67 kg/ha less to 202 kg/ha more than the yields achieved with glyphosate. Based on this methodology, farmers would increase their return to land, management, and risk by planting glyphosate-tolerant soybean if expected yield from a standard cultivar treated with a standard herbicide program were less than the break-even yield.

Type
Research
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Banks, P. A. and Bundschuh, S. A. 1989. Johnsongrass control in conventionally tilled and no-tilled soybeans with foliar-applied herbicides. Agron. J. 81:757760.Google Scholar
Black, C. C., Chen, T. M., and Brown, R. H. 1969. Biochemical basis for plant competition. Weed Sci. 17:338344.Google Scholar
Delannay, X., Bauman, T. T., Beighley, D. H., et at. 1995. Yield evaluation of a glyphosate-tolerant soybean line after treatment with glyphosate. Crop Sci. 35:14611467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doll, J. P. and Orazem, F. 1992. Production Economics: Theory with Applications. 2nd ed. Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing Company. 470 p.Google Scholar
Elmore, C. D. 1986. Weed survey—southern states. Res. Rep. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:136158.Google Scholar
Gerloff, D. and Maxey, L. 1997. Field Crop Budgets for 1997: A Supplement to the Guide to Farm Planning. University of Tennessee Agricultural Economics and Research Development Information Ser. 36. 28 p.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. L., Reynolds, D. B., Jordan, D. L., Prochaska, L. M., and Rogers, R. L. 1994. Evaluation of Roundup Ready transgenic soybean in Louisiana. Louisiana Agric. 37:23.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. G. and Frans, R. E. 1991. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in soybeans (Glycine max) with postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 5:8791.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. G., Frans, R. E., and Parsch, L. D. 1991. Economics of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 5:765770.Google Scholar
Jordan, D. L., Griffin, J. L., Vidrine, P. R., Shaw, D. R., and Reynolds, D. B. 1997. Comparison of graminicides applied at equivalent costs in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 11:804809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. and Anderson, J. M. 1981. The technical and economical effects of johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 29:245–52.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. and Azlin, W. R. 1978. Effects of environment on the toxicity of glyphosate to johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) and soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 26:605608.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. and Hartwig, E. E. 1972. Competition of johnsongrass and cocklebur with six soybean varieties. Weed Sci. 20:5659.Google Scholar
Mullins, J. A., Overton, J. R., and Jeffrey, L. S. 1974. Response of soybeans and johnsongrass to glyphosate applications. Tennessee Farm and Home Sci. Prog. Rep. 90:1013.Google Scholar
Rhodes, G. N. Jr., and Breeden, G. 1997. 1997 Weed Control Manual for Tennessee Field Crops. University of Tennessee Agriculture Extension Service Publ. PB1580. 105 p.Google Scholar
Roberts, R. K. and Hayes, R. M. 1989. Decision criterion for profitable johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) management in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 3:4447.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1985. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. 5th ed. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 956 p.Google Scholar
Vidrine, P. R. 1989. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in soybeans (Glycine max) with postemergence herbicides. Weed Technol. 3:455458.Google Scholar
Williams, C. S. and Hayes, R. M. 1984. Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) competition in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 32:498501.Google Scholar
Winton-Daniels, K. W., Frans, R., and McClelland, M. 1990. Herbicide systems for johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense) control in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 4:115122.Google Scholar