Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T14:26:35.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differential Tolerance of Winter Wheat (Triticum aestivum) to Cyanazine and Triazinone Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Thomas K. Baker  and
Thomas F. Peeper
Thomas K. Baker
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Thomas F. Peeper
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Okla. State Univ., Stillwater, OK 74078
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to evaluate the tolerance of 79 winter wheat cultivars to cyanazine, BAY SMY 1500, and metribuzin. When known, the pedigree of the more cyanazineand BAY SMY 1500-tolerant hard red winter cultivars included ‘Hope’ and/or ‘Cheyenne’ parentage. However, the cultivars more sensitive to BAY SMY 1500, notably those with ‘Vona’ parentage, were not consistently sensitive to cyanazine. Visible injury on the hard red and soft red winter cultivars did not consistently indicate yield reductions. The soft red winter cultivars, compared to the hard red winter cultivars, were generally more sensitive to cyanazine than BAY SMY 1500.

Keywords

BAY SMY 15003, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(ethylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-onecyanazine, 2-[[4-chloro-6-(ethylamino)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl]amino]-2-methyl-propane-nitrilemetribuzin, 4-ammo-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-onecheat, Bromus secalinus L. ♯4 BROSEwinter wheat, Triticum aestivum L.BAY SMY 1500metribuzincheathard red winter wheatsoft red winter wheat
Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 4 , Issue 3 , September 1990 , pp. 569 - 575
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anderson, R. L., and Riggle, B. D. 1988. Bioactivity of metribuzin in a controlled-release formulation on ‘Vona’ winter wheat and downy brome. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Soc. Weed Sci, p. 332.Google Scholar
2. Atkins, I. M. 1982. Registration of Maverick wheat. Crop Sci. 22:690.Google Scholar
3. Atkins, I. M. 1982. Registration of Texred wheat. Crop Sci. 22:689.Google Scholar
4. Atkins, I. M., Porter, K. B., and Merkle, O. G. 1967. Registration of Sturdy wheat. Crop Sci. 7:406.Google Scholar
5. Bacon, R. K., Collins, F. C., and Lavy, T. L. 1986. Evaluation of wheat cultivars for seedling tolerance to atrazine. Held Crop Res. 14:135–139.Google Scholar
6. Bacon, R. K., and Frans, R. E. 1989. Genetic differences among wheat cultivars for tolerance to two herbicides. Ark. Farm Res. 38(5):9.Google Scholar
7. Baker, T. K., and Peeper, T. F. 1987. Performance of cyanazine applied early postemergence for Bromus control in winter wheat. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:80.Google Scholar
8. Cagle, J. E., Fortino, J., and Phillips, M. W. 1986. Tolerance of winter wheat to BAY SMY 1500 and metribuzin. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 39:100.Google Scholar
9. Carver, B. F., Inskeep, W. P., Wilson, N. P., and Westerman, R. L. 1988. Seedling tolerance to aluminum toxicity in hard red winter wheat germplasm. Crop Sci. 28:463–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Colgan, J. W., Sorensen, V. M., and Scoggean, A. C. 1987. Tycor (SMY 1500) herbicide: Wheat research update. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 40:107–108.Google Scholar
11. Cox, T. S., Lookhart, G. L., Walker, D. E., Harrell, L. G., Albers, L. D., and Rogers, D. M. 1985. Genetic relationships among hard red winter wheat cultivars as evaluated by pedigree analysis and gliadin polyacrylamide gel electrophoretic patterns. Crop Sci. 25:1058–1063.Google Scholar
12. Cox, T. S., Murphy, J. P., and Rodgers, D. M. 1985. Coefficients of parentage for 400 winter wheat cultivars. Kansas St. Univ. Agric. Exp. Stn., Agron. Dep. Rpt. Google Scholar
13. Fedtke, C., and Schmidt, R.R. 1988. Selective action of the new herbicide 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(ethylthio)-1,2,4- in different wheat, Triticum aestivum, cultivars. Weed Sci. 36:541–544.Google Scholar
14. Fischer, M L. 1983. Investigations on the differential tolerance of wheat cultivars to metribuzin. PhD. thesis, Okla. State Univ., Stillwater.Google Scholar
15. Fortino, J., Cagle, J. E., and Phillips, M. W. 1986. Performance of BAY SMY 1500 herbicide for Bromus control in winter wheat. Proc. South, Weed Sci. Soc. 39:99.Google Scholar
16. Hayes, R. M., Chambers, A. Y., Graves, C. R., and Rhodes, G. N. Jr. 1986. Differential response of soft red winter wheat cultivars to metribuzin. Tenn. Farm Home Sci. 138:3–6.Google Scholar
17. Heyne, E. G., and Niblett, C. L. 1978. Registration of Newton wheat. Crop Sci. 18:696.Google Scholar
18. Krall, J. M., Stahlman, P. W., and Miller, S. D. 1989. Winter wheat cultivars response to SMY 1500 and metribuzin. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 42:85.Google Scholar
19. Murphy, J. P., Cox, T. S., and Rodgers, D. M. 1986. Cluster analysis of red winter wheat cultivars based upon coefficients of parentage. Crop Sci. 26:672–676.Google Scholar
20. Peek, D. C., and Appleby, A. P. 1987. Activity of ethyl-metribuzin and metribuzin as related to soil properties. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Soc. Weed Sci., p. 362.Google Scholar
21. Peek, D. C., and Appleby, A. P. 1987. Influence of soil pH on activity of ethyl-metribuzin and metribuzin. Res. Prof. Rep. West. Soc. Weed Sci., p. 367.Google Scholar
22. Ratliff, R. L., and Peeper, T. F. 1987. Bromus control in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) with the ethylthio analog of metribuzin. Weed Technol. 1:235–241.Google Scholar
23. Retzinger, E. J. Jr., and Richard, P. 1983. Weed control in wheat with metribuzin. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 36:132.Google Scholar
24. Runyan, T. J., McNeil, W. K., and Peeper, T. F. 1982. Differential tolerance of wheat cultivars to metribuzin. Weed Sci 30:94–97.Google Scholar
25. Rydrych, D. J. 1986. The effect of rate of seeding on metribuzin and atrazine tolerance in wheat. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Soc. Weed Sci., p. 234.Google Scholar
26. Schmidt, J. W., Johnson, V. A., Mattern, P. J., Dreier, A. F., McVey, D. V., and Hatchett, J. H. 1983. Registration of Brule wheat. Crop Sci. 23:1223.Google Scholar
27. Schmidt, J. W., Johnson, V. A., Mattern, P. J., Dreier, A. F., McVey, D. V., and Hatchett, J. H. 1989. Registration of Redland wheat. Crop Sci. 29:491.Google Scholar
28. Schmidt, J. W., Johnson, V. A., Nordquist, P. T., Mattern, P. J., Dreier, A. F., McVey, D.V., and Hatchett, J. H. 1989. Registration of Cody wheat. Crop Sci. 29:490–491.Google Scholar
29. Schroeder, J., Banks, P. A., and Nichols, R. L. 1985. Soft red winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivar response to metribuzin. Weed Sci 34:66–69.Google Scholar
30. Thacker, R. W. 1987. Effects of seeding method on Bromus spp. control with preplant applications of atrazine and cyanazine. MS. thesis. Okla. State Univ., Stillwater.Google Scholar
31. Valverde, B. E., Brewster, B. D., Appleby, A. P., and Spinney, R. L. 1987. Winter cereal tolerance to herbicides. Res. Prog. Rep. West. Soc. Weed Sci., p. 338.Google Scholar
32. Wicks, G. A., Nordquist, P. T., and Schmidt, J. W. 1987. Response of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) to herbicides. Weed Sci 35:259–262.Google Scholar