Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:30:54.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differential Response of Arkansas Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) to Glyphosate and Mesotrione

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2018

Shilpa Singh ,
Nilda Roma-Burgos ,
Vijay Singh ,
Ed Allan L. Alcober ,
Reiofeli Salas-Perez  and
Vinod Shivrain
Shilpa Singh
Affiliation:
Graduate student, Cell and Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA
Nilda Roma-Burgos*
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA
Vijay Singh
Affiliation:
Former: Graduate student, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR USA; current: Assistant Research Scientist, Soil and Crop Sciences Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
Ed Allan L. Alcober
Affiliation:
Former: Graduate student, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA; current: Assistant Professor, Department of Agronomy and Food Science, Visayas State University, Baybay City, Leyte 6521-A Philippines
Reiofeli Salas-Perez
Affiliation:
Graduate student, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA
Vinod Shivrain
Affiliation:
Regional Herbicide Lead, Product Biology Lead APAC, Syngenta, Singapore
*
Author for correspondence: N. Roma-Burgos, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701 (E-mail: [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We conducted a greenhouse study to evaluate the differential response of Palmer amaranth to glyphosate and mesotrione and to quantify the level of tolerance to mesotrione in recalcitrant (difficult-to-control) accessions and their offspring. Seeds were collected from 174 crop fields (corn, cotton, and soybean) across Arkansas between 2008 and 2016. Palmer amaranth seedlings (7 to 10 cm tall) were treated with glyphosate at 840 g ae ha–1 or mesotrione at 105 g ha–1. Overall, 47% of the accessions (172) were resistant to glyphosate with 68% survivors. Almost 35% of accessions were highly resistant, with 90% survivors. The majority of survivors from glyphosate application incurred between 31% and 60% injury. Mesotrione killed 66% of the accessions (174); the remaining accessions had survivors with injury ranging from 61% to 90%. Accessions with the least response to mesotrione were selected to determine tolerance level. Dose–response assays were conducted with four recalcitrant populations and their F1 progeny. The average effective doses (ED50) for the parent accessions and F1 progeny of survivors were 21.5 g ha–1 and 27.5 g ha–1, respectively. The recalcitrant parent populations were three- to five-fold more tolerant to mesotrione than the known susceptible population, as were the F1 progeny.

Keywords

Ian Burke, Washington State UniversityglyphosatemesotrionePalmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.corn, Zea mays L.cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr.Glyphosate resistancerecalcitrant populationsresistance evolutiondifferential tolerancetolerant population
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 32 , Issue 5 , October 2018 , pp. 579 - 585
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beaudegnies, R, Edmunds, AJ, Fraser, TE, Hall, RG, Hawkes, TR, Mitchell, G, Schaetzer, J, Wendeborn, S, Wibley, J (2009) Herbicidal 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase inhibitors—a review of the triketone chemistry story from a Syngenta perspective. Bioorg Med Chem 17:4134–4152 Google Scholar
Bond, JA, Oliver, LR, Stephenson, DO IV (2006) Response of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) accessions to glyphosate, fomesafen, and pyrithiobac. Weed Technol 20:885–892 Google Scholar
Burgos, NR, Kuk, YI, Talbert, RE (2001) Amaranthus palmeri resistance and differential tolerance of Amaranthus palmeri and Amaranthus hybridus to ALS-inhibitor herbicides. Pest Manag Sci 57:449–457 Google Scholar
Culpepper, AS, Grey, TL, Vencill, WK, Kichler, JM, Webster, TM, Brown, SM, York, AC, Davis, JW, Hanna, WW (2006) Glyphosate resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) confirmed in Georgia. Weed Sci 54:620–626 Google Scholar
Duke, SO (2005) Taking stock of herbicide-resistant crops 10 years after introduction. Pest Manag Sci 61:211–218 Google Scholar
Hausman, NE, Singh, S, Tranel, PJ, Riechers, DE, Kaundun, SS, Polge, ND, Thomas, DA, Hager, AG (2011) Resistance to HPPD-inhibiting herbicides in a population of waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) from Illinois, United States. Pest Manag Sci 67:258–261 Google Scholar
Heap, IM (2017) The International Survey of Herbicide Resistant Weeds. http://www.weedscience.org/default.aspx Accessed: January 7, 2017Google Scholar
Jha, P, Norsworthy, JK, Malik, MS, Bangarwa, SK, Oliveira, MJ (2006) T. emporal emergence of Palmer amaranth from a natural seed bank. Page 177 in Proceedings of the 59th Southern Weed Science Society, January 23–25, 2006, San Antonio, TX. Westminster, CO: Southern Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar
Jhala, AJ, Sandell, LD, Rana, N, Kruger, GR, Knezevic, SZ (2014) Confirmation and control of triazine and 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase–inhibiting herbicide-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Nebraska. Weed Technol 28:28–38 Google Scholar
Keeley, PE, Carter, CH, Thullen, RJ (1987) Influence of planting date on growth of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri). Weed Sci 35:199–204 Google Scholar
Klingaman, TE, Oliver, LR (1994) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci 42:523–527 Google Scholar
Massinga, RA, Currie, RS, Horak, MJ, Boyer, J Jr (2001) Interference of Palmer amaranth in corn. Weed Sci 49:202–208 Google Scholar
Massinga, RA, Currie, RS (2002) Impact of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) on corn (Zea mays) grain yield and yield and quality of forage. Weed Technol 16:532–536 Google Scholar
McMullan, PM, Green, JM (2011) Identification of a tall waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) biotype resistant to HPPD-inhibiting herbicides, atrazine, and thifensulfuron in Iowa. Weed Technol 25:514–518 Google Scholar
Nakka, S, Godar, AS, Wani, PS, Thompson, CR, Peterson, DE, Roelofs, J, Jugulam, M (2017) Physiological and molecular characterization of hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD)-inhibitor resistance in Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats.). Front Plant Sci 8:555 Google Scholar
Nichols, RL, Bond, J, Culpepper, AS, Dodds, D, Nandula, V, Main, CL, Marshall, MW, Mueller, TC, Norsworthy, JK, Price, A, Patterson, M (2009) Glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) spreads in the Southern United States. Resistant Pest Management Newsletter 18:8–10 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Griffith, GM, Scott, RC, Smith, KL, Oliver, LR (2008a) Confirmation and control of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Arkansas. Weed Technol 22:108–113 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Scott, RC, Smith, KL, Oliver, LR (2008b) Response of northeastern Arkansas Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) accessions to glyphosate. Weed Technol 22:408–413 Google Scholar
Oliveira, MC, Jhala, AJ, Gaines, T, Irmak, S, Amundsen, K, Scott, JE, Knezevic, SZ (2017) Confirmation and control of HPPD-inhibiting herbicide-resistant waterhemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) in Nebraska. Weed Technol 31:67–79 Google Scholar
Rowland, MW, Murry, DS, Verhalen, LM (1999) Full-season Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) interference with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci 47:305–309 Google Scholar
Salas, RA, Burgos, NR, Tranel, PJ, Singh, S, Glasgow, L, Scott, RC, Nichols, RL (2016) Resistance to PPO-inhibiting herbicide in Palmer amaranth from Arkansas. Pest Manag Sci 72:864–869 Google Scholar
Siehl, DL, Tao, Y, Albert, H, Dong, Y, Heckert, M, Madrigal, A, Lincoln-Cabatu, B, Lu, J, Fenwick, T, Bermudez, E, Sandoval, M (2014) Broad 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase inhibitor herbicide tolerance in soybean with an optimized enzyme and expression cassette. Plant Physiol 166:1162–1176 Google Scholar
Smith, DT, Baker, RV, Steele, GL (2000) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) impacts on yield, harvesting, and ginning in dryland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol 14:122–126 Google Scholar
Sosnoskie, LM, Webster, TM, Kichler, JM, MacRae, AW, Grey, TL, Culpepper, AS (2012) Pollen-mediated dispersal of glyphosate-resistance in Palmer amaranth under field conditions. Weed Sci 60:366–373 Google Scholar
Starke, RJ, Oliver, LR (1998) Interaction of glyphosate with chlorimuron, fomesafen, imazethapyr, and sulfentrazone. Weed Sci 46:652–660 Google Scholar
Steckel, LE (2007) The dioecious Amaranthus spp.: here to stay. Weed Technol 21:567–570 Google Scholar
Steckel, LE, Main, CL, Ellis, AT, Mueller, TC (2008) Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Tennessee has low level glyphosate resistance. Weed Technol 22:119–123 Google Scholar
Thompson, CR, Peterson, D, Lally, NG (2012) Characterization of HPPD resistant Palmer amaranth. http://wssaabstracts.com/public/9/ abstract-413.html. Accessed March 30, 2017Google Scholar
[USDA] US Department of Agriculture (2016) Crop Production 2016 Summary. http://www.worldofcorn.com/#us-corn-production-by-state. Accessed: April 3, 2017Google Scholar
Webster, TM (2005) Weed survey-southern states: broadleaf crops subsection. Pages 291–304 in Proceedings of the 58th Southern Weed Science Society. January 24–26, 2005, Charlotte, NC. Westminster, CO: Southern Weed Science SocietyGoogle Scholar