Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-21T21:45:16.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Critical time for weed removal in glyphosate-resistant soybean as influenced by preemergence herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2019

Stevan Z. Knezevic ,
Pavle Pavlovic ,
O. Adewale Osipitan Open the ORCID record for O. Adewale Osipitan [Opens in a new window] ,
Ethann R. Barnes ,
Clint Beiermann ,
Maxwel C. Oliveira ,
Nevin Lawrence ,
Jon E. Scott  and
Amit Jhala
Stevan Z. Knezevic*
Affiliation:
Professor, Northeast Research and Extension Center, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
Pavle Pavlovic
Affiliation:
Visiting Student, Northeast Research and Extension Center, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
O. Adewale Osipitan
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Research Associate, Northeast Research and Extension Center, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
Ethann R. Barnes
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
Clint Beiermann
Affiliation:
Graduate Student, Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
Maxwel C. Oliveira
Affiliation:
Former Graduate Student, Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
Nevin Lawrence
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Panhandle Research and Extension Center, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
Jon E. Scott
Affiliation:
Research Technologist, Northeast Research and Extension Center, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
Amit Jhala
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Stevan Z. Knezevic, Northeast Research and Extension Center, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Widespread and repeated use of glyphosate resulted in an increase in glyphosate-resistant (GR) weeds. This led to an urgent need for diversification of weed control programs and use of PRE herbicides with alternative sites of action. Field experiments were conducted over a 4-yr period (2015 to 2018) across three locations in Nebraska to evaluate the effects of PRE-applied herbicides on critical time for weed removal (CTWR) in GR soybean. The studies were laid out in a split-plot arrangement with herbicide regime as the main plot and weed removal timing as the subplot. The herbicide regimes used were either no PRE or premix of either sulfentrazone plus imazethapyr (350 + 70 g ai ha−1) or saflufenacil plus imazethapyr plus pyroxasulfone (26 + 70 + 120 g ai ha−1). The weed removal timings were at V1, V3, V6, R2, and R5 soybean stages, with weed-free and weedy season-long checks. Weeds were removed by application of glyphosate (1,400 g ae ha−1) or by hoeing. The results across all years and locations suggested that the use of PRE herbicides delayed CTWR in soybean. In particular, the CTWR without PRE herbicides was determined to be around the V1 to V2 (14 to 21 d after emergence [DAE]) growth stage, depending on the location and weed pressure. The use of PRE-applied herbicides delayed CTWR from about the V4 (28 DAE) stage up to the R5 (66 DAE) stage. These results suggest that the use of PRE herbicides in GR soybean could delay the need for POST application of glyphosate by 2 to 5 wk, thereby reducing the need for multiple applications of glyphosate during the growing season. Additionally, the use of PRE herbicides could provide additional modes of action needed to manage GR weeds in GR soybean.

Keywords

Kevin Bradley, University of MissouriGlyphosateimazethapyrpyroxasulfonesaflufenacilsulfentrazonesoybeanGlycine max (L.) MerrWeed interferenceyield loss
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 33 , Issue 3 , June 2019 , pp. 393 - 399
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adigun, J, Osipitan, AO, Lagoke, ST, Adeyemi, RO, Afolami, SO (2014) Growth and yield performance of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) as influenced by row-spacing and period of weed interference in south-west Nigeria. J Agric Sci 6:188–198 Google Scholar
Beckie, HJ, Harker, KN (2017) Our top 10 herbicide-resistant weed management practices. Pest Manag Sci 73:1045–1052 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buhler, DD, Liebman, M, Obrycki, JJ (2000) Theoretical and practical challenges to an IPM approach to weed management. Weed Sci 48:274–280 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eaton, BJ, Russ, OG, Feltner, KC (1976). Competition of velvetleaf, prickly sida, and Venice mallow in soybeans. Weed Sci 24:224–228 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elezovic, I, Datta, A, Vrbnicanin, S, Glamoclija, D, Simic, M, Malidza, G, Knezevic, SZ (2012) Yield and yield components of imidazolinone-resistant sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) are influenced by pre-emergence herbicide and time of post-emergence weed removal. Field Crops Res 128:137–146 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, SP, Knezevic, SZ, Lindquist, JL, Shapiro, CA, Blankenship, EE (2003) Nitrogen application influences the critical period for weed control in corn. Weed Sci 51:408–417 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, EC, Rogers, RS (1958) Heat units as a method of measuring maturity in corn. Agron J 50:611–615 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gustafson, TC, Knezevic, SZ, Hunt, TE, Lindquist, JL (2006) Early-season insect defoliation influences the critical time for weed removal in soybean. Weed Sci 54:509–515 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, MR, Swanton, CJ, Anderson, GW (1992) The critical period of weed control in grain corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci 40:441–447 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heap, I, Duke, SO (2018) Overview of glyphosate-resistant weeds worldwide. Pest Manag Sci 74:1040–1049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeschke, MR, Stoltenberg, DE, Kegode, GO, Sprague, CL, Knezevic, SZ, Hock, SM, Johnson, GA (2011) Predicted soybean yield loss as affected by emergence time of mixed-species weed communities. Weed Sci 59:416–423 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knezevic, SZ (2007) Herbicide tolerant crops: 10 years later. Maydica 52:245–250 Google Scholar
Knezevic, SZ, Elezovic, I, Datta, A, Vrbnicanin, S, Glamoclija, D, Simic, M, Malidza, G (2013) Delay in the critical time for weed removal in imidazolinone-resistant sunflower (Helianthus annuus) caused by application of pre-emergence herbicide. Int J Pest Manag 59:229–235 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knezevic, SZ, Evans, SP, Blankenship, EE, Van Acker, RC, Lindquist, JL (2002) Critical period of weed control: the concept and data analysis. Weed Sci 50:773–786 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knezevic, SZ, Evans, SP, Mainz, M (2003) Row spacing influences the critical timing for weed removal in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol 17:666–673 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knezevic, SZ, Osipitan, OA, Scott, JE (2018) Sensitivity of grape and tomato to micro-rates of dicamba-based herbicides. J Hort 5:1 Google Scholar
Knezevic, SZ, Streibig, JC, Ritz, C (2007) Utilizing R software package for dose-response studies: the concept and data analysis. Weed Technol 21:840–848 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kropff, M, Joenje, W, Bastiaans, L, Habekotte, B, van Oene, H, Werner, R (1987) Competition between a sugar beet crop and populations of Chenopodium album L. and Stellaria media L. Neth J Agric Sci 35:525–528 Google Scholar
Odero, DC, Wright, AL (2013) Phosphorus application influences the critical period of weed control in lettuce. Weed Sci 61:410–414 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osipitan, OA, Adigun, JA, Kolawole, RO (2016) Row spacing determines critical period of weed control in crop: cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) as a case study. Azarian J Agric 3:90–96 Google Scholar
Owen, MD (2016) Diverse approaches to herbicide-resistant weed management. Weed Sci 64:570–584 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed: August 2, 2017Google Scholar
Soltani, N, Dille, JA, Burke, IC, Sikkema, PH (2017) Perspectives on potential soybean yield losses from weeds in North America. Weed Technol 31:1–7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teasdale, JR (1995) Influence of narrow row/high population corn (Zea mays) on weed control and light transmittance. Weed Technol 9:113–118 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trezzi, MM, Vidal, RA, Patel, F, Miotto, E Jr, Debastiani, F, Balbinot, AA Jr, Mosquen, R (2015). Impact of Conyza bonariensis density and establishment period on soyabean grain yield, yield components and economic threshold. Weed Res 55:34–41 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tursun, N, Datta, A, Budak, S, Kantarci, Z, Knezevic, SZ (2016) Row spacing impacts the critical period for weed control in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Phytoparasitica 44:139–149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Acker, RC, Swanton, CJ, Weise, SF (1993) The critical period of weed control in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Weed Sci 41:194–200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar